Advertisement


Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Biomarker Analysis of the IMmotion010 Study

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Currently, standard of care in the adjuvant setting is pembrolizumab for patients that have had surgery and that are considered at high risk of recurrence for RCC. What we don't know is how we can better select our patients. At this recent ASCO, I had the chance to present an exploratory analysis within the IMmotion 010 study. This trial tested atezolizumab in the adjuvant setting did not demonstrate the disease-free survival benefit. But here the question is, can we do a better job with defining circulating biomarker? And so the work conducted, which is translational exploratory analysis, was a two-step process, the first one being identifying circulating proteins that were associated with an increase at time of disease recurrence. And when screening over 3000 proteins, one stands out, KIM-1, which stands for kidney injury molecule one, which clearly had an increase at the time of disease recurrence. Then we took on to the next step, which was to assess the association of high baseline KIM-1, meaning after surgery with disease-free survival. And we confirmed that KIM-1 is a prognostic circulating biomarker that was actually already demonstrated in the past in other adjuvant studies, but it is the first time that not only we saw a prognostic value, but also a potentially predictive value. Indeed, in our data sets, not only patients with high KIM-1 had a worst disease-free survival, but atezolizumab was associated with an increased benefit with regard to disease-free survival over placebo in those patients with high baseline KIM-1. Furthermore, we showed that the kinetic of this circulating biomarker is important because any increase in this biomarker was associated with worse DFS. Ultimately, we further validate the fact that patients at time of disease recurrence had a significant increase in KIM-1 using a different assay than the screening one. So taken all together, what these data are showing us is that circulating KIM-1 is a potential biomarker for prognostic assessment in the adjuvant space, but also potentially for the predictive use of checkpoint inhibitor in the adjuvant setting. And that actually come as a confirmation of prior work recently presented within the CheckMate 914 study as well. Of course, it will require further prospective validation, but this biomarker could help us in the setting of the adjuvant space to define a go/no-go strategy and potentially as well for monitoring patients and detect earlier recurrence. It is the first potential minimal residual disease biomarker that is being discussed in RCC.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Mostafa Eyada, MD, on Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus Bevacizumab in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Mostafa Eyada, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses study results showing that bevacizumab in combination with oral cyclophosphamide had a response rate of 40% in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant high-grade ovarian cancer (Abstract 5517).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, on Advanced Breast Cancer: New Data on Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant From the postMONARCH Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).

Breast Cancer

Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, on Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis From DESTINY-Breast07

Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy and the Université Paris-Saclay, discusses a dose-expansion interim analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) monotherapy and T-DXd plus pertuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 1009).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement