Advertisement


Jean-Marc Classe, MD, PhD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Lymphadenectomy From the CARACO Trial

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Jean-Marc Classe, MD, PhD, of France’s Nantes Université, discusses phase III results showing that systematic lymphadenectomy should be omitted in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes, as well as those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval complete surgery (LBA5505).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The CARACO trial is a trial about surgery for advance ovarian cancer patients. Advanced ovarian cancer patients are treated with complete surgery, with not residual, and the treatment could be primary surgery. If it is feasible to perform a primary complete surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy, or if it's not possible, we can perform neoadjuvant chemotherapy, complete interval surgery. And then the other treatments. W. Hen you see some lymph nodes suspicious at the CT scan before surgery or during surgery, you must perform a lymphadenectomy. The question is not for this patient. The question is for patient with no suspicious lymph node at the CT scan before surgery or during surgery at the palpation of the peritoneum. And for this patient, you have already a study, a randomized study called the LION study. It was presented at the ESCO in 2017. The LION study was for primary surgery, advanced ovarian cancer patients with no suspicious lymph node treated by primary surgery. The LION trial demonstrates that it's not useful to perform an lymphadenectomy. So the remaining question is, what is the interest of lymphadenectomy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy? And currently almost two thirds of the patients are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. So it is an important question. So the CARACO trial, the design is inclusion criteria, epithelial ovarian cancer, primary treatments, no metastasis, but a FIGO stage three, no suspicious node at the CT scan before surgery. And a randomization complete surgery with lymphadenectomy compared with complete surgery with no lymphadenectomy. The results of this trial, if you consider just the morbidity, we observed statistically significant morbidity higher in the group of lymphadenectomy with more lymphedema, more re-intervention, more bleeding, transfusion, so more toxicity. The mortality rate was the same between the two arms, around 1 percent, no more. And if you consider the characteristics of the patients, you can observe a lot of complete surgery. 85 percent of complete surgery in both arms. In the lymphadenectomy arm we observed 28 median number of rejected lymph nodes, and 43 involvements, 43 involvements in the lymphadenectomy arm. And the significance is that these 43 lymph nodes involved remain in the patients in the new lymphadenectomy arm. And what is the result? To avoid a lymphadenectomy, the results of the CARACO trial is negative. What does it mean? It means that it's not useful to perform a lymphadenectomy in this patient with no suspicious lymph nodes before a treatment. So you are increasing the toxicity, but you're not increasing the survival. And it is true, for the primary endpoint, the disease-free survival, it is true for the secondary endpoint overall survival. And when you see subgroup analysis, you look at the results of the interval surgery, on the interval surgery, no difference. You look at the results of only high-grade serous carcinoma, no difference. So in conclusion, CARACO trial is a negative trial. So it means that for patients treated for an advanced ovarian cancer by primary surgery or neuro adjuvant chemotherapy, you don't have to perform a lymphadenectomy. We must talk about three limitations of the study. The first one is that we didn't include the right number of patients. We need 450 patients and we include a little less patients. But more important, we miss 22 events. We add only 320 events, and we missed 6 percent of the events required. But whatever happened to these 22 missing events, it is not possible that it could change the results. So we can say that the CARACO trial is a trial negative that demonstrates the not efficiency of the lymphadenectomy in the treatment of the patient with primary or with neuro adjuvant chemotherapy in case of no suspicious lymph nodes before surgery.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Dejan Juric, MD, on Breast Cancer: Updates From the INAVO120 Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Dejan Juric, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discuss phase III findings on first-line use of inavolisib or placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who relapsed within 12 months of completing adjuvant endocrine therapy (Abstract 1003).

Colorectal Cancer

Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, on Colon Cancer: New Data on ctDNA Guiding Adjuvant Therapy

Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses data on survival and updated 5-year results from the DYNAMIC trial, which supports a role for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, including serial sampling, in the management of patients with stage II colon cancer (Abstract 108).

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD and Paolo A. Ascierto, MD, on Advanced Melanoma: Results From the RELATIVITY-048 Trial

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University and the Stanford Cancer Institute, and Paolo A. Ascierto, MD, of Italy’s Istituto Nazionale Tumori and IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, discuss efficacy and safety findings of the triplet therapy nivolumab, relatlimab-rmbw, and ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma (Abstract 9504).

 

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Lung Cancer

Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement