Don S. Dizon, MD, on Ovarian and Other Extrarenal Clear Cell Carcinomas: Update on Nivolumab and Ipilimumab
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Don S. Dizon, MD, of Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, discusses final phase II results of the BrUOG 354 trial showing that, for patients with ovarian and other extrarenal clear cell cancers, nivolumab and ipilimumab warrant further evaluation against standard treatment, given the historically chemotherapy-resistant nature of the disease (LBA5500).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I will be presenting BrUOG 354 which is a two-arm randomized non-comparative clinical trial that enrolled people with extrarenal clear cell carcinoma. And tested two regimens, both of them immunotherapeutic. One used nivolumab alone, and the other used nivolumab plus ipilimumab. We enrolled 46 people to this trial, 44 of whom were treated. All of these patients had a diagnosis of clear cell cancers of the gynecological tract. And that's important because clear cell cancers when you compare them to the more common serous type cancers, are associated with a worse prognosis. They do not respond as well to our standard chemotherapies, are prone to relapse more frequently. And unfortunately in the context of recurrent disease, they do not respond as well to treatment. So the prognosis is actually quite poor. This prompted this clinical trial. And it was actually based on some very preliminary data where people were seeing clinical complete responses in folks with clear cell cancers.
To this point, before this trial was presented, there had been two trials of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. One suggesting that clear cell cancer was associated with a five-fold higher response rate compared to other histologies. Although that clinical trial which was done by NRG Oncology group, only enrolled 12 people with clear cell. For that, suggestion was made. And the other was a SWOG clinical trial that enrolled 18 people with ovarian cancer and showing that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was effective with some durability, again, based on a very small number of patients. So our trial which enrolled 46 people, is the largest trial in this very rare cancer population.
What we can report is that both single-agent nivolumab, and nivolumab and ipilimumab have activity in clear cell cancers, and both are associated with survival outcomes although the one with combination therapy is longer. The overall response rate with single-agent nivolumab is 13%, which includes two partial responses. Median progression free survival is two months, and median overall survival in this trial was less than six months. With the combination therapy, the overall response rate was 33% with five complete responders. Median progression free survival in that arm was 17 months, and median overall survival is 24 months. And importantly for those who responded to the combination, the response was durable. And we had several patients who remain on study past two years, including up to today.
The ASCO Post Staff
Suzanne Trudel, MD, of Canada’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one or more prior lines of treatment, belantamab mafodotin-blmf plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival and showed a favorable overall survival trend compared with pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone.
The ASCO Post Staff
Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, reports the results from the phase II SACI-IO trial in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who received sacituzumab govitecan-hziy with or without pembrolizumab (LBA1004).
The ASCO Post Staff
Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, discusses recent findings from the CARTITUDE-4 trial showing that, in patients with lenalidomide-refractory functional high-risk multiple myeloma after one prior line of treatment, ciltacabtagene autoleucel improved outcomes vs the standard of care (Abstract 7504).
The ASCO Post Staff
Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).
The ASCO Post Staff
Brian I. Rini, MD, of Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings of the KEYNOTE-426 study of pembrolizumab plus axitinib vs sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. He details the exploratory biomarker results, including RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and PD-L1 (Abstract 4505).