Advertisement


Don S. Dizon, MD, on Ovarian and Other Extrarenal Clear Cell Carcinomas: Update on Nivolumab and Ipilimumab

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Don S. Dizon, MD, of Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, discusses final phase II results of the BrUOG 354 trial showing that, for patients with ovarian and other extrarenal clear cell cancers, nivolumab and ipilimumab warrant further evaluation against standard treatment, given the historically chemotherapy-resistant nature of the disease (LBA5500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I will be presenting BrUOG 354 which is a two-arm randomized non-comparative clinical trial that enrolled people with extrarenal clear cell carcinoma. And tested two regimens, both of them immunotherapeutic. One used nivolumab alone, and the other used nivolumab plus ipilimumab. We enrolled 46 people to this trial, 44 of whom were treated. All of these patients had a diagnosis of clear cell cancers of the gynecological tract. And that's important because clear cell cancers when you compare them to the more common serous type cancers, are associated with a worse prognosis. They do not respond as well to our standard chemotherapies, are prone to relapse more frequently. And unfortunately in the context of recurrent disease, they do not respond as well to treatment. So the prognosis is actually quite poor. This prompted this clinical trial. And it was actually based on some very preliminary data where people were seeing clinical complete responses in folks with clear cell cancers. To this point, before this trial was presented, there had been two trials of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. One suggesting that clear cell cancer was associated with a five-fold higher response rate compared to other histologies. Although that clinical trial which was done by NRG Oncology group, only enrolled 12 people with clear cell. For that, suggestion was made. And the other was a SWOG clinical trial that enrolled 18 people with ovarian cancer and showing that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was effective with some durability, again, based on a very small number of patients. So our trial which enrolled 46 people, is the largest trial in this very rare cancer population. What we can report is that both single-agent nivolumab, and nivolumab and ipilimumab have activity in clear cell cancers, and both are associated with survival outcomes although the one with combination therapy is longer. The overall response rate with single-agent nivolumab is 13%, which includes two partial responses. Median progression free survival is two months, and median overall survival in this trial was less than six months. With the combination therapy, the overall response rate was 33% with five complete responders. Median progression free survival in that arm was 17 months, and median overall survival is 24 months. And importantly for those who responded to the combination, the response was durable. And we had several patients who remain on study past two years, including up to today.

Related Videos

Kidney Cancer

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Biomarker Analysis of the IMmotion010 Study

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).

Breast Cancer

Denise A. Yardley, MD, on Early Breast Cancer: Findings From the NATALEE Trial on Patients With Node-Negative Disease

Denise A. Yardley, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute, discusses the NATALEE trial, which assessed ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs an NSAI alone in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer at increased risk of recurrence, including patients with node-negative disease, and showed a benefit in invasive disease–free survival (Abstract 512).

Lymphoma

David J. Andorsky, MD, on DLBCL and FL: New Data on Use of Subcutaneous Epcoritamab

David J. Andorsky, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, discusses EPCORE NHL-6, an ongoing study of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). As outpatients, the study participants were given subcutaneous epcoritamab-bysp to see whether they could be safely monitored and cytokine-release syndrome appropriately managed in the outpatient setting (Abstract 7029).

Breast Cancer

Reshma Jagsi, MD, and Christian F. Singer, MD, MPH, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Adding a Vaccine to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

Reshma Jagsi, MD, DPhil, of Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, and Christian F. Singer, MD, MPH, of the Medical University of Vienna, discuss the MUC-1 vaccine tecemotide. When added to standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer, this vaccine improved distant relapse–free and overall survival rates. Despite the exploratory nature of this observation, says Dr. Singer, this is the first long-term survival benefit of an anticancer vaccine in breast disease reported to date (Abstract 587).

Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, on Lung Cancer: Telehealth vs In-Person Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement