Advertisement


Alex Andrea Francoeur, MD, on Endometrial Cancer and Obesity Trends

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Alex Andrea Francoeur, MD, of UC Irvine Health, discusses data showing an association between the increasing incidence of endometrial cancer and obesity, which disproportionately affects younger women and women of color. According to Dr. Francoeur, the findings warrant targeted health services and public health interventions to stabilize and ultimately reverse the rising rates (Abstract 5507).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Obesity has been identified to be a risk factor for endometrial cancer, but trends overtime have not been well studied. So the objective of our study was to study the trends of endometrial cancer and obesity from 2001 to 2018 in the United States using a large national database. Additionally, we aim to identify people most at risk based on these findings and identify disparities on a population-based level. For this study, we used the United States Cancer Statistics Database to gather data on endometrial cancer. This database represents over 99% of all cancer cases diagnosed in the United States. We then performed a correction for hysterectomy and pregnancy within this database. For data on obesity, we used the NHANES database, which provides population-based statistics on obesity for the United States. To compare the relationship in trends between endometrial adenocarcinoma and obesity, a Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for selected groups. We identified 586,000 cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma from 2001 to 2018. When looking at our obesity data, the majority of the US female population is either overweight or obese. And the majority of Black and Hispanic women are overweight or obese. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma rates are increasing in younger age groups. In the 20 to 29 year old age group, we found that there's been a 137% increase in the rate of endometrial adenocarcinoma since 2001. In the 30 to 39 year old age group, we found that there's been a 71% increase. When looking at trends by race and ethnicity, we found that in Black women, there's been an increase in endometrial cancers of 25% since 2001, and in Hispanic women, there's been an increase of 17%. We then performed a trend analysis of obesity and endometrial cancer in parallel. Rates of obesity are rising at 7.5% in the 20 to 29 year old age group per year. The highest rate of increase in any age group. Rates of endometrial cancer are rising in this age group at 4.5% per year, also the highest of any age group. The correlation coefficient for this age group was 0.78, demonstrating a strong correlation. We see a similar trend in women age 30 to 39 with rates of obesity rising at 4.5% annually, and rates of cancer rising at 3% per year. Again, demonstrating a strong correlation with an R of 0.88. We see similar trends when we look at race and ethnicity, where obesity and endometrioid adenocarcinoma are statistically significantly correlated. In conclusion, the current data, although retrospective, demonstrate a strong temporal association in the rising rates of obesity and endometrioid adenocarcinoma in the United States. This represents a public health emergency, and actions are needed to address the impact of obesity on endometrial cancer. These actions can include increased awareness, medications, targeting weight management, surgical management of obesity, and increased research in this area.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, on Advanced Breast Cancer: New Data on Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant From the postMONARCH Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, and Samuel R. Denmeade, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Results From the TRANSFORMER Trial

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Samuel R. Denmeade, MD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, discuss a study showing that patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate whose disease is progressing on abiraterone with androgen-receptor alterations detected in the blood may benefit from bipolar androgen therapy. Routine liquid biopsy testing may enable further adoption of bipolar treatment (Abstract 5003).

Gynecologic Cancers

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, on Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes With Hormonal Therapy in Reproductive-Age Patients

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, discusses data showing that reproductive-age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who use fertility-preserving hormonal therapy seemed to have good overall survival after a 10-year follow-up (Abstract 5508).

Leukemia
Immunotherapy

Allison M. Winter, MD, on Richter Transformation: New Data on a CAR T-Cell Treatment

Allison M. Winter, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses real-world outcomes with lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with Richter transformation, a difficult-to-treat population with a poor prognosis. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed this therapy provided clinical benefit with a high complete response rate (Abstract 7010).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement