Toni K. Choueiri, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Potential Predictive Biomarkers of Treatment Efficacy
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a biomarker analysis from the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The ongoing study aims to identify a predictive biomarker that may potentially guide therapeutic choices. (Abstract 608).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
What we presented was the biomarker analysis. So, we had data on RNA-Seq, on immunohistochemistry. We asked a lot of questions during this study. The first question we asked is if there are any gene signatures that were previously described in RCC with VEGF inhibitor, but PD-L1 inhibitor with nivolumab that's a PD-L1 inhibitor. So are they different? And actually we couldn't validate any of the signature that were described with PD-L1 inhibitors plus VEGF inhibitors such as the bevacizumab atezolizumab from emotion 151 or from JAVELIN Renal 101 with axitinib and avelumab. But of course this is a PD-L1 inhibitor, so we weren't able to validate that. But we actually found some hallmark gene sets and some individual genes associated with progression-free survival. And that started us to characterize the tumor microenvironment of the responders to PD-L1 plus VEGF inhibitor better.
We also looked at immunohistochemistry, specifically at CDAT cell, at PD-L1 and at c-MET looking at different cutoff and definitions. And also we couldn't find anything that is predictive for the combination versus single agent sunitinib. The only thing that came up, and this was not surprising, is that some prognostic markers, so for example, in sunitinib treated patient PD-L1 positivity is associated with worse outcome. We knew that. This is not new at all and nivolumab, cabozantinib resulted in better PFS regardless. Same thing with MET, the membrane CT, c-Met expression was not associated with much, but the cytoplasmic c-Met was associated with worse prognosis. So this was not predictive. Overall in term of next step and what that means that we continue to try to identify predictive biomarkers, probably the next step using a composite model for nivolumab, cabozantinib efficacy. But it seems all these biomarker we identify, they may be specific to a drug or a combination rather than class of agents such as VEGF and PD-1, PD-L1 inhibitor.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, of the Yale Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-921 study, which was designed to assess the combination of pembrolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. They had not received chemotherapy, but their disease progressed on the next-generation hormonal agent, or they could not tolerate the agent. (Abstract 19).
The ASCO Post Staff
Paul L. Nguyen, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses results from the FORMULA-509 study, which compared postoperative salvage radiotherapy and 6 months of GnRH agonist with or without abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AAP) and apalutamide, after radical prostatectomy. The study suggested that adding AAP and apalutamide to salvage radiotherapy, plus 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy, may improve outcomes, particularly in the subgroup of patients with a prostate-specific antigen level higher than 0.5 ng/mL. (Abstract 303).
The ASCO Post Staff
Aristotelis Bamias, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, discusses results from the phase III IMvigor130 study, which suggest that atezolizumab monotherapy continues to show better tolerability vs chemotherapy for patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. (Abstract LBA441).
The ASCO Post Staff
Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of France’s Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, discusses interim results from the CaboPoint study, which evaluated cabozantinib as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a clear cell component. Disease in the study participants had progressed after prior treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination or combined with VEGF-targeted therapy. (Abstract 606).
The ASCO Post Staff
Neeraj Agarwal, MD, of the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, discusses phase III results from the TALAPRO-2 study, which suggested an improvement in radiographic progression-free survival with the combination of talazoparib and enzalutamide over standard-of-care enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The improvement was seen regardless of homologous recombination repair gene mutations. The combination regimen delayed the time to chemotherapy and worsening in global health status and quality of life. (Abstract LBA17).
