Updates From City of Hope on Renal Cell, Prostate, and Urothelial Cancers
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
Sumanta K. Pal, MD, introduces his City of Hope colleagues, Hedyeh Ebrahimi, MD, MPH, who discusses the prevalence of dietary modification and supplement use in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and Daniela Castro, MSc, who discusses expanding eligibility criteria in kidney, prostate, and urothelial cancer trials to more accurately reflect the real-world population and reducing exclusion criteria. (Abstract 662, 612, 34, 453)
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Sumanta K. Pal, MD:
One of the things I'm super passionate about is mentorship, and I've got some really fantastic residents and fellows and students presenting their work at ASCO GU 2023. One is Hedyeh Ebrahimi, who's a terrific post-doctoral fellow joining our group who hails from Iran. She's presenting some work that pertains to nutritional supplements in our kidney cancer patients and their utilization. Daniela Castro, a terrific post-graduate in my group, applying to medical school soon, is presenting some work that pertains to a clinical trial eligibility really across the spectrum of GU malignancies, including prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. I think you're going to find their work incredibly interesting.
The primary objective of our study was to characterize eligibility criteria in contemporary trials, assessing systemic therapies in patients with advanced kidney, prostate, and urothelial cancer based on ASCO and the Friends of Cancer Research recommendations.
Beginning in 2017, ASCO and Friends of Cancer Research established an initiative to carefully examine eligibility criteria and found that they were largely restrictive and ultimately led to limiting patient accrual, access to investigational treatments, as well as ultimately limiting the generalizability of study results. So our study looked specifically at these three disease settings to assess the content of these eligibility criteria.
We identified eligible trials using the ClinicalTrials.gov database and specifically looked at patients with advanced disease receiving systemic therapies, rather than those on localized treatments or those evaluating prognostic tools in phase one to three trials.
We then stratified the trials we identified into three groups as exclusion, conditional inclusion, or not reported according to the data we had accessible on ClinicalTrials.gov. Ultimately, we found that the vast majority of trials in the RCC space incorporated very exclusionary criteria, specifically with reference to HIV status, hepatitis status, brain metastases, and concurrent malignancies. Similarly, we saw that urothelial cancer studies incorporated these same exclusionary criteria in greater proportions compared to other.
In prostate cancer trials, we found that patients with brain metastases or had HIV positivity, hepatitis positivity, as well as concurrent malignancies were largely reported as exclusion. However, across all three disease spaces, we found that concurrent malignancies were the criteria in which trials tended to be most inclusive toward patients that had either a secondary malignancy that had previously been treated or lower stage disease.
Ultimately, we found that eligibility criteria in these three diseases incorporated restrictive eligibility criteria, and there is a need to update these criteria to reflect the current landscape so that we can include more patients in these trials that can benefit and ultimately serve to reflect the real world population better.
Hedyeh Ebrahimi, MD, MPH:
Mounting data suggests that dietary modification and supplement use may modulate immunotherapy outcomes in cancer treatment. A previous study of our team published in Nature Medicine showed that CBM588, a supplemental, live, [inaudible 00:04:17] bacterial resulted in longer progression-free survival in patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
However, we see that supplement use discussion with patients at clinic may sometimes be dismissed by practitioner. Therefore, we aim to quantify use of these measures among patients with MRCC who were under active combination therapy. To do so, a survey was conducted by Kidney Cancer Research Alliance, KCQ, and non-profit patients advocacy group using the international mailing list in 2022. In our survey, multiple questions were directed to use of supplement and dietary modification.
In our study, we only included patients who were under active combination therapy. Who were 289 out of 1,062 respondents to the survey, we saw that ipilimumab plus nivolumab was the most common first line treatment among our respondent.
Thirty-five percent of our respondents say that they followed new dietary regimen following their cancer treatments. The most common new regimen were Mediterranean and ketogenic diets. Half of the patients reported that they start using supplements secondary to their cancer diagnosis. CBD oil or marijuana, probiotics, and vitamin C were the most common used supplements among our respondent.
We saw that 35% of our patients said that they were skeptical toward alternative treatments. However, 10% said that they think alternative treatments may help shrink the cancer instead of standard approved treatments.
Additionally, only 83% of patients said that they consistently discussed supplement use with their practitioner. As we saw, a considerable proportion of patients use supplements and follow new dietary regimen following cancer treatment as an adjunct to their standard treatment. However, we know that supplement use may modulate cancer treatment outcomes.
Additionally, interventions such as the probiotic use or ketogenic diets are subject of prospective studies in MRCC. Therefore, we believe that practitioners should discuss more carefully supplement use and dietary regimen with their patients at clinic and clinical trial candidate to prevent such confounders.
Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a biomarker analysis from the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The ongoing study aims to identify a predictive biomarker that may potentially guide therapeutic choices. (Abstract 608).
Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, discusses new data from the COSMIC-313 study of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma of IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) intermediate or poor risk. Those who received cabozantinib instead of placebo with nivolumab and ipilimumab as first-line treatment seemed to experience improved progression-free survival. A subgroup analysis suggested the benefit was primarily in patients with an intermediate risk. Follow-up for overall survival is ongoing. (Abstract 605).
Scott T. Tagawa, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, discusses study results showing that, the anti-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) monoclonal antibody J591 with ketoconazole and hydrocortisone, when radiolabeled with lutetium-177, leads to improved 18-month metastasis-free survival vs radiolabeling with indium-111 in patients with nonmetastatic (M0) castration-resistant prostate cancer. This supports the development of anti-PSMA radioimmunotherapy, although the optimal radionuclide and targeting agent are unknown. (Abstract LBA21).
Alan H. Bryce, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, discusses the final results of the primary endpoint of rPFS and interim results on overall survival among patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The data showed that rucaparib improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with either docetaxel or abiraterone and enzalutamide in disease with BRCA1/2 alterations. (Abstract 18).
Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, of the Yale Cancer Center, discusses a primary phase II analysis of the TROPHY-U-01 study, cohort 2, which evaluated sacituzumab govitecan-hziy in platinum-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial cancer that progressed after prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. (Abstract 520).