Matt D. Galsky, MD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: New Study Results on Atezolizumab, Platinum, and Gemcitabine
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
Matt D. Galsky, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Tisch Cancer Institute, discusses final overall survival data from the phase III IMvigor130 study, which compared atezolizumab versus placebo, both of which were paired with platinum and gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. (Abstract LBA440).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
IMvigor130 is a phase 3 study that compared three treatment arms for the first line treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer. Treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy, treatment with atezolizumab the PD-L1 inhibitor, or the combination of platinum-based chemotherapy plus atezolizumab.
The study had co-primary endpoints, progression-free survival comparing chemo versus chemo plus atezo, and overall survival that was a co-primary endpoint as well. The progression-free survival endpoint has previously been reported in the trial MAP that endpoint showing a PFS benefit with chemo plus atezo versus chemo alone.
Overall survival has been assessed at multiple interim analysis, and then at ASCO GU 2023, the final analysis for overall survival. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.85 with an upper bound of the 95% competence interval of one, and it didn't meet the pre-specified threshold for statistical significance. So chemotherapy plus atezolizumab improves progression-free survival, but not overall survival based on the threshold specified in the statistical analysis plan.
The study did show however, that when you look at the type of platinum-based chemotherapy that patients received, if they received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, there did seem to be a beneficial effect combining with atezolizumab versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy. This is hypothesis generating data, but it really highlights the potential importance of the chemotherapy backbone when we combine with immune checkpoint blockade and there's immunologic data that support that clinical finding that's being used to generate hypotheses to be tested in the next generation of clinical trials.
Because chemotherapy plus atezolizumab did not improve overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, this does not impact standard of care as it has in other solid tumors where we see combination of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint blockade becoming a standard of care. But based on the patient population enrolled and the mix of chemotherapy backbones with cisplatin and carboplatin, there is hypothesis generating data that will be tested in future studies to determine whether or not the choice of chemotherapy backbone actually makes the difference when combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade.
The ASCO Post Staff
Scott T. Tagawa, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, discusses study results showing that, the anti-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) monoclonal antibody J591 with ketoconazole and hydrocortisone, when radiolabeled with lutetium-177, leads to improved 18-month metastasis-free survival vs radiolabeling with indium-111 in patients with nonmetastatic (M0) castration-resistant prostate cancer. This supports the development of anti-PSMA radioimmunotherapy, although the optimal radionuclide and targeting agent are unknown. (Abstract LBA21).
The ASCO Post Staff
Aristotelis Bamias, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, discusses results from the phase III IMvigor130 study, which suggest that atezolizumab monotherapy continues to show better tolerability vs chemotherapy for patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. (Abstract LBA441).
The ASCO Post Staff
Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, of the Yale Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-921 study, which was designed to assess the combination of pembrolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. They had not received chemotherapy, but their disease progressed on the next-generation hormonal agent, or they could not tolerate the agent. (Abstract 19).
The ASCO Post Staff
Matt D. Galsky, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Tisch Cancer Institute, discusses results from CheckMate 274, which investigated nivolumab compared with placebo in patients with bladder or upper urinary tract cancer, following radical surgery to remove invasive disease. (Abstract LBA443).
The ASCO Post Staff
Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of France’s Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, discusses interim results from the CaboPoint study, which evaluated cabozantinib as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a clear cell component. Disease in the study participants had progressed after prior treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination or combined with VEGF-targeted therapy. (Abstract 606).