Advertisement


Nick Pavlakis, PhD, MBBS, on Gastroesophageal Cancer: New Findings on the Use of Regorafenib

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Advertisement

Nick Pavlakis, PhD, MBBS, of Australia’s Royal North Shore Hospital, discusses phase III findings from the INTEGRATE IIa study of regorafenib vs placebo in refractory advanced gastroesophageal cancer. The trial provides a platform for the investigation of combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, now underway in the INTEGRATE IIb study, which is evaluating regorafenib plus nivolumab compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with this type of cancer who have received two lines of prior therapy (Abstract LBA294).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The INTEGRATE II clinical trial was a randomized double-blind placebo control trial evaluating the effect of Regorafenib versus placebo on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It followed on from the phase two INTEGRATE trial, which demonstrated progression-free survival with Regorafenib. The study was conducted to see if Regorafenib improved overall survival. It enrolled patients who'd failed at least two lines of prior therapy with a platinum and fluoropyrimidine analog necessary who were of fitness, ECOG zero to one and who had advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It was a multi-center international study led by the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials group. The study was conducted over several years and during the conduct of the study, the evolution of new evidence developed in gastric cancer, such as the findings of LONSURF being active in refractory disease and immunotherapy with nivolumab, as well as the promising activity of Regorafenib nivolumab combination called REGONIVO. So we turn the study into a platform study, continued to evaluate Regorafenib placebo and also undertook the INTEGRATE IIb study, which I'll finish on and describe. The study enrolled 251 patients. The statistical plan was to look at the pooled analysis first of the INTEGRATE phase two and phase three, studied together, and then look at INTEGRATE IIa alone. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.7 in favor of Regorafenib in the pooled analysis and 0.68 in favor of Regorafenib in the standalone INTEGRATE IIa study. The value of Regorafenib in improving survival was best seen in the landmark 12 months survival, which was 19% for Regorafenib versus 6% for placebo. Regorafenib was also shown to prolong progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life, all in favor of Regorafenib. The toxicity observed was similar to that previously reported and also within our phase two study and within the spectrum of toxicities previously noted for Regorafenib and there were mostly grade one and two toxicities that were manageable. So in conclusion, the INTEGRATE IIa study demonstrated that Regorafenib in patients refractory to chemotherapy, some of whom have been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and VGF inhibitors, did prolong survival in addition to progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life. The evidence is best observed in terms of patient benefit by the 19% survival finding at one year versus 6% for placebo. So we think this study offers a new option for patients with refractory advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. We also thought it formed a platform for combination therapy and we've taken the REGONIVO combination now into the INTEGRATE IIb study, which is evaluating Regorafenib and nivolumab combined in versus chemotherapy in patients who have failed at least two lines of prior chemotherapy. The INTEGRATE II clinical trial was a randomized double-blind placebo control trial evaluating the effect of Regorafenib versus placebo on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It followed on from the phase two INTEGRATE trial, which demonstrated progression-free survival with Regorafenib. The study was conducted to see if Regorafenib improved overall survival. It enrolled patients who'd failed at least two lines of prior therapy with a platinum and fluoropyrimidine analog necessary who were of fitness, ECOG zero to one and who had advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. It was a multi-center international study led by the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials group. The study was conducted over several years and during the conduct of the study, the evolution of new evidence developed in gastric cancer, such as the findings of LONSURF being active in refractory disease and immunotherapy with nivolumab, as well as the promising activity of Regorafenib nivolumab combination called REGONIVO. So we turn the study into a platform study, continued to evaluate Regorafenib placebo and also undertook the INTEGRATE IIb study, which I'll finish on and describe. The study enrolled 251 patients. The statistical plan was to look at the pooled analysis first of the INTEGRATE phase two and phase three, studied together, and then look at INTEGRATE IIa alone. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.7 in favor of Regorafenib in the pooled analysis and 0.68 in favor of Regorafenib in the standalone INTEGRATE IIa study. The value of Regorafenib in improving survival was best seen in the landmark 12 months survival, which was 19% for Regorafenib versus 6% for placebo. Regorafenib was also shown to prolong progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life, all in favor of Regorafenib. The toxicity observed was similar to that previously reported and also within our phase two study and within the spectrum of toxicities previously noted for Regorafenib and there were mostly grade one and two toxicities that were manageable. So in conclusion, the INTEGRATE IIa study demonstrated that Regorafenib in patients refractory to chemotherapy, some of whom have been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and VGF inhibitors, did prolong survival in addition to progression-free survival and delay deterioration in global quality of life. The evidence is best observed in terms of patient benefit by the 19% survival finding at one year versus 6% for placebo. So we think this study offers a new option for patients with refractory advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. We also thought it formed a platform for combination therapy and we've taken the REGONIVO combination now into the INTEGRATE IIb study, which is evaluating Regorafenib and nivolumab combined in versus chemotherapy in patients who have failed at least two lines of prior chemotherapy.

Related Videos

Gastroesophageal Cancer
Gastrointestinal Cancer

Kohei Shitara, MD, on Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Recent Data on Zolbetuximab Plus mFOLFOX6

Kohei Shitara, MD, of Japan’s National Cancer Center Hospital East, discusses the SPOTLIGHT study’s phase III findings on zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with the biomarker claudin-18.2–positive and HER2-negative locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The regimen seems to have led to an improvement in both progression-free and overall survival, with survival benefits also observed across most subgroups. Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 is potentially a new standard-of-care treatment for this population (Abstract LBA292).

Pancreatic Cancer

Zev A. Wainberg, MD, on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Recent Findings on NALIRIFOX vs Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine

Zev A. Wainberg, MD, of the UCLA School of Medicine, discusses phase III findings from the NAPOLI-3 trial, which showed that first-line NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin) improved overall and progression-free survival compared with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The safety profile of NALIRIFOX was manageable and consistent with the profiles of each agent (Abstract LBA661).

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Souya Nunobe, MD, PhD, on Gastric Cancer: 5-Year Follow-up on S-1 Chemotherapy for Stage II Disease

Souya Nunobe, MD, PhD, of Japan’s Cancer Institute Hospital and the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, discusses 5-year follow-up results of the phase III OPAS-1 trial, which compared four and eight courses of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II gastric cancer. These final follow-up findings confirmed the benefit of S-1 and its use for 1 year to treat this population (Abstract 381).

Gastrointestinal Cancer
Immunotherapy

Manik A. Amin, MD, on Novel Immune Therapies in GI Cancers: What’s on the Horizon?

Manik A. Amin, MD, of Dartmouth Cancer Center, discusses the future of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers, the challenges of creating effective adoptive cell therapies, and the next generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Laura A. Dawson, MD, on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastases: Recent Treatment Data on Palliative Radiotherapy

Laura A. Dawson, MD, of Canada’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, discusses phase III findings showing that compared with best supportive care alone, single-fraction whole-liver radiation therapy appears to improve hepatic pain in the majority of patients with treatment-refractory or -ineligible hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases. In addition, the data indicated a trend for improved 3-month survival with radiation therapy (Abstract LBA492).

 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement