Advertisement


Reid Merryman, MD, on High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Reid Merryman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses his findings on the regimen of epcoritamab plus rituximab and lenalidomide for patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma. Regardless of whether their disease progressed within 24 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy, this regimen showed antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Epcoritamab, a subcutaneous T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody, may abrogate the negative effects of high-risk features (Abstract 7506).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year I presented updated results from Epcoritamab plus R2 for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Each of those three drugs, rituximab, lenalidomide, and epcoritamab, has different modes of action. It was hypothesized that lenalidomide with its immunomodulatory properties might enhance the activity of epcoritamab. In this study, patients received R2 over 12 cycles using standard dosing and two different doses of epcoritamab were tested, two different dose schedules. In arm 2A, patients received more frequent epcoritamab dosing, dosed weekly for the first three cycles, every two weeks for cycles four through seven, and every four weeks thereafter. Whereas an arm 2B, less frequent epcoritamab dosing was used every week for the first two cycles, and every four weeks thereafter. In total 111 patients were treated and they had received a median of one prior line of therapy. Notably, patients had many high risk features in this cohort. Approximately 60% of patients had Stage 4 disease. About 40% of patients had progression of disease within the first two years of chemoimmunotherapy treatment, so-called POD24 patients, and approximately 60% of patients had a high risk FLIPI score. The safety profile for this combination was similar to previous reports. The most common side effects included cytokine release syndrome, infections, and neutropenia. CRS was seen in about half of patients, but was primarily low grade with only 2% of patients having Grade 3 or higher CRS. CRS occurred over a predictable timeline. Almost all CRS occurred over the first two cycles, and most CRS occurred after the first full dose of epcoritamab, which was given on cycle one, day 15. Notably, CRS resolved in all patients and no patients discontinued epcoritamab based on cytokine release syndrome. Among all patients the overall response rate was 98%, and the complete metabolic response rate was 87%, both of which are very high for this disease setting. Notably, all patients did well, including those with high risk features like POD24, primary refractory disease or high FLIPI scores. With almost a median of one year of follow-up, the one-year progression-free survival was 78% and the one-year duration of complete response was 89% suggesting that these responses are durable, at least so far. Responses seem to be durable for all patient subgroups, including those with POD24. I think our data suggests that this combination leads to deep and so far quite durable responses with a manageable safety profile. Based on this encouraging data, there's an ongoing randomized Phase 3 trial comparing R2 to R2 plus epcoritamab among patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. More broadly, I think this trial adds to a growing number of studies that suggest that CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies are a very potent treatment for follicular lymphoma and will likely be an important part of our treatment for FL patients in the years to come.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, on Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Standard Treatment

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South and the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, discuss phase III results from the Scandinavian NeoCol trial, which showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in terms of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colon cancer, although there are certain circumstances when this approach may have more favorable outcomes (Abstract LBA3503).

Lung Cancer
Immunotherapy

Narjust Florez, MD, and Heather A. Wakelee, MD, on Early-Stage NSCLC: Phase III Findings From KEYNOTE-671 on Pembrolizumab and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Heather A. Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University, Stanford Cancer Institute, discuss new data supporting neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant pembrolizumab as a promising new treatment option for patients with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA100).

Lymphoma

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, on Primary Refractory and Early Relapsing DLBCL: Therapeutic Options

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, of University of Colorado Hospital, discusses the treatment landscape for the 30% to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease will relapse. Patients who experience relapse within 1 year of chemoimmunotherapy have poor outcomes with autotransplantation, but chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has shown efficacy and manageable toxicity.

Breast Cancer

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, on Early Breast Cancer and Weight Loss: Results From the BWEL Trial

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a telephone-based weight loss intervention that induced clinically meaningful weight loss in patients with breast cancer who had overweight and obesity, across demographic and tumor factors. Additional tailoring of the intervention may possibly enhance weight loss in Black and younger patients as well (Abstract 12001).

Lung Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Narjust Florez, MD, and Ferdinandos Skoulidis, MD, PhD, on NSCLC: Findings on Sotorasib vs Docetaxel in the CodeBreaK 200 Trial

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ferdinandos Skoulidis, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss results of a biomarker subgroup analysis, showing that sotorasib demonstrated consistent clinical benefit vs docetaxel in all molecularly defined subgroups of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although no predictive biomarkers were confirmed, novel hypothesis-generating signals were observed (Abstract 9008).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement