Advertisement


Reid Merryman, MD, on High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Reid Merryman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses his findings on the regimen of epcoritamab plus rituximab and lenalidomide for patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma. Regardless of whether their disease progressed within 24 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy, this regimen showed antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Epcoritamab, a subcutaneous T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody, may abrogate the negative effects of high-risk features (Abstract 7506).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year I presented updated results from Epcoritamab plus R2 for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Each of those three drugs, rituximab, lenalidomide, and epcoritamab, has different modes of action. It was hypothesized that lenalidomide with its immunomodulatory properties might enhance the activity of epcoritamab. In this study, patients received R2 over 12 cycles using standard dosing and two different doses of epcoritamab were tested, two different dose schedules. In arm 2A, patients received more frequent epcoritamab dosing, dosed weekly for the first three cycles, every two weeks for cycles four through seven, and every four weeks thereafter. Whereas an arm 2B, less frequent epcoritamab dosing was used every week for the first two cycles, and every four weeks thereafter. In total 111 patients were treated and they had received a median of one prior line of therapy. Notably, patients had many high risk features in this cohort. Approximately 60% of patients had Stage 4 disease. About 40% of patients had progression of disease within the first two years of chemoimmunotherapy treatment, so-called POD24 patients, and approximately 60% of patients had a high risk FLIPI score. The safety profile for this combination was similar to previous reports. The most common side effects included cytokine release syndrome, infections, and neutropenia. CRS was seen in about half of patients, but was primarily low grade with only 2% of patients having Grade 3 or higher CRS. CRS occurred over a predictable timeline. Almost all CRS occurred over the first two cycles, and most CRS occurred after the first full dose of epcoritamab, which was given on cycle one, day 15. Notably, CRS resolved in all patients and no patients discontinued epcoritamab based on cytokine release syndrome. Among all patients the overall response rate was 98%, and the complete metabolic response rate was 87%, both of which are very high for this disease setting. Notably, all patients did well, including those with high risk features like POD24, primary refractory disease or high FLIPI scores. With almost a median of one year of follow-up, the one-year progression-free survival was 78% and the one-year duration of complete response was 89% suggesting that these responses are durable, at least so far. Responses seem to be durable for all patient subgroups, including those with POD24. I think our data suggests that this combination leads to deep and so far quite durable responses with a manageable safety profile. Based on this encouraging data, there's an ongoing randomized Phase 3 trial comparing R2 to R2 plus epcoritamab among patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. More broadly, I think this trial adds to a growing number of studies that suggest that CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies are a very potent treatment for follicular lymphoma and will likely be an important part of our treatment for FL patients in the years to come.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, on Early Breast Cancer and Weight Loss: Results From the BWEL Trial

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a telephone-based weight loss intervention that induced clinically meaningful weight loss in patients with breast cancer who had overweight and obesity, across demographic and tumor factors. Additional tailoring of the intervention may possibly enhance weight loss in Black and younger patients as well (Abstract 12001).

Ajay K. Nooka, MBBS, on High-Risk Myeloma: Data on Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone

Ajay K. Nooka, MBBS, of Winship Cancer Center of Emory University, discusses phase II findings showing that, in patients with high-risk myeloma, maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone deepened responses. Measurable residual disease negativity was attained in 80% of patients.

Bladder Cancer

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: New Data on Erdafitinib vs Chemotherapy From the THOR Study

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings showing that for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alteration who already had been treated with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, erdafitinib significantly improved overall and progression-free survival, as well as overall response rate, compared with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (LBA4619).

Lymphoma

Tycel J. Phillips, MD, and Alex F. Herrera, MD, on DLBCL: New Data on ctDNA Status and Clinical Outcomes

Tycel J. Phillips, MD, and Alex F. Herrera, MD, both of the City of Hope National Medical Center, discuss findings from the POLARIX study, which provided the largest prospectively collected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data set on patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Achieving ctDNA-negative status was associated with improved outcomes when patients were treated with polatuzumab vedotin-piiq plus combination chemotherapy vs combination chemotherapy alone (Abstract 7523).

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement