Advertisement


Reid Merryman, MD, on High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Reid Merryman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses his findings on the regimen of epcoritamab plus rituximab and lenalidomide for patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma. Regardless of whether their disease progressed within 24 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy, this regimen showed antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Epcoritamab, a subcutaneous T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody, may abrogate the negative effects of high-risk features (Abstract 7506).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year I presented updated results from Epcoritamab plus R2 for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Each of those three drugs, rituximab, lenalidomide, and epcoritamab, has different modes of action. It was hypothesized that lenalidomide with its immunomodulatory properties might enhance the activity of epcoritamab. In this study, patients received R2 over 12 cycles using standard dosing and two different doses of epcoritamab were tested, two different dose schedules. In arm 2A, patients received more frequent epcoritamab dosing, dosed weekly for the first three cycles, every two weeks for cycles four through seven, and every four weeks thereafter. Whereas an arm 2B, less frequent epcoritamab dosing was used every week for the first two cycles, and every four weeks thereafter. In total 111 patients were treated and they had received a median of one prior line of therapy. Notably, patients had many high risk features in this cohort. Approximately 60% of patients had Stage 4 disease. About 40% of patients had progression of disease within the first two years of chemoimmunotherapy treatment, so-called POD24 patients, and approximately 60% of patients had a high risk FLIPI score. The safety profile for this combination was similar to previous reports. The most common side effects included cytokine release syndrome, infections, and neutropenia. CRS was seen in about half of patients, but was primarily low grade with only 2% of patients having Grade 3 or higher CRS. CRS occurred over a predictable timeline. Almost all CRS occurred over the first two cycles, and most CRS occurred after the first full dose of epcoritamab, which was given on cycle one, day 15. Notably, CRS resolved in all patients and no patients discontinued epcoritamab based on cytokine release syndrome. Among all patients the overall response rate was 98%, and the complete metabolic response rate was 87%, both of which are very high for this disease setting. Notably, all patients did well, including those with high risk features like POD24, primary refractory disease or high FLIPI scores. With almost a median of one year of follow-up, the one-year progression-free survival was 78% and the one-year duration of complete response was 89% suggesting that these responses are durable, at least so far. Responses seem to be durable for all patient subgroups, including those with POD24. I think our data suggests that this combination leads to deep and so far quite durable responses with a manageable safety profile. Based on this encouraging data, there's an ongoing randomized Phase 3 trial comparing R2 to R2 plus epcoritamab among patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. More broadly, I think this trial adds to a growing number of studies that suggest that CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies are a very potent treatment for follicular lymphoma and will likely be an important part of our treatment for FL patients in the years to come.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer
Immunotherapy

Jason J. Luke, MD, on Melanoma Adjuvant Therapy: Final Analysis of KEYNOTE-716

Jason J. Luke, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, discusses adjuvant pembrolizumab, which, in previous results, improved distant metastasis– and recurrence-free survival in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma vs placebo. After a median follow-up of 39.4 months, adjuvant pembrolizumab continued to show a benefit over placebo, with no new safety signals (Abstract LBA9505).

Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Supportive Care

Aaron T. Gerds, MD, on Anemia in Myelofibrosis: New Data on Treatment With Luspatercept

Aaron T. Gerds, MD, of Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, talks about treating the anemia many patients with myelofibrosis experience because of JAK inhibitor therapy. The ACE-536-MF-001 study showed that luspatercept improved anemia and transfusion burden in this population, with a safety profile consistent with that in previous studies (Abstract 7016).

Lung Cancer

Nagla Abdel Karim, MD, on Small Cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S1929 Results on Atezolizumab Plus Talazoparib

Nagla Abdel Karim, MD, of the Inova Schar Cancer Institute, University of Virginia, discusses phase II data showing that maintenance atezolizumab plus talazoparib improved progression-free survival in Schlafen-11–selected patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting biomarker-selected trials in this disease, paving the way for future evaluation of novel therapies in selected populations (Abstract 8504).

CNS Cancers

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, on Glioma: Phase III Results on Vorasidenib

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, both of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss findings from the INDIGO trial showing that the IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib improves progression-free survival for patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation. These data demonstrate the clinical benefit of vorasidenib in this patient population for whom chemotherapy and radiotherapy are being delayed.

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, on Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Standard Treatment

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South and the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, discuss phase III results from the Scandinavian NeoCol trial, which showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in terms of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colon cancer, although there are certain circumstances when this approach may have more favorable outcomes (Abstract LBA3503).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement