Advertisement


Jonathan W. Riess, MD, on EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: What’s Next?

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Jonathan W. Riess, MD, of the University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, explores the findings of three important clinical trials in lung cancer treatment: whether to incorporate immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment of EGFR-mutated lung cancer, the importance of central nervous system activity in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, and new therapies for disease with EGFR exon 20 insertion.



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Jonathan W. Riess, MD: At this ASCO 2023 annual meeting, I'm speaking on EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: What's next? And I'll be discussing three important abstracts that will be presented at the oral session for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The first abstract is KEYNOTE 789, which is adding pembrolizumab immunotherapy to platinum pemetrexed based chemotherapy. It's a clinical trial that randomizes patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who've progressed on prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor to either chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab. And this is an important study because patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer were excluded from many of the pivotal chemo-immunotherapy clinical trials in the past, because we think of these tumors as being less responsive to single agent immunotherapy. And in this study there was no clear progression-free survival or overall survival benefit with the addition of pembrolizumab to platinum pemetrexed based chemotherapy. This study highlights the importance of better selecting patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer for that small population that might benefit from immunotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, as well as, other potential factors that may potentiate the immune response. Within this study, it looked like patients whose tumors had positive PD-L1 expression might do slightly better, but once again, no overall survival or progression-free survival benefit was shown. So it is not clear and it does not show that immunotherapy added to chemotherapy provides any benefit to these patients. There are further studies looking at the combination of immunotherapy with anti-angiogenesis agents in combination with chemotherapy, and there may be some potentiation of immune activity with that anti-angiogenesis immunotherapy ICI interaction. But we still have yet to see an overall survival benefit from studies already conducted, and we eagerly await the results of future studies. For the second abstract I will be discussing, it's zorifertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. This trial, conducted in Asia, randomized patients to a highly CNS penetrant, EGFR TKI zorifertinib versus first-generation EGFR TKI erlotinib or gefitinib. And in this study for patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with active untreated asymptomatic brain metastases, zorifertinib improved progression-free survival compared to erlotinib or gefitinib and also had an increased PFS in terms of intracranial progression. Now, osimertinib is also an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high CNS penetration and has shown a progression-free survival and overall survival benefit compared to gefitinib or erlotinib. But this drug may not be available at all places in the world, although it's the standard of care in the United States. And so, it's unclear right now if this will change the standard of care of the future because of osimertinib being used in the first-line setting in the United States and Europe in many parts of the world. The third abstract I'll be discussing is sunvozertinib and EGFR Exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer. These are uncommon EGFR-mutations, yet important ones. They're the third most common EGFR activating mutation. About 10 to 12% of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. And there's been a number of advances recently with the FDA approval of amivantamab and mobocertinib after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. Sunvozertinib was studied in the WU-KONG6 study, which I will be discussing, and that showed, in patients who have had prior treatment for EGFR Exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer, a response rate of 60.8%, which looks favorable in the context of other recently approved Exon 20 agents such as amivantamab and mobocertinib. Sunvozertinib has favorable activity with response rate of 60.8% in the WU-KONG6 trial. It also appears to have CNS activity, which is important and compares very favorably to current FDA approved agents amivantamab and mobocertinib. Some unanswered questions are the sequencing of Exon 20 agents, as well as, potential combinations strategies in the future, but this looks like to be an exciting drug that's being developed further.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, and Zeynep Eroglu, MD, on Metastatic Melanoma: New Data on Dabrafenib, Trametinib, and Navitoclax

Allison Betof Warner, MD, PhD, of Stanford University Medical Center, and Zeynep Eroglu, MD, of H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, discusses phase II findings showing that in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, dabrafenib plus trametinib and navitoclax (DTN) was associated with a complete response rate of 20% and an overall response rate of 84%. Additionally, there was a trend toward improved overall survival in patients treated with DTN compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib alone; the difference in overall survival was more pronounced in patients with a smaller tumor burden (Abstract 9511).

Lung Cancer

Narjust Florez, MD, and Ticiana Leal, MD, on Metastatic NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields Therapy After Platinum Resistance

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ticiana Leal, MD, of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the use of tumor treating fields therapy, in which electric fields disrupt processes critical for cancer cell viability. Already approved by the FDA to treat glioblastoma and mesothelioma, the treatment has extended overall survival in this phase III study of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, without exacerbating systemic toxicities (Abstract LBA9005).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Karim Fizazi, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Phase III Results on Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide as First-Line Treatment

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Karim Fizazi, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, discuss findings from the TALAPRO-2 study, which showed that talazoparib plus enzalutamide improved radiographic progression–free survival over standard-of-care enzalutamide as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and HRR gene alterations. This regimen also delayed the time to deterioration in global health status and quality of life (Abstract 5004).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Praful Ravi, MRCP, MBBChir, on Localized Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Impact of PSA Nadir

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Praful Ravi, MRCP, MBBChir, both of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discuss an individual patient-data analysis of randomized trials from the ICECAP collaborative. A PSA nadir of ≥ 0.1 ng/mL within 6 months after radiotherapy completion was prognostic for prostate cancer–specific, metastasis-free, and overall survival in patients receiving radiotherapy plus androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. These findings may help identify patients for therapy de-escalation trials (Abstract 5002).

Global Cancer Care
Leukemia

Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, on Surviving Childhood Leukemia Near the Border of the United States and Mexico

Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, of the University of California, San Diego, and Rady Children’s Hospital, talks about using a health systems strengthening approach to improve leukemia care and survival in a public Mexican hospital in the region of the border between the United States and Mexico. The demonstrated increase in overall survival across a decade after implementation of the program seems to validate the use of such models, not only to improve clinical outcomes, but also to build sustainable hospital capacity, financially and organizationally (Abstract 1502).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement