Advertisement


Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Resected Melanoma: Biomarkers for and Efficacy of Adjuvant Nivolumab vs Placebo

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses new data showing that patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma who were treated with adjuvant nivolumab had prolonged recurrence-free survival compared with placebo across all biomarker subgroups. The baseline biomarkers most predictive of prolonged recurrence-free survival with nivolumab were high interferon gamma score, high tumor mutational burden, CD8 T-cell infiltration, and low C-reactive protein (Abstract 9504).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Georgina V. Long: Resected Stage 2B and 2C melanoma has a very poor prognosis. In fact, at five years, patients with stage 2C melanoma have a 45% risk of recurrence. And for stage 2B melanoma, 35% risk of recurrence. The survival of this group of patients is worse than that of stage 3A melanoma and the survival of stage 2C melanoma is equivalent to the survival of stage 3B melanoma. This is a poor prognostic group. Checkmate 76K explored adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in resected stage 2B and 2C melanoma in patients who had undergone a wide local excision and a sentinel node biopsy, which was negative. 790 patients were randomized two to one to nivolumab versus placebo. We've already seen the relapse-free survival primary analysis last year, and there was a 58% reduction in the risk of recurrence with adjuvant nivolumab. We are now presenting the exploratory biomarker analysis from this trial. So baseline, primary melanoma tissue, and baseline CRP, serum CRP was correlated with outcome within each arm and versus each arm. And what we found was that for every biomarker subgroup, nivolumab improved the relapse-free survival over placebo. And this included tumor mutation burden, interferon gamma, PD-L1 expression at baseline, CD8 infiltration at baseline, the CRP. So when we compared the prognostic biomarkers overall in the trial, we found that the two factors that were most important for prognosis, so predicting recurrence in the total trial population, that was the CRP and the stage. However, when we did our multivariate model to look at what was predictive of best outcome with adjuvant nivolumab over placebo, we found that the baseline biomarkers that were predictive or most predictive were the interferon gamma at baseline and the tumor mutation burden. Our next steps are to make a multifactorial model, which includes both clinical and tissue biomarkers to predict outcome of patients with resected 2B and 2C melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab.

Related Videos

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Amer Methqal Zeidan, MBBS, MHS, on Myelodysplastic Syndromes: New Data From the IMerge Study of Imetelstat

Amer Methqal Zeidan, MBBS, MHS, of Yale University and Yale Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings on the first-in-class telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, which was given to patients with heavily transfusion-dependent non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes that are resistant to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Imetelstat resulted in a significant and sustained red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence in 40% of these heavily transfused patients. The response was also durable and accompanied by an impressive median hemoglobin rise of 3.6 g/dL, and seen in patients with and without ring sideroblasts. Importantly, reduced variant allele frequency was observed in the most commonly mutated myeloid genes which correlated with duration of transfusion independence and hemoglobin rise, therefore suggesting a disease-modifying potential of this agent (Abstract 7004).

Lung Cancer
Immunotherapy

Jonathan W. Riess, MD, on EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: What’s Next?

Jonathan W. Riess, MD, of the University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, explores the findings of three important clinical trials in lung cancer treatment: whether to incorporate immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment of EGFR-mutated lung cancer, the importance of central nervous system activity in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, and new therapies for disease with EGFR exon 20 insertion.

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Leukemia

Claire Roddie, PhD, MBChB, on B-ALL: Safety and Efficacy Data of Obecabtagene Autoleucel

Claire Roddie, PhD, MBChB, of University College London, discusses results of the FELIX study, which showed that the second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy obecabtagene autoleucel is safe for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, even those with a high burden of disease. This agent yielded high rates of complete response and ongoing CAR T-cell persistence in most patients whose disease responded (Abstract 7000).

Lymphoma

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, on Primary Refractory and Early Relapsing DLBCL: Therapeutic Options

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, of University of Colorado Hospital, discusses the treatment landscape for the 30% to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease will relapse. Patients who experience relapse within 1 year of chemoimmunotherapy have poor outcomes with autotransplantation, but chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has shown efficacy and manageable toxicity.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement