Advertisement


Yara Abdou, MD, on Race and Clinical Outcomes in the RxPONDER Breast Cancer Trial

2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Advertisement

Yara Abdou, MD, of the University of North Carolina, discusses results from the RxPONDER SWOG S1007 study, which showed that non-Hispanic Black women with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with one to three involved lymph nodes and a recurrence score of ≤ 25 have worse outcomes than non-Hispanic White women. In addition, Black patients were more likely to accept treatment assignment than their White counterparts and were just as likely to remain on estrogen therapy at 6 and 12 months, suggesting that outcome differences may be less likely attributable to lack of treatment compliance within the first year (Abstract GS1-01 ).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes continue to be a major healthcare challenge. US Black women have similar incidents, yet 40% higher breast cancer mortality, compared to white women. Therefore, more studies are needed to improve outcomes for minority women with breast cancer. Our study, in particular, focused on determining whether there were racial disparities in the RxPONDER trial. The RxPONDER trial is what established the clinical utility of the 21 gene recurrence score in hormone positive lymph node positive breast cancer. Our study objectives included looking at clinical pathological characteristics by race, analyzing clinical outcomes by race, and determining whether race had any effect on treatment benefit. This study included about 4,048 women with hormone positive lymph node positive breast cancer and known race and ethnicity. When looking at clinical characteristics, we did not find any significant differences in number of positive lymph nodes or tumor size across all racial cohorts. Additionally, the recurrence score distribution also was pretty similar across all racial cohorts. However, the histologic grade was significantly different where non-Hispanic Black patients were noted to have fewer low grade tumors and more high grade tumors, compared to non-Hispanic whites. In regards to outcomes, non-Hispanic Black patients had inferior invasive disease-free survival and inferior distant relapse-free survival, compared to non-Hispanic whites. On the other hand, Asians had superior outcomes, compared to non-Hispanic whites and other racial cohorts. In a multi-variable model, when we adjusted for recurrence score, treatment arm, age, and grade, it did not alter the impact of race, and we continued to note worse outcomes for non-Hispanic Blacks, suggesting that race is independently prognostic. In terms of treatment effect, there was no significant interaction between race and treatment arm. However, there were a limited number of events in the non-Hispanic Black cohort. Therefore, definitive conclusions on whether race has any effect on treatment benefits cannot be made at this time. Our studies, similar to prior studies, indicate racial disparities in breast cancer, particularly in the hormone positive group. Therefore, more studies are needed to improve outcomes for these patients. Next steps of our research will include looking at possible causes of these noted disparities, so we will be looking at a tumor biology differences by race, particularly gene groups, across all racial cohorts. We will also be looking at non-biological factors, including social determinants of health, because being on a clinical trial doesn't guarantee equal access to care. And treatment can still defer within a clinical trial.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Sean Khozin, MD, MPH, on Randomized Trials vs Real-World Evidence in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Sean Khozin, MD, MPH, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, discusses the “external validity deficits” of randomized clinical trials, which still involve only about 5% of adults with cancer, who may differ in important ways from real-world populations. Dr. Khozin describes the reasons for low levels of participation and advocates for capturing the experience of patients not represented in traditional clinical trials, so real-world data can address these validity deficits.

Breast Cancer

Andrea De Censi, MD, on Noninvasive Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results on Low-Dose Tamoxifen

Andrea De Censi, MD, PhD, of Italy’s E.O. Ospedali Galliera, discusses phase III findings showing that low-dose tamoxifen (so-called babytam) given for 3 years still significantly prevents recurrences from noninvasive breast cancer after a median of 7 years from treatment cessation. Babytam at 5 mg/d for 3 years significantly lowered recurrence from noninvasive breast cancer at 10 years without “excess” adverse events (Abstract GS4-08).

 

Breast Cancer

Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, on Camizestrant vs Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer: New Phase II Results

Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, discusses findings from the SERENA-2 trial, which compared the next-generation selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant to fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Camizestrant, which can be taken as a daily pill (as opposed to fulvestrant, which must be given via injection), improved progression-free survival by up to 42% (Abstract GS3-02).

 

Breast Cancer

François-Clément Bidard, MD, PhD: Circulating Tumor Cells May Help Improve Outcomes in Metastatic Disease

François-Clément Bidard, MD, PhD, of the Institut Curie, discusses overall survival results from the STIC CTC trial. To guide the choice between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for patients with metastatic, estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, researchers compared circulating tumor cell (CTC) count to physician’s choice of treatment. The data suggest that the CTC count resulted in better long-term outcomes (Abstract GS3-09).

Breast Cancer

Prudence A. Francis, MD, on Premenopausal ER-Positive Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

Prudence A. Francis, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses an update of the SOFT trial, which showed that adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to adjuvant tamoxifen for premenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer reduces the risk of recurrence. OFS enables the use of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to tamoxifen, which can further reduce recurrence of ER-positive, HER2-negative disease. Very young women—those younger than 35 years old—should be considered for OFS, according to Dr. Francis. In addition, tamoxifen alone is appropriate in women with low-risk clinical-pathologic features.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement