Per Karlsson, MD, PhD: New Data on Breast-Conserving Surgery, With or Without Radiotherapy
2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
Per Karlsson, MD, PhD, of Sweden’s University of Gothenburg and the Sahlgrenska Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results from the POLAR study, which was a meta-analysis of three clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy. POLAR is the first genomic classifier that appears not only to be prognostic for locoregional recurrence, but also predictive of radiotherapy benefit. Although patients with breast cancer who had a high POLAR score benefited from radiotherapy, patients with a low score did not, and may be candidates for omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (Abstract GS4-03).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We have performed a patient level meta-analysis and we have included three different studies, studies randomizing patients to radiotherapy or no radiotherapy. The studies included were the Swede BCD 921 study, the Princess Margaret study, and the Scottish Conservation RT Trial. The patient level meta-analysis has the objective to analyze the performance of the POLAR signature as a prognosticator for locoregional recurrences in the new RT arm and also as a potential predictive assay for radiotherapy benefit.
It's well known that radiotherapy reduces the risk for locoregional recurrences in all different clinical subgroups today. There are definitely some need to find new classifiers to understand which patient we can omit the radiotherapy for.
We have within the Swedish trial identified a signature for RT remission, but that signature must be validated in further studies. Now we have performed this patient-level meta-analysis, but to send some word about the development of the signature in the Swedish study, we have collected all the blocks from the tumors and we have punched the tissues and isolated RNA, and this RNA has given us gene expression info. We have used array-based methods for that.
Using this information, we have filtered the genes most prognostic for locoregional recurrences in the new RT arm. We have further [inaudible 00:01:52] the genes at the enrichment analysis. This filtering has resulted in genes that were fed into a regression model. This regression model resulted in the POLAR score.
The POLAR score consists of 16 genes. The gene functions here is about immune response and also about proliferation. Now we have used this POLAR score and applied that in this patient meta-analysis, and we could see that POLAR could prognosticate the locoregional recurrence in all the new RT arm in all these three different studies. We also find that the POLAR RT had a significant interaction, which means that this classifier is a predictive for radiotherapy benefit. But all this has been done retrospectively. So going further to use it in clinical practice, I think we need further validation, but this is, to our knowledge, the first genomic classifier that can predict radiotherapy benefit. So hopefully in the future we can use this assay to know which patient we can omit radiation. So that's the way forward for us.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses phase II results from the TRIO-US B-12 TALENT study, which showed that patients with localized, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-low breast cancer who are treated with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) in the neoadjuvant setting had an overall response rate (ORR) of 68%. When combined with anastrozole, T-DXd led to a 58% ORR. This is the first trial to evaluate T-DXd in HER2-low breast cancer, a potentially curable disease (Abstract GS2-03).
The ASCO Post Staff
Erica L. Mayer, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses findings from the PACE study of patients with endocrine- and CDK4/6 inhibitor–pretreated estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were randomly assigned to fulvestrant alone; fulvestrant and palbociclib; or fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab. Combining palbociclib with fulvestrant beyond disease progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor regimen did not improve progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone. A longer progression-free survival when a PD-L1 inhibitor was added to fulvestrant and palbociclib deserves further study. A baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis suggests that the potential benefit of palbociclib after progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor may be influenced by ESR1 or PIK3CA status (Abstract GS3-06).
The ASCO Post Staff
Joseph A. Sparano, MD, of the Tisch Cancer Center at Mount Sinai Health System, discusses long-term clinical outcomes data that continue to show many women with early breast cancer can safely forgo chemotherapy, when guided by the 21-gene recurrence score result. The longer follow-up also showed that recurrences of breast cancer continue to occur years after the original diagnosis, although these recurrences were not prevented by chemotherapy use. Racial disparities were not explained by inequities in social determinants of health or treatment adherence, with Black women at higher risk of early recurrence within the first 5 years of diagnosis, but not later recurrence after 5 years (Abstract GS1-05).
The ASCO Post Staff
Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of London’s Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, discusses phase III results from the CAPItello-291 clinical trial, which showed that in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative tumors resistant to aromatase inhibitors, adding the investigational AKT inhibitor capivasertib to fulvestrant doubled the median progression-free survival compared with placebo plus fulvestrant (Abstract GS3-04).
The ASCO Post Staff
Prudence A. Francis, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses an update of the SOFT trial, which showed that adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to adjuvant tamoxifen for premenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer reduces the risk of recurrence. OFS enables the use of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to tamoxifen, which can further reduce recurrence of ER-positive, HER2-negative disease. Very young women—those younger than 35 years old—should be considered for OFS, according to Dr. Francis. In addition, tamoxifen alone is appropriate in women with low-risk clinical-pathologic features.
