Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, on Interrupting Breast Cancer Treatment to Attempt Pregnancy
2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses results from the POSITIVE trial, which showed that a temporary interruption of endocrine therapy in women with hormone-responsive breast cancer in order to attempt pregnancy, does not affect short-term disease outcomes. The study found that 74% of women had at least one pregnancy, most (70%) within 2 years. Birth defects were low (2%) and were not clearly associated with treatment exposure. Dr. Partridge explains that these data stress the need to incorporate patient-centered reproductive health care in the treatment and follow-up of young women with breast cancer (Abstract GS4-09).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The POSITIVE trial was designed to address the clinical conundrum that many of our young patients face, which is the desire to have the best breast cancer therapy possible, as well as the desire to have a child, a future biologic child, and to carry it, if they're able to. Especially for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, where there's been historical concern that having a pregnancy might be akin to pouring gasoline on the flames, we've worried that that may increase the risk of a breast cancer recurrence and poor outcomes. There are retrospective data that suggests safety, but the positive trial is the first prospective trial to address this issue.
Women in the PSOTIVE trial were enrolled if they desired pregnancy and had taken at least 18, and up to 30, months of endocrine therapy. They had to be age 42 or younger and remain premenopausal and have no evidence of clinical recurrence. They enrolled and then had a mandatory three-month washout to get rid of the endocrine therapy, and then they were encouraged to get pregnant, carry that pregnancy, nurse if they wanted to, and resume endocrine therapy, all ideally within two years. They're being followed for their breast cancer outcomes as well as their fertility and offspring outcomes.
The results of the POSITIVE trial revealed that the recurrence rates, both breast cancer-free interval as well as distant recurrence rates, were actually fairly modest. There was about an 8.9% risk of any breast cancer event at 41 months, and half of those were distant recurrences. There were 44 breast cancer events, 22 of which were distant recurrences. That met the safety criteria, which were pre-specified in terms of a safety threshold, it was below the safety threshold.
We also used a historical control group that we calculated, matched from the SOFT and TEXT cohorts, the trials where women were enrolled and received either Tamoxifen or ovarian suppression plus Tamoxifen or AI. We included women in the control cohort that would've been eligible for POSITIVE and then matched them by important prognostic characteristics and treatment. When we compare them to this control cohort, the women in POSITIVE looked to do just as well as the women who did not take a temporary interruption of endocrine therapy to become pregnant.
Some results of the POSITIVE trial suggest that it's not only safe to become pregnant, at least in the short term after a breast cancer diagnosis following the POSITIVE criteria, but also, the vast majority of women actually did become pregnant. Over time, about 74% of patients did become pregnant, most within the first two years. We find these data quite reassuring and really important for our young patients who want to not only survive breast cancer, but thrive in their survivorship.
The POSITIVE trial was an international collaboration. We know that it was really hard to do, because people had to come together to help support these patients. It's not a hot new drug we were testing, it was a very altruistic move on the part of patients to be willing to participate in this, they can get pregnant on their own. The really important thing is that we're happy with the results and they'll provide really good data for patients making this important decision, but we only have 41 month follow-up. The critical feature for POSITIVE is we need long-term follow up. We want to follow these women for at least 10 years so that we can know that it's not only safe in the first few years, but it's safe in the long term. That's going to be really critical, particularly in the setting of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, where we know there is the risk of late recurrence.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Andrea De Censi, MD, PhD, of Italy’s E.O. Ospedali Galliera, discusses phase III findings showing that low-dose tamoxifen (so-called babytam) given for 3 years still significantly prevents recurrences from noninvasive breast cancer after a median of 7 years from treatment cessation. Babytam at 5 mg/d for 3 years significantly lowered recurrence from noninvasive breast cancer at 10 years without “excess” adverse events (Abstract GS4-08).
The ASCO Post Staff
Per Karlsson, MD, PhD, of Sweden’s University of Gothenburg and the Sahlgrenska Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results from the POLAR study, which was a meta-analysis of three clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy. POLAR is the first genomic classifier that appears not only to be prognostic for locoregional recurrence, but also predictive of radiotherapy benefit. Although patients with breast cancer who had a high POLAR score benefited from radiotherapy, patients with a low score did not, and may be candidates for omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (Abstract GS4-03).
The ASCO Post Staff
Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses phase II results from the TRIO-US B-12 TALENT study, which showed that patients with localized, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-low breast cancer who are treated with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) in the neoadjuvant setting had an overall response rate (ORR) of 68%. When combined with anastrozole, T-DXd led to a 58% ORR. This is the first trial to evaluate T-DXd in HER2-low breast cancer, a potentially curable disease (Abstract GS2-03).
The ASCO Post Staff
Marleen Kok, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses the most important advances in early breast cancer treatment during the past year for patients with triple-negative, HER2-positive, and estrogen receptor–positive disease. Dr. Kok also addresses long-term treatment toxicities and quality of life.
The ASCO Post Staff
Erica L. Mayer, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses findings from the PACE study of patients with endocrine- and CDK4/6 inhibitor–pretreated estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were randomly assigned to fulvestrant alone; fulvestrant and palbociclib; or fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab. Combining palbociclib with fulvestrant beyond disease progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor regimen did not improve progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone. A longer progression-free survival when a PD-L1 inhibitor was added to fulvestrant and palbociclib deserves further study. A baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis suggests that the potential benefit of palbociclib after progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor may be influenced by ESR1 or PIK3CA status (Abstract GS3-06).
