Advertisement


Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD: New Findings on How the IRF4 Gene Shapes Tumor Immunity in Follicular Lymphoma

2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Advertisement

Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD, and Patrizia Mondello, MD, PhD, both of the Mayo Clinic, discuss the 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapse early and experience a poor prognosis. The researchers found that FLs with high levels of IRF4 expression are associated with a suppressive tumor microenvironment, and selective IRF4 silencing restores antilymphoma T-cell immunity. Further investigation is warranted to identify the mechanisms by which IRF4 controls tumor immunity to develop precision therapies for this population (Abstract 70).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Stephen M.Ansell: Dr. Mondella, that was a great abstract, really appreciated what you had to say about IRF4 in follicular lymphoma. I was really interested and curious: why did you pick IRF4? What do we know about it, and why would that be important in follicular lymphoma? Patrizia Mondella: That is a fantastic question. The point here is we perform a [inaudible 00:00:27] studies that identify the A cluster with particular relevance of R four and poor prognosis and two microenvironment. The problem is there is not so much known about R four as interact with the tumor micro environment and we wanted to understand how it's possible that the B cells may reprogram the tumor micro environment. So for this reason, we assessed whether the R Four expression could be associated with the batter or a worse tumor micro environment. And we further dissect with the different bioinformatics analysis to evaluate first of all, which are the mono population more frequently associated with R four high or low expression. And we indeed define how I R four expression was associated with higher deregulatory cells, higher CD 40 cells and we also further identify the immuno phenotype that was exhausted and we then try to do some in vitro experiment and identify that if we have or we don't have R four, we can modulate costimulatory receptor of the B cells that then can be one of the counterpart that can influence the tumor microenvironment. But also the cytokines that are released from cells, they may or may not expressor report they can further influence the tumor microenvironment. Stephen M.Ansell: And you showed some really interesting information about certain receptor ligand pairs that change and that go up and down based on IRF4. Tell me a little bit more about exactly what you showed. Patrizia Mondella: Yeah, see what I was referring about costimulatory receptors is more fertilizer to the CD 40 expression that engage the IRF4 haler cells and the PDL one expression. So while left CD 40 was down regulated in R four high, the PDL one was up regulated and PDL one is more inhibitory. So we identify how R four is controlling the expression of this receptors and the indeed that can influence the tumor macro environment. Stephen M.Ansell: And this actually impacts not all of follicular lymphoma but a subset. So about how many, what percentage of follicular lymphoma is this a relevant mechanism? Patrizia Mondella: So as now we have identified something about a 20 or something more percent of the tumor analyze the problem is that we need to further expand our investigation in order to make a better statement. And the more interesting finding is that what we have identified at the bioinformatics level was also translated in [inaudible 00:03:16] chemistry level. And this isn't interesting because our IRF4 is currently not assessed in the normal panel that is used for follicular lymphoma. And we believe this should be actually add in order to evaluate the prognosis of the patients. But again, we have fundings that were done in a small subset and currently as you know, we are going to expand further these identification in order to make a better statement. Stephen M.Ansell: And clearly this is an important finding because it's an opportunity to modulate something, to change something that could in a bad prognosis group result in a better outcome. So how do you think we might be able to target, are we going to go after IRF4?, are we going to go off to CD 40? Or We going to go off to PD-l? What do you think? Patrizia Mondella: This is an excellent question. So first of all, one of the most important part is that IRF4 is not only expressing focal lymphoma, but we have to remember that is expressed in many other [inaudible 00:04:14] lymphoma. We need to think about that IR F4 is a prognostic also in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. I believe that there is a room for target therapy against IRF4 and we really need to better understand how to target IRF4 since it's a transcription factor. So probably a product drug might be the way to go. But it's also interesting because our four reactive antigen presentation, so it might be using combination with other immunotherapy components or can be also used to in combination with CART-cell therapy. So probably this is an exciting field that should be further expanded. Stephen M.Ansell: Yeah, really exciting field. So thank you. That's exceedingly interesting and again, I look forward to where this goes with the next iteration and maybe targeted therapies in the future. Patrizia Mondella: Thanks so much. Stephen M.Ansell: Thank you.

Related Videos

Multiple Myeloma

Julie Côté, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Results of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Julie Côté, MD, of CHU de Québec–Université Laval, discusses findings from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database, which showed that integrating bortezomib and lenalidomide into the autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) sequence produces a median overall survival rate ≥ 10 years in most patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These observations highlight the contribution of post-ASCT maintenance, particularly lenalidomide given until disease progression, when used in multiple patient groups including those with and without high risk, as well as those requiring a second induction regimen (Abstract 117).

Multiple Myeloma
Genomics/Genetics
Immunotherapy

Francesco Maura, MD, on Genomic Determinants of Resistance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Targeted Immunotherapy

Francesco Maura, MD, of the University of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses his team’s findings in which they defined a comprehensive catalogue of genomic determinants of response to DKRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The researchers have identified a number of new genomic alterations that explain resistance to the agents currently used in combination regimens (Abstract 470).

 

Lymphoma

Jia Ruan, MD, PhD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Phase II Findings on Acalabrutinib/Lenalidomide/Rituximab

Jia Ruan, MD, PhD, of Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, discusses trial results demonstrating that the triple chemotherapy-free combination of acalabrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab is well tolerated, highly effective, and produces high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response as an initial treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma, including those with TP53 mutations. Real-time MRD analysis may enable treatment de-escalation during maintenance to minimize toxicity, which warrants further evaluation. An expansion cohort of acalabrutinib/lenalidomide/obinutuzumab is being launched (Abstract 73).

Leukemia

Andrew Matthews, MD, on AML: Real-World Effectiveness of 7 + 3 Intensive Chemotherapy vs Venetoclax and a Hypomethylating Agent

Andrew Matthews, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, discusses findings from a large, multicenter study that showed superior outcomes with 7 + 3 chemotherapy (cytarabine continuously for 7 days, along with short infusions of an anthracycline on each of the first 3 days) vs venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this real-world data set, the 7 + 3 cohort outperformed historical benchmarks in overall survival and early mortality, perhaps reflecting improved later lines of therapy and patient selection. Prospective studies (such as NCT04801797) must confirm the superiority of intensive chemotherapy (Abstract 426).

 

Leukemia

Anand P. Jillella, MD, on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Simplified Patient Care Strategy to Decrease Early Deaths

Anand P. Jillella, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discusses results from the ECOG-ACRIN EA9131 Trial, which showed that using a simplified treatment algorithm and management recommendations made by a group of specialists, resulted in a dramatic improvement in 1-year survival of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (Abstract 421).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement