Advertisement


Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, and Ignace Vergote, MD, PhD, on Cervical Cancer: Interim Results on Tisotumab Vedotin-tftv Plus Pembrolizumab

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ignace Vergote, MD, PhD, of Belgium’s University Hospitals Leuven, discuss interim safety and efficacy results from a third dose-expansion cohort evaluating first-line tisotumab vedotin-tftv plus pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Data on the combination showed durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile (Abstract 5507).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Ursula Matulonis: Ignace, it's great to see you. Congratulations on this abstract. I think it's one of the exciting abstracts of ASCO 2022, and thank you for presenting the results. So, tell us about this trial and about tisotumab vedotin and its mechanism of action. Ignace Vergote: Thank you for your compliment. The tisotumab vedotin is an antibody drug conjugate binding to tissue factor. Tissue factor is present in many tumors, but especially in cervical cancer. Almost always it's present. And like all antibody drug conjugates, it binds to tissue factor and then the active chemotherapy is monomethyl or Restatin-E, which is a chemotherapy which is used often in ADCs. Once it's incorporated in the cell, the antibody and the drug splits and cell death is the result, which also results in activation of the T-cells, which are promoted due to the apoptosis. This is also the reason why a combination with PD-L1 blockers is very interesting because, of course, in this way we get even a stronger immunological effect in addition to the chemotherapeutic effect. Ursula Matulonis: So, tell us about the three arms that you presented, and also the really exciting results that you presented that's come out of those arms. Ignace Vergote: Yeah. So the three arms which we have presented here is two in first line, recurrent cervical cancer, or advanced cervical cancer, stage four, usually. One cohort with tisotumab vedotin and carboplatin and one cohort with tisotumab vedotin and pembro. And the other is second line or third line. It's about three, three quarter second line, and the rest third line with tisotumab vedotin and pembrolizumab again. Ursula Matulonis: And tell us about, the results are quite striking in terms of the overall response rates. Ignace Vergote: Yes. In first line with tisotumab vedotin and carboplatin, we have a response rate of 55%, which is good. That's without pembro, without the bevacizumab. Like, when we compare to keynote A26, we have to take into account it's only two drugs. And very similar for, tisotumab vedotin and pembro and first line 41% response. And what is very interesting is that the response in the two cohorts with pembro is very long. We have follow-up of one and a half year almost. And the medium duration of response in the TV pembro is not even reached. And that's of course, something which we know with IOs. Also with siniprimot and second line. The responses, if there are responses, is very long. That a combination of the tisotumab vedotin and pembro, you see a higher response rate and a long response rate. More than one year. Ursula Matulonis: And I think most of the patients on the Pembro arm were PD-L1 positive? Ignace Vergote: Yes. That was about, depending on the cohort, between 85% and 91%. So, there were PD-L1 positive. We didn't select it for them, but we know that in cervical cancer about 90% is PD-L1 positive. So, that's concordant. Ursula Matulonis: It's very, it's very impressive results. So, tell us a little bit about the toxicities of tizonumab and then if you saw any unusual toxicities, when, when putting this drug together with either carboplatin or with, with pembro. Ignace Vergote: Well, I've been involved in tisotumab vedotin now for six, seven years already. I did the first in humans. The phase one I presented at ESMO, I think in 2017. The monotherapy, and then the consolidation trial, which led to the fast track approval of the monotherapy in second line. And in the beginning, the eye toxicity was more of a problem, especially when we gave tisotumab vedotin weekly. There was also cohort, but we learned how to treat this eye toxicity and how to prevent it with eye drops, with cooling pads on the eyes during the infusion. And so in this study, we have, I think, depending on the cohort, but we have about 3% grade three eye toxicity, but the main toxicities are grade one and two and quite quickly reversible now with these precautions. So, for the peripheral neuropathy, indeed, we see this as well. But, as you know we all have a lot of experience with paclitaxel and when I compare it, it's less and later. It's especially patients who are treated very long. We have been treating patients up to one year with tisotumab vedotin, and then you see it. Sometimes earlier, but it's mainly a late effect. And little bit different characteristics compared with what we know from paclitaxel. Ursula Matulonis: Next steps for tisotumab and cervical cancer? Ignace Vergote: Well, we are doing with GOG foundation, the ENGOT Cervix 12, which is a trial in second line with monotherapy and randomized phase three, which is running very well compared with the classical chemotherapies. So this is one thing. And then the other thing, of course, with these results, which we have presented here, we are doing a new cohort with the, with the triplet and the quadruplet. We have also presented that as a tip here, meaning tisotumab vedotin, carboplatin, pembro, and Bev. Or the triplets, if Bev is contraindicated. So, and this is of course the preparation of a first line trial as well. Ursula Matulonis: Congratulations. That makes perfect sense. It's it's a really active drug and thank you for your really significant role in, in starting the trials and getting to this time point for a cancer that really hasn't had much in terms of movement forward in terms of new treatments. And advances. So, so thank you so much. Ignace Vergote: Thank you.

Related Videos

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, on Prostate Cancer: New Data on Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) vs Cabazitaxel

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, discuss follow-up results on LuPSMA vs cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment. The findings suggest that LuPSMA is a suitable option for this population, with fewer adverse events, higher response rates, improved patient-reported outcomes, and similar overall survival compared with cabazitaxel (Abstract 5000).

Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: New Data on Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone, With or Without ASCT

Paul G. Richardson, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings from the DETERMINATION trial, which showed that, for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) with or without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and lenalidomide maintenance to disease progression resulted in the longest median progression-free survival reported for each approach, and a highly significant difference in progression-free survival in favor of early transplant. While overall response rates were similar, rates of MRD favored early transplant also, but toxicity was greater and quality of life was transiently but significantly diminished. No overall survival advantage has been observed to date (Abstract LBA4).

Lymphoma

Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, and Michael L. Wang, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: New Data on Ibrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine/Rituximab and Rituximab Maintenance

Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Michael L. Wang, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss primary results from the phase III SHINE study, which showed that ibrutinib, in combination with bendamustine/rituximab and rituximab maintenance, may set a new benchmark for patients aged 65 or older with mantle cell lymphoma. With a median progression-free survival of 6.7 years, the ibrutinib combination is more beneficial than currently used chemoimmunotherapy (approximately 1.5–3.5 years) (Abstract LBA7502).

Lung Cancer
Immunotherapy

Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr, MD, MBA, and Oladimeji Akinboro, MD, MPH, on NSCLC: Outcomes of Anti–PD-(L)1 Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in the First-Line Setting

Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr, MD, MBA, of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami, and Oladimeji Akinboro, MD, MPH, of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), discuss a data analysis, which suggests that most subgroups of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer with a PD-L1 score of 50% or greater who are receiving FDA-approved chemotherapy/immunotherapy regimens may have overall survival outcomes comparable to or better than immunotherapy-alone regimens (Abstract 9000).

Pancreatic Cancer

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, on Pancreatic Cancer: Nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, and FOLFOX for Metastatic Disease

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, of Alcala de Henares University in Spain, discusses phase II results from the SEQUENCE trial, which showed that nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and modified FOLFOX showed significantly higher clinical activity than the standard nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the first-line setting of patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Abstract 4022).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement