Stephanie Walker on Increasing the Participation of Black Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer in Clinical Trials
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
Stephanie Walker, a former nurse and current activist with the Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance, discusses findings from the BECOME project (Black Experience of Clinical Trials and Opportunities for Meaningful Engagement). They show that, even though Black patients comprise between 4% and 6% of all clinical trial participants, Black women with metastatic breast cancer are willing to consider taking part if steps were taken to increase their awareness, build trust through clear communication with health-care providers, involve people of shared racial/ethnic identity and health experience, and help patients find and access trials (Abstract 1014).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
My project for ASCO this year was to include or increase participation of black men and women with metastatic breast cancer in clinical trials. First of all, I think we need to inform. We not only need to inform the patients about clinical trials, but we also need to inform you as a healthcare provider to ask us. Because the majority of the patients that were asked on this survey, if they knew about clinical trials, they didn't know. I think it is part of the job of the healthcare provider to ask us. Don't assume that we don't know about it, or we know about it and choose not to. Don't assume that we can't afford it. Don't assume that we're not educated enough to do this. Everybody needs to be informed. Next, we need to inspire. You need to inspire us as the patient. You need to help build that bond regarding trust and the healthcare provider, which is you. We need to inspire trust, even though we know the trials and tribulations in the past, we need to go forward. You need to ensure that we know where we can get in touch with people regarding the clinical trials. We also need to ensure that we know how to utilize the resources, to look for clinical trials or where to find those. Also, you need to address the barriers. Financial is the biggest barrier that we have. You need to help us by providing a meal because a clinical trial is all day. Or parking. We have childcare that we need to attend to. Help address some of those little barriers. They may seem little to you, but they are huge barriers for us. If you take care of the barriers, ensure that we know where to contact or where to enroll in clinical trials, inspire, develop the trust, and we need to inform the patient and yourself about including and talking to us about clinical trials. With that being said, we are going to do a follow-up study to reach those that we were unable to reach, which were those people in rural communities that are not connected to internet or not connected to a university-based institution, because 80% of all the cancer patients are treated in community-based cancer centers. I encourage you to look at other methods of including us in clinical trials. Instead of having me fly from the east coast to the west coast, to do a clinical trial or fly from the east coast to the west coast, to get CT scans when I can get them five minutes down the road. I need you to address some of those logistics, some of the barriers regarding finances. I also need you to know us. Get to know your patients in that 15 minutes, I know is a short period of time that you have to spend with us in the office, but you also need to inform us. Do not assume. Inform us of clinical trials.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Clifford A. Hudis, MD, of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Karen E. Knudsen, PhD, MBA, of the American Cancer Society, discuss their collaboration, pooling their research and education resources to help empower patients with cancer and their families. Within 48 hours, Drs. Hudis and Knudsen were able to gear up a rapid response to the crisis in Ukraine, forming a clinical corps of volunteers to post information online in multiple languages, which helped patients navigate their care in the war-torn region. To date, 300 European cancer organizations have joined their efforts.
The ASCO Post Staff
Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-716 study. The trial showed that compared with placebo, adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved distant metastasis–free survival in patients with resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma. The findings also suggest a continued reduction in the risk of recurrence and a favorable benefit-risk profile (Abstract LBA9500).
The ASCO Post Staff
Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, of Italy’s Gemelli University Hospital, discuss phase III data from the MITO23 trial on single-agent trabectedin vs clinician’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers of BRCA-mutated or BRCAness phenotype. Although trabectedin has demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed platinum-sensitive disease, it does not appear to improve survival outcomes when compared with standard chemotherapy in the BRCA-mutated population (Abstract LBA5504).
Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Hope S. Rugo, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, discuss phase III results from the TROPiCS-02 trial. This study showed that sacituzumab govitecan-hziy was more beneficial than single-agent chemotherapy in terms of progression-free survival in heavily pretreated patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative and unresectable advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).
The ASCO Post Staff
Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, discuss follow-up results on LuPSMA vs cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment. The findings suggest that LuPSMA is a suitable option for this population, with fewer adverse events, higher response rates, improved patient-reported outcomes, and similar overall survival compared with cabazitaxel (Abstract 5000).