Advertisement


Sumanta Pal, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: CRISPR-Engineered CAR T Cells in Advanced Disease

SITC 2022

Advertisement

Sumanta Pal, MD, of the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses phase I results from the COBALT-RCC study, a first-in-human clinical trial exploring CD70 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The agent appeared to show an excellent safety profile with no unexpected toxicities and antitumor activity. One durable complete response is the first to be achieved with allogeneic CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, offering proof of concept for further exploration of CD70-targeted CAR T cells in renal cell and other CD70-positive malignancies (Abstract 558).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Renal cell carcinoma, we have an exciting array of available therapies, including VEGF inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors. The challenge for us though is that it's a small fraction of patients that are actually cured of their disease. With that in mind, it's really critical that we look to new treatments and new pathways, and actually cell therapy represents one of those potential avenues. We usually think about cell therapies in the context of liquid tumors, for instance, myeloma and lymphoma, but the COBALT-RCC study sought out to test whether or not CTX130, which is an allogeneic CD70 directed CAR-T cell, could potentially have an impact in this disease. CD70 is a target that's very pervasively expressed in renal cell carcinoma. It's also expressed in some cutaneous T-cell lymphomas as well. So the COBALT-RCC study included patients who had actually received one prior VEGF inhibitor, one prior PD1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, and thereafter, they were allowed to potentially participate in the trial. Patients in this study were actually quite heavily pretreated. Patients received CTX 130. As I'd mentioned, it's an allogeneic CAR-T cell directed at CD70 with a couple of key edits. We actually removed CD70 from the cell to prevent fratricide, the T-cell receptors removed and MHC1 is removed as well. There's also a locus, of course, that's anti-CD70. In the study, patients were allowed to receive lymphative bleeding chemotherapy with Fludarabine and Cytoxan. They thereafter received CTX130 as a onetime infusion. Patients were allowed to re-dose, and ultimately, we enrolled a total of 14 patients that we presented [inaudible 00:01:49]. I was really impressed with the fact the toxicities we experienced were very limited. About half of patients had grade one to two CRS, but we didn't have any grade three CRS events. There was no ICANS or graft versus host disease. And one thing that is incredibly, incredibly exciting, and this I think is really going to hopefully bring a lot of attention to this type of therapy in the field, is that we had a patient who actually achieved a complete response. Not only that, but this complete response has actually been durable. The complete response has lasted now for a total of two years. There's an array of other patients in the study who achieve stable disease as a best response. And again, I think we're looking forward to developing this therapy in the future as a later version, CTX131, with some additional edits that we think are going to enhance activity and also enhance efficacy. With that, I think the future is bright for cell therapies and renal cell carcinoma.

Related Videos

Immunotherapy

Michael A. Postow, MD, on Using the Novel Radiotracer Crefmirlimab Berdoxam for Imaging to Assess Immunotherapy Responsiveness

Michael A. Postow, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses new findings on the correlation between CD8 cell PET imaging with zirconium-89–crefmirlimab berdoxam and CD8 cell immunohistochemistry in patients with advanced cancer receiving immunotherapy. Noninvasive CD8 PET scanning with crefmirlimab berdoxam permits whole-patient, longitudinal CD8 assessment, which is currently under investigation as a biomarker for immunotherapy responsiveness and may be a useful tool for immunotherapy development and clinical management (Abstract 1472).

Immunotherapy

Michael B. Atkins, MD, on Reconciling Differences in Phase II and III Immuno-oncology Trial Data

Michael B. Atkins, MD, of Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, explores recent clinical trials in immuno-oncology in which the phase III trial produced markedly different results from the phase II trial. To help understand the potential value to patients of late-stage trials of treatment combinations, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer has developed a checklist for investigators, applicable to any regimen in which immune modulation is an important component of the antitumor effect.

CNS Cancers
Immunotherapy

David Reardon, MD, on Glioblastoma: A Microbiome-Based Vaccine, Nivolumab, and Bevacizumab

David Reardon, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase I/II results from the EOGBM1-18/ROSALIE study, which showed the EO2401 vaccine plus nivolumab generated systemic immune responses correlating with efficacy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Adding bevacizumab to this combination appeared to improve efficacy. (Abstract 642).

Solid Tumors
Immunotherapy

Antoni Ribas, MD, PhD, on Solid Tumors: Safety and Efficacy of TCR T-Cell Therapy

Antoni Ribas, MD, PhD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, discusses a phase I study that used CRISPR gene editing to simultaneously “knock out” endogenous T-cell receptors and replace them with personalized neoantigen T-cell receptors in patients with solid tumors. The edited TCR T-cell products were safely infused and trafficked to the tumor lesions (Abstract 1478).

Immunotherapy
Lung Cancer

Talal El Zarif, MD, and Abdul Rafeh Naqash, MD: For Patients Living With HIV and Cancer, New Data on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Talal El Zarif, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Abdul Rafeh Naqash, MD, of Stephenson Cancer Center at The University of Oklahoma, discuss the results of their cohort study of patients living with HIV and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer, who are often underrepresented in clinical trials, and the safety and efficacy of treating this unique population with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The data showed that patients living with HIV and lung cancer had similar toxicity profiles and clinical outcomes as did those who did not have HIV and received ICIs (Abstract 437).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement