Karriem S. Watson, DHSc, on Early Engagement in Clinical Trials for Underrepresented Communities
AACR Annual Meeting 2023
Karriem S. Watson, DHSc, MPH, of the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program, discusses the importance of engaging in clinical trials for those who are underrepresented in biomedical research. Community engagement is a proven and effective tool, Dr. Watson says, to enhance participation in research by increasing access to and awareness of medical studies and has already been shown to expand the reach of therapies, improving cancer outcomes. (Abstract PL03-05)
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
It is been my pleasure to discuss the importance of diversity in clinical trials. As a cancer disparities researcher and as well as Chief Engagement Officer for the NIH All of Us Research Program, I've seen firsthand what intentional community engagement can do to improve cancer outcomes. I've seen the impact of community-based participatory research as an evidence-based tool to support reaching populations that have been historically underrepresented in biomedical research. We think about populations that carry some of the greatest burden of cancer, such as African-American men. In my research, I've been able to engage African-American men as citizen scientists by working with barbershops, by working with faith leaders as well as members of fraternities and other civic organizations to ensure that we engage members from the community, members that carry the same burden of disease that we see in the populations, that we want to do outreach to engage those partners as equal participants and equal partners in our work.
And it's been through trusted relationship building that we've been able to address and mitigate some of the historical misgivings that have happened, such as when you think about things and studies like those that happened to Henrietta Lacks, when you think about the United States Public Health Service study of syphilis in Tuskegee, Alabama, you think about the historical medical mistrust that has happened. As a result of some of that historical medical mistrust it's important for us to build honest and transparent relationships with people. And through the NIH All of Us Research Program , it's been through these trusted relationships through an engagement ecosystem of over 135 national and local partners that we've been able to build partnerships to address trust, to address transparency, to address things like how do we return value in research, and it's through those trusted partners that we'll be able to advance health disparities research.
Additionally, in my work, I've also looked at some of the ways that we can culturally tailor our educational tools. When you think about a lot of the resources that we have to address cancer disparities, a lot of those resources were not made by, for, nor with populations that carry the greatest burden of disease. In my work, I've found that including the community in both the design, the implementation, as well as dissemination of the research will improve the reach as well as help us to get to mitigating many of those cancer disparities. In the All of Us research program, we've seen firsthand that including community members as partners through intentional community engagement can actually increase the representation of diverse populations in research. We actually have unprecedented numbers of diversity equity inclusion with over 46% of our participants who self-identify as racial and ethnic minorities. And over 80% of our participants are from an underrepresented group in biomedical research. All that has been achieved through direct community engagement.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Christina M. Dieli-Conwright, PhD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses her research on the ways in which postdiagnosis exercise, particularly resistance exercise, can build strength and muscle mass and affect cancer outcomes. She also describes her focus on biomarkers related to body composition, inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and cognition—all influenced by exercise.
The ASCO Post Staff
Dario A. Vignali, PhD, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, discusses LAG3, the third inhibitory receptor to be used in the clinic. He describes the signaling mechanism this immunotherapy uses; new insight into its function, alone and in combination with PD-1; and an analysis of samples from patients treated with LAG3/PD-1 therapeutics. (Abstract PL04-05)
The ASCO Post Staff
John V. Heymach, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III results from the AEGEAN trial, which showed that patients with treatment-naive, resectable, non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received neoadjuvant durvalumab plus chemotherapy and adjuvant durvalumab monotherapy had improved event-free survival and pathologic complete response, compared with those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. (Abstract CT005)
The ASCO Post Staff
Pierce K.H. Chow, PhD, MBBS, of the National Cancer Centre, Singapore and Duke-NUS Medical School, discusses phase III findings showing that, for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of disease recurrence, adjuvant therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after resection or thermal ablation was more effective than active surveillance. According to Dr. Chow, these results could lead to reassessment of surgical resection in this disease. (Abstract CT003)
The ASCO Post Staff
R. Katie Kelley, MD, of the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, San Francisco, discusses phase III findings of the KEYNOTE-966 study, which showed that adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin improved overall survival in patients with untreated metastatic or unresectable biliary tract cancer. (Abstract CT008)