Advertisement


Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, on Patient-Reported Outcomes From EMBER-3

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, of Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, University of Milano, discusses patient-reported outcomes from the phase III EMBER-3 trial, which investigated treatment with imlunestrant, investigator’s choice of standard endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant plus abemaciclib in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1001).  



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The EMBER-3 was a prospective randomized trial comparing a standard of care that is endocrine therapy versus imlunestrant and imlunestrant alone versus imlunestrant plus abemaciclib. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival and according to the data that will be presented, imlunestrant alone was better than standard of care endocrine therapy in the patient population with ESR1 mutation. The secondary endpoint of the study was to compare imlunestrant to imlunestrant plus abemaciclib and the addition of abemaciclib improved median progression-free survival versus imlunestrant. What we are going to present during ASCO is the secondary endpoint: patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. We assessed global health status and quality of life in patients receiving imlunestrant alone, endocrine therapy standard of care, and imlunestrant plus abemaciclib. According to the results of the study, the quality of life and the global health status of the patient population receiving abemaciclib plus imlunestrant was exactly very similar to the standard arm imlunestrant alone. Also, when we compare imlunestrant to standard of care, we have a similar quality of life and similar patient-reported outcome. Maybe the most interesting finding of the study was the injection site reaction, because the patients in the standard of care arm received fulvestrant and many of the patients in the patient-reported outcome complained about injection site reaction. We have also to report the data on diarrhea that was more frequent in the arm imlunestrant plus abemaciclib versus imlunestrant alone even if data are almost similar to the standard of care actually the fulvestrant plus abemaciclib. So in conclusion, the data on patient-reported outcome from EMBER-3 confirm that quality of life and global health status was not so different with respect to standard of care. We have also to report that injection site reaction derived from fulvestrant administration was a major issue for almost all patients. So we confirm that imlunestrant alone is better than standard of care in ESR1-mutant population, and that the combination of imlunestrant plus abemaciclib is a new standard of care in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease without affecting global health status and quality of life.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Erika Hamilton, MD, on ER-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Vepdegestrant vs Fulvestrant

Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000). 

Ruben A. Mesa, MD, on Essential Thrombocythemia: SURPASS-ET Trial

Ruben A. Mesa, MD, of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, presents results from a phase III trial investigating the efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b vs anagrelide for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (Abstract 6500). 

 

Lung Cancer

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, on NSCLC Treatment Planning: Role of 14-Gene Molecular Assay

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, Chief Scientific Officer of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data on the role of a 14-gene molecular assay in selecting patients with stage IA–IIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as high risk (LBA8027). 

Breast Cancer

Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, and Rebecca Alexandra Dent, MD, FASCO, on Breast Cancer Data Highlights: Sequencing of Endocrine Therapy

Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO, of City of Hope, and Rebecca Alexandra Dent, MD, FASCO, of National Cancer Centre Singapore, review the results of a biomarker analysis of the DESTINY-Breast06 trial, which evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan after endocrine therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 1013). They also discuss findings from the SERENA-6 and EMBER-3 trials, also presented at ASCO 2025, and what all this new data means for the sequencing of endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. 

Colorectal Cancer

Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, on MSI-H/dMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expanded Analyses From CheckMate 8HW

Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, reviews analyses from the CheckMate 8HW trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy for microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (Abstract 3501). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement