Advertisement


Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, on PD-L1–Positive Advanced TNBC: First-Line Doublet Comparison

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses findings from the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study, which compared sacituzumab govitecan-hziy plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (LBA109). 

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year, we presented results from the ASCENT-04 trial. This is a randomized phase three study of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We know that about 15% of all breast cancers are triple-negative, and about 40% of triple-negative breast cancers are PD-L1–positive. Currently, these patients are treated with chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition, where we've seen median progression-free survival that ranges between 7 to 9 months. We also have antibody-drug conjugates to treat pretreated metastatic triple-negative disease, and sacituzumab govitecan is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate that has previously been found to improve both progression-free and overall survival in pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and is currently a second-line standard-of-care option. There has been a lot of interest in combining antibody-drug conjugates with checkpoint inhibitors given some robust preclinical and clinical data. And so ASCENT-04 was really designed to test the efficacy of sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab. This trial was designed in patients who had no prior systemic therapy in the metastatic triple-negative setting. They had to either have de novo metastatic disease or be at least six months out from completion of any systemic therapy in the early disease setting. Prior use of checkpoint inhibition for early-stage breast cancer was allowed, and patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. A physician’s choice plus pembrolizumab or choice of chemotherapy could either be paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or carboplatin and gemcitabine. For those patients on the chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab arm, if they progressed, they were allowed to get crossover treatment with sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy if they had centrally confirmed disease progression during the crossover phase of the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review, and the primary endpoint progression-free survival data demonstrated that sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab led to significant improvement in progression-free survival when compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab, with an improvement in PFS going from 7.8 to 11.2 months with a hazard ratio of 0.65 and an absolute difference of about 3.4 months. Seeing these data with an improvement in PFS suggests that the combination of sacituzumab and pembrolizumab could represent a new standard-of-care option for patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, on Extensive-Stage SCLC: Comparison of First-Line Regimens

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Unit, Universidad Complutense and Ciberonc, discusses data from the TIGOS trial, a phase III study comparing the first-line use of atigotatug (an antifucosyl-GM1 monoclonal antibody) plus nivolumab fixed-dose combination with chemotherapy vs atezolizumab with chemotherapy in patients with  extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Abstract TPS8127).

 

Ruben A. Mesa, MD, on Essential Thrombocythemia: SURPASS-ET Trial

Ruben A. Mesa, MD, of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, presents results from a phase III trial investigating the efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b vs anagrelide for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (Abstract 6500). 

 

Colorectal Cancer

Christopher M. Booth, MD, on a Structured Exercise Program for Patients With Colon Cancer

Christopher M. Booth, MD, of Queen’s University, reviews findings from the randomized phase III Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) CO.21 (CHALLENGE) trial, which evaluated the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival in patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (Abstract LBA3510). 

Breast Cancer

Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, on Patient-Reported Outcomes From EMBER-3

Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, of Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, University of Milano, discusses patient-reported outcomes from the phase III EMBER-3 trial, which investigated treatment with imlunestrant, investigator’s choice of standard endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant plus abemaciclib in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1001).  

Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, on INAVO120: Final Overall Survival Analysis

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, presents final overall survival data from the INAVO120 trial of inavolisib/placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative, endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1003).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement