Advertisement


Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, on PD-L1–Positive Advanced TNBC: First-Line Doublet Comparison

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses findings from the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study, which compared sacituzumab govitecan-hziy plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (LBA109). 

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year, we presented results from the ASCENT-04 trial. This is a randomized phase three study of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We know that about 15% of all breast cancers are triple-negative, and about 40% of triple-negative breast cancers are PD-L1–positive. Currently, these patients are treated with chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition, where we've seen median progression-free survival that ranges between 7 to 9 months. We also have antibody-drug conjugates to treat pretreated metastatic triple-negative disease, and sacituzumab govitecan is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate that has previously been found to improve both progression-free and overall survival in pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and is currently a second-line standard-of-care option. There has been a lot of interest in combining antibody-drug conjugates with checkpoint inhibitors given some robust preclinical and clinical data. And so ASCENT-04 was really designed to test the efficacy of sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab. This trial was designed in patients who had no prior systemic therapy in the metastatic triple-negative setting. They had to either have de novo metastatic disease or be at least six months out from completion of any systemic therapy in the early disease setting. Prior use of checkpoint inhibition for early-stage breast cancer was allowed, and patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. A physician’s choice plus pembrolizumab or choice of chemotherapy could either be paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or carboplatin and gemcitabine. For those patients on the chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab arm, if they progressed, they were allowed to get crossover treatment with sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy if they had centrally confirmed disease progression during the crossover phase of the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review, and the primary endpoint progression-free survival data demonstrated that sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab led to significant improvement in progression-free survival when compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab, with an improvement in PFS going from 7.8 to 11.2 months with a hazard ratio of 0.65 and an absolute difference of about 3.4 months. Seeing these data with an improvement in PFS suggests that the combination of sacituzumab and pembrolizumab could represent a new standard-of-care option for patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Elena Elez, MD, PhD, on Updated Survival Data From the BREAKWATER Trial

Elena Elez, MD, PhD, of Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, presents updated overall survival data as well as progression-free survival data from the BREAKWATER trial of the first-line use of encorafenib, cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (LBA3500). 

Prostate Cancer

Eric Huttenlocher Bent, MD, PhD, on Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Intensified Hormonal Blockade

Eric Huttenlocher Bent, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, reviews results from the phase II Metacure trial (cohorts B2 and the B2 expansion), which looked at the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for PSMA-PETdetected oligometastatic prostate adenocarcinoma (Abstract 5014). 

Lung Cancer

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, on NSCLC Treatment Planning: Role of 14-Gene Molecular Assay

David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, Chief Scientific Officer of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data on the role of a 14-gene molecular assay in selecting patients with stage IA–IIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as high risk (LBA8027). 

Lung Cancer

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, on Extensive-Stage SCLC: Comparison of First-Line Regimens

Luis G. Paz-Ares, MD, PhD, of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Unit, Universidad Complutense and Ciberonc, discusses data from the TIGOS trial, a phase III study comparing the first-line use of atigotatug (an antifucosyl-GM1 monoclonal antibody) plus nivolumab fixed-dose combination with chemotherapy vs atezolizumab with chemotherapy in patients with  extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Abstract TPS8127).

 

Leukemia

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Relapsed/Refractory CLL: TRANSCEND CLL 004 

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses two abstracts on lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In Abstract 7037, liso-cel with ibrutinib demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared with liso-cel monotherapy, with statistically significant differences for complete response rate and overall response rate. In Abstract 7039, patients with R/R CLL/SLL who had received two or more prior lines of therapy had improved response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival with liso-cel compared with a real-world cohort treated with standard-of-care therapy. 

 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement