Advertisement


Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, on PD-L1–Positive Advanced TNBC: First-Line Doublet Comparison

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, FASCO, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discusses findings from the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study, which compared sacituzumab govitecan-hziy plus pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with PD-L1–positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (LBA109). 

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
At ASCO this year, we presented results from the ASCENT-04 trial. This is a randomized phase three study of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We know that about 15% of all breast cancers are triple-negative, and about 40% of triple-negative breast cancers are PD-L1–positive. Currently, these patients are treated with chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition, where we've seen median progression-free survival that ranges between 7 to 9 months. We also have antibody-drug conjugates to treat pretreated metastatic triple-negative disease, and sacituzumab govitecan is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate that has previously been found to improve both progression-free and overall survival in pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and is currently a second-line standard-of-care option. There has been a lot of interest in combining antibody-drug conjugates with checkpoint inhibitors given some robust preclinical and clinical data. And so ASCENT-04 was really designed to test the efficacy of sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab. This trial was designed in patients who had no prior systemic therapy in the metastatic triple-negative setting. They had to either have de novo metastatic disease or be at least six months out from completion of any systemic therapy in the early disease setting. Prior use of checkpoint inhibition for early-stage breast cancer was allowed, and patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. A physician’s choice plus pembrolizumab or choice of chemotherapy could either be paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or carboplatin and gemcitabine. For those patients on the chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab arm, if they progressed, they were allowed to get crossover treatment with sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy if they had centrally confirmed disease progression during the crossover phase of the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review, and the primary endpoint progression-free survival data demonstrated that sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab led to significant improvement in progression-free survival when compared to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab, with an improvement in PFS going from 7.8 to 11.2 months with a hazard ratio of 0.65 and an absolute difference of about 3.4 months. Seeing these data with an improvement in PFS suggests that the combination of sacituzumab and pembrolizumab could represent a new standard-of-care option for patients who have previously untreated PD-L1–positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Related Videos

Head and Neck Cancer

Stuart J. Wong, MD, on Adjuvant Regimen in Resected HNSCC

Stuart J. Wong, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin and Plenary discussant, reviews findings from the phase III NIVOPOSTOP randomized trial, which investigated the adjuvant use of nivolumab added to radiochemotherapy for patients with resected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who are at high risk of relapse (LBA2). 

Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, on INAVO120: Final Overall Survival Analysis

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, presents final overall survival data from the INAVO120 trial of inavolisib/placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative, endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1003).

Breast Cancer

Erika Hamilton, MD, on ER-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Vepdegestrant vs Fulvestrant

Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000). 

Shahzad Raza, MD, on Relapsed or Refractory AL Amyloidosis: First U.S. Trial of CAR T-Cell Therapy

Shahzad Raza, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, reviews safety and efficacy data from Nexicart-2, the first U.S.-based trial of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy—an agent known as Nxc-201—in patients with relapsed or refractory light chain (AL) amyloidosis (Abstract 7508). 

Lung Cancer

Martin Reck, MD, PhD, on Postsurgical MRD, Genomic Mutations, and Outcomes in Resectable NSCLC: AEGEAN Trial

Martin Reck, MD, PhD, of LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Germany, discusses data from the phase III AEGEAN trial that studied perioperative durvalumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who were MRD-positive after surgery had significantly worse disease-free survival compared to MRD-negative patients. In addition, mutations in KEAP1 and KMT2C were associated with MRD positivity and reduced benefit from the regimen, identifying a small high-risk subgroup with poor prognosis (Abstract 8009). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement