Frank A. Sinicrope, MD, on Adjuvant Treatment Strategies for Stage III dMMR Colon Cancer
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Frank A. Sinicrope, MD, of Mayo Clinic Rochester, reviews findings from the randomized Alliance A021502/ATOMIC trial, which studied standard chemotherapy alone or combined with atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III DNA mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) colon cancer (LBA1).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
ATOMIC was for patients with deficient mismatch repair stage 3 colon cancer. All of these patients had undergone a surgical resection with curative intent and all were found to have deficient mismatch repair tumors by immunohistochemistry. Patients were randomized 1 to 1 to FOLFOX chemotherapy plus atezolizumab given for six months, with the atezolizumab continued for an additional six months. This was compared to FOLFOX alone for six months. Atezolizumab, as we know, is an anti–PD-L1 antibody. The objective of this study was to see whether or not the immunotherapy would improve outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. At the second interim analysis of this trial, with 75% of events, the trial was stopped. The results were reported out at a median follow-up of 37.2 months. The chemoimmunotherapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.5, indicating that there was a reduction in recurrence or death by 50% compared to the FOLFOX arm. So these are impressive results we regard as practice-changing, and I would comment that the treatments were well tolerated and not associated with really any adverse events that would not be expected with each of the agents. So we regard this treatment as a new standard of care for this patient population, and it really demonstrates that taking immunotherapy that we're commonly using in this population in the metastatic setting now can be moved to earlier-stage or stage 3 disease to benefit these patients also. So we think this is a very clinically meaningful result for patients, and we're very excited to continue to see if the guidelines will now be adopting this new regimen for our patients.
The ASCO Post Staff
Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000).
The ASCO Post Staff
David Allen Barbie, MD, of the Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, reviews specific clinical and molecular features of early progressors and long-term progression-free survivors from the phase III ADRIATIC trial, which assessed consolidation durvalumab vs placebo after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (Abstract 8014).
The ASCO Post Staff
Constantine Si Lun Tam, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, of Alfred Hospital and Monash University, reviews results from the 5-year follow-up of arm C of the SEQUOIA trial of treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Abstract 7011).
The ASCO Post Staff
Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, presents final overall survival data from the INAVO120 trial of inavolisib/placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative, endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1003).
The ASCO Post Staff
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses two abstracts on lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In Abstract 7037, liso-cel with ibrutinib demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared with liso-cel monotherapy, with statistically significant differences for complete response rate and overall response rate. In Abstract 7039, patients with R/R CLL/SLL who had received two or more prior lines of therapy had improved response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival with liso-cel compared with a real-world cohort treated with standard-of-care therapy.