Asaf Maoz, MD, on Pancreatic Surveillance Eligibility Criteria
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Asaf Maoz, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham/Harvard Medical School, discusses the sensitivity of age and family history criteria for determining eligibility for pancreatic cancer surveillance among individuals with a hereditary risk for the malignancy (Abstract 10500).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Our study looked at pancreatic cancer surveillance eligibility criteria among individuals who have a genetic risk of pancreatic cancer. Individuals who carry a pathogenic germline variant in a pancreatic cancer predisposition gene have an elevated risk of pancreatic cancer over the lifetime, and when surveillance has been done for these individuals, we have seen that this results in an earlier stage at diagnosis and improved survival compared with historical cohorts. However, not everyone who carries a pathogenic germline variant that predisposes them to pancreatic cancer has been eligible for pancreatic cancer surveillance and eligibility criteria have restricted eligibility based on age and a family history of pancreatic cancer. Our study was meant to look at the proportion of pathogenic germline variant carriers who would have been eligible for pancreatic cancer surveillance at the time of their pancreatic cancer diagnosis, and we leveraged a laboratory cohort to look at this question. We had over 11,000 individuals in the cohort and over 900 individuals who had a pathogenic germline variant that predisposes them to pancreatic cancer. Our results show that the age criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance eligibility did very well, with over 85% of individuals who had a pathogenic germline variant and developed pancreatic cancer meeting the age eligibility criteria for surveillance. However, the family history criteria did poorly with only 22% of individuals who carry pathogenic germline variants and developing pancreatic cancer meeting the family history criteria when it's applicable. Our results suggest that having a family history of pancreatic cancer needs to be reevaluated as an eligibility criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance among those who have a genetic risk of pancreatic cancer. We feel that our results support the recent removal of the family history requirement for pancreatic cancer surveillance eligibility for those who have germline pathogenic variants in BRCA2 and ATM.
The ASCO Post Staff
Raffaele Califano, MD, of the Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, discusses outcomes by osimertinib resistance mechanisms in MARIPOSA-2, a study that evaluated the efficacy of the bispecific antibody amivantamab-vmjw plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib (Abstract 8639).
The ASCO Post Staff
Erika Hamilton, MD, Director, Breast Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data from the global, randomized, phase III VERITAC-2 study, which compared vepdegestrant, an oral PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) estrogen receptor degrader, to fulvestrant among patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vepdegestrant is the first PROTAC to be evaluated in a phase III trial (Abstract LBA1000).
The ASCO Post Staff
Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of the Royal Marsden Hospital, presents final overall survival data from the INAVO120 trial of inavolisib/placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR-positive, HER2-negative, endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1003).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jamie E. Chaft, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, reviews results of the NeoADAURA trial, which looked at neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract 8001).
The ASCO Post Staff
Mazyar Shadman, MD, PhD, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and the University of Washington, presents results from arm D of the SEQUOIA trial, which evaluated the combination of zanubrutinib and venetoclax in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Abstract 7009).