Asaf Maoz, MD, on Pancreatic Surveillance Eligibility Criteria
2025 ASCO Annual Meeting
Asaf Maoz, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham/Harvard Medical School, discusses the sensitivity of age and family history criteria for determining eligibility for pancreatic cancer surveillance among individuals with a hereditary risk for the malignancy (Abstract 10500).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Our study looked at pancreatic cancer surveillance eligibility criteria among individuals who have a genetic risk of pancreatic cancer. Individuals who carry a pathogenic germline variant in a pancreatic cancer predisposition gene have an elevated risk of pancreatic cancer over the lifetime, and when surveillance has been done for these individuals, we have seen that this results in an earlier stage at diagnosis and improved survival compared with historical cohorts. However, not everyone who carries a pathogenic germline variant that predisposes them to pancreatic cancer has been eligible for pancreatic cancer surveillance and eligibility criteria have restricted eligibility based on age and a family history of pancreatic cancer. Our study was meant to look at the proportion of pathogenic germline variant carriers who would have been eligible for pancreatic cancer surveillance at the time of their pancreatic cancer diagnosis, and we leveraged a laboratory cohort to look at this question. We had over 11,000 individuals in the cohort and over 900 individuals who had a pathogenic germline variant that predisposes them to pancreatic cancer. Our results show that the age criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance eligibility did very well, with over 85% of individuals who had a pathogenic germline variant and developed pancreatic cancer meeting the age eligibility criteria for surveillance. However, the family history criteria did poorly with only 22% of individuals who carry pathogenic germline variants and developing pancreatic cancer meeting the family history criteria when it's applicable. Our results suggest that having a family history of pancreatic cancer needs to be reevaluated as an eligibility criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance among those who have a genetic risk of pancreatic cancer. We feel that our results support the recent removal of the family history requirement for pancreatic cancer surveillance eligibility for those who have germline pathogenic variants in BRCA2 and ATM.
The ASCO Post Staff
Rami Manochakian, MD, FASCO, of Mayo Clinic Florida, offers his thoughts on findings from the primary analysis of the phase III DeLLphi-304 trial, which compared tarlatamab-dlle, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3 and CD3, with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (LBA8008).
The ASCO Post Staff
Constantine Si Lun Tam, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, of Alfred Hospital and Monash University, reviews results from the 5-year follow-up of arm C of the SEQUOIA trial of treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Abstract 7011).
The ASCO Post Staff
David R. Spigel, MD, FASCO, Chief Scientific Officer of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, reviews data on the role of a 14-gene molecular assay in selecting patients with stage IA–IIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as high risk (LBA8027).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jamie E. Chaft, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, reviews results of the NeoADAURA trial, which looked at neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract 8001).
The ASCO Post Staff
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses two abstracts on lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In Abstract 7037, liso-cel with ibrutinib demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared with liso-cel monotherapy, with statistically significant differences for complete response rate and overall response rate. In Abstract 7039, patients with R/R CLL/SLL who had received two or more prior lines of therapy had improved response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival with liso-cel compared with a real-world cohort treated with standard-of-care therapy.