Advertisement


Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, on Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes With Hormonal Therapy in Reproductive-Age Patients

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, discusses data showing that reproductive-age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who use fertility-preserving hormonal therapy seemed to have good overall survival after a 10-year follow-up (Abstract 5508).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
What we are going to look at is to determine the trends in and use of primary hormonal therapy use, and also long-term survival outcomes for hormonal therapy in premenopausal patient with early stage endometrial cancer. The design of this study is retrospective cohort study, and we use national cancer database which registered around 70% of newly diagnosed cases in the US. We have two major parts in this study and the fourth one is looking at the trends in and patterns of use of primary hormonal therapy in the premenopausal patient with early stage endometrial cancer. And the second one is survival outcome for the patient with early stage endometrial cancer. We included patients 18 to 49 years old and clinical stage 1 endometrial cancer and grade one [inaudible 00:01:01] 2 endometrial cancer. Main finding of our study is the utilization rate of primary hormonal therapy rose from 4% to 5% around 2004 to 2010, and it's going up to 12% to 14% in 2020. Younger age, non-white race patients who live in metropolitan area, patient who are treated at academic cancer center, patient who are treated at the facilities located at Northeast area in the US were associated with primary hormonal therapy use. In terms of tumor characteristics, grade 1 and stage 1A were associated with primary hormonal therapy use. For survival outcomes, the propensity score match cohort is well-balanced between the two primary treatment group. Overall, after 10 year follow up, the survival rate was decreased by 4.1% in hormonal therapy group compared with hysterectomy group. Hazard ratio was 1.84. In age subgroup, patient younger than 40 years old, the two primary treatment group of the survival rate was similar at any time point, five year and 10 year point. Surprisingly among age 40 to 49, the survival rate was inferior in hormonal therapy group then hysterectomy group at five year point and 10 year point. Hazard ratio was 4.94. To conclude, given the growing number of patient with early stage endometrial cancer who may desire fertility preservation, we need to consider potentially poorer prognosis when patients and provider select the primary hormonal therapy use. Shared decision making is further needed for this space and also prospective study with large sample sites should be needed for making this evidence more robust.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, on Advanced Breast Cancer: New Data on Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant From the postMONARCH Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).

Multiple Myeloma

Claudio Cerchione, MD, PhD, on Staging Multiple Myeloma: New Findings on FDG PET/CT Scans and Whole-Body MRI

Claudio Cerchione, MD, PhD, of Italy’s Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, discusses preliminary findings from a prospective trial suggesting that by adding whole-body MRI to fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) PET/CT scans, clinicians may detect bone lesions earlier and more accurately in patients with either newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma, thus translating into potentially better outcomes (Abstract 7512).

Kidney Cancer

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Biomarker Analysis of the IMmotion010 Study

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Breast Cancer

Yeon Hee Park, MD, PhD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Survival Results of the Young-PEARL Study

Yeon Hee Park, MD, PhD, of South Korea’s Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University, discusses phase II findings on palbociclib plus exemestane with a GnRH agonist vs capecitabine in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (LBA1002).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement