Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, on Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes With Hormonal Therapy in Reproductive-Age Patients
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, discusses data showing that reproductive-age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who use fertility-preserving hormonal therapy seemed to have good overall survival after a 10-year follow-up (Abstract 5508).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
What we are going to look at is to determine the trends in and use of primary hormonal therapy use, and also long-term survival outcomes for hormonal therapy in premenopausal patient with early stage endometrial cancer. The design of this study is retrospective cohort study, and we use national cancer database which registered around 70% of newly diagnosed cases in the US. We have two major parts in this study and the fourth one is looking at the trends in and patterns of use of primary hormonal therapy in the premenopausal patient with early stage endometrial cancer. And the second one is survival outcome for the patient with early stage endometrial cancer. We included patients 18 to 49 years old and clinical stage 1 endometrial cancer and grade one [inaudible 00:01:01] 2 endometrial cancer. Main finding of our study is the utilization rate of primary hormonal therapy rose from 4% to 5% around 2004 to 2010, and it's going up to 12% to 14% in 2020.
Younger age, non-white race patients who live in metropolitan area, patient who are treated at academic cancer center, patient who are treated at the facilities located at Northeast area in the US were associated with primary hormonal therapy use. In terms of tumor characteristics, grade 1 and stage 1A were associated with primary hormonal therapy use. For survival outcomes, the propensity score match cohort is well-balanced between the two primary treatment group. Overall, after 10 year follow up, the survival rate was decreased by 4.1% in hormonal therapy group compared with hysterectomy group. Hazard ratio was 1.84.
In age subgroup, patient younger than 40 years old, the two primary treatment group of the survival rate was similar at any time point, five year and 10 year point. Surprisingly among age 40 to 49, the survival rate was inferior in hormonal therapy group then hysterectomy group at five year point and 10 year point. Hazard ratio was 4.94.
To conclude, given the growing number of patient with early stage endometrial cancer who may desire fertility preservation, we need to consider potentially poorer prognosis when patients and provider select the primary hormonal therapy use. Shared decision making is further needed for this space and also prospective study with large sample sites should be needed for making this evidence more robust.
The ASCO Post Staff
Efrat Dotan, MD, of Fox Chase Cancer Center, discusses results from the phase II EA2186 trial, the first prospective study aiming to define the optimal treatment approach for vulnerable older adults with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer (Abstract 4003).
The ASCO Post Staff
Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses a network meta-analysis showing that zanubrutinib appears to be the most efficacious Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It offers delayed disease progression and favorable survival and response, compared with alternative BTK inhibitors (Abstract 7048).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).
Ciara C. O’Sullivan, MD, MBBCh, of Mayo Clinic, discusses three studies of treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and their clinical implications: the EMERALD trial of eribulin and taxane; the Patricia Cohort C trial of palbociclib plus trastuzumab and endocrine therapy; and DB07 on trastuzumab deruxtecan with or without palbociclib.
The ASCO Post Staff
Jean-Marc Classe, MD, PhD, of France’s Nantes Université, discusses phase III results showing that systematic lymphadenectomy should be omitted in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes, as well as those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval complete surgery (LBA5505).