Advertisement


Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, on Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Update on Use of Epcoritamab Plus Chemotherapy

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses data reaffirming the efficacy and feasibility of using epcoritamab plus R-DHAX/C (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin or carboplatin) in autologous stem cell transplant–eligible patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Response rates were reported to be high, and most patients proceeded to transplant (Abstract 7032).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
For patients with relapsed refractory diffused large B-cell lymphoma salvage chemo-immunotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant is potentially curative, but 40 to 60% of patients can't proceed to a stem cell transplant generally due to an insufficient response to chemo-immunotherapy, and outcomes are particularly poor for patients with primary refractory disease or those with early relapse or sero rates are as low as 7%. ZUMA seven trial did show an overall survival benefit to second-line CAR T-cell; however, many patients are not candidates for CAR T or face barriers to treatment, including the distance away from a tertiary care medical center, barriers to treatment including distance away, comorbidities or rapid disease progression. And there's a need for better treatment options. Epcoritamab is a subcutaneously administered CD3, CD20 bispecific antibody and has been approved for the treatment of adults with relapsed refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy and has been shown to be safe and effective in combination with standard treatments including Rituximab and chemotherapies. This is a phase two trial evaluating the combination of Epco plus R-DHAX in patients with transplant eligible, relapsed, or refractory diffused large B-cell lymphoma. The primary objective of the escalation part was the rate of dose-limiting toxicity and safety and tolerability. The primary endpoint of the expansion was overall response rate. In the expansion cohort, Epcoritamab was given until high dose chemotherapy and ontological stem cell transplant or until disease progression. As of January 2024, twenty-nine patients had received treatment. The median age was 58 and most patients had primary refractory disease or had progressed within 12 months of initial therapy. With a median follow-up time of 27.7 months, 55% of patients had proceeded to stem cell transplant. Median [inaudible 00:01:58] of dose intensity was high. Response rates were high overall, as well as in high risk subgroups with an overall response rate of 71%, and a CR rate of 63% in patients with primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months of initial therapy. Median time to response and complete response is 1.4 and 1.5 months, respectively, in the overall population. With 27 months of median follow-up, complete responses were durable, including among high risk patients who received autologous stem cell transplant. An estimated 60% of patients including high risk patients were progression free at 24 months. All of the high risk patients who received autologous stem cell transplant all were progression free at 24 months, and Kaplan-Meier curves show that most patients, including high risk patients were alive at 24 months. Patients who proceeded to a stem cell transplant had durable remissions and five patients continued into upgraded to have monotherapy instead of transplant, two of whom had durable responses and remain on therapy beyond 30 months. The most common treatment emergent adverse events were hematologic toxicity and treatment emergent adverse events that led to R-DHAX dose modification, and discontinuation occurred in 11 and 3% of three patients, respectively. One patient had ICANN, which was grade two and resolved. Clinical tumor lysis syndrome did not occur, and there were no fatal treatment emergent adverse events. CRS was low grade occurring in 45% of patients, all grade one to two with no grade three or higher cytokine release syndrome and most commonly occurred on day 15 after the first full dose of treatment. No CRS events led to Epcoritamab discontinuation. In conclusion, with longer follow-up and new high-risk subgroup analyses, the efficacy and feasibility of Epcoritamab with R-DHAX, an auto-eligible DLBCL, support further exploration of this regimen for patients who are unable to proceed to CAR T or various to CAR T access.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Dejan Juric, MD, on Breast Cancer: Updates From the INAVO120 Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Dejan Juric, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discuss phase III findings on first-line use of inavolisib or placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who relapsed within 12 months of completing adjuvant endocrine therapy (Abstract 1003).

Gynecologic Cancers

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, on Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes With Hormonal Therapy in Reproductive-Age Patients

Yukio Suzuki, MD, PhD, of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, discusses data showing that reproductive-age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who use fertility-preserving hormonal therapy seemed to have good overall survival after a 10-year follow-up (Abstract 5508).

Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, on Lung Cancer: Telehealth vs In-Person Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement