Advertisement


Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as gene‐expression signatures for tumor‐induced proliferation, PD‐L1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The KEYNOTE study is actually the study that established first-line combination VEGF-TKI, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, as a standard therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer. The study has met several endpoint, progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rate showing that the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is superior to sunitinib. And here, what we did during the 2024 ASCO, great meeting by the way, we looked at baseline PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, specific gene alteration by interrogating whole exome, and gene expression pattern using RNA-Seq. We did not have samples on all the patient from the full analysis, but the large subset we had on had similar baseline characteristic as the whole cohort. What we concluded is the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab does work irrespective of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. It showed that it worked and had a longer progression-free survival and improved response rate over sunitinib regardless of specific kidney cancer driver gene alteration, and these driver gene alteration are essentially the top mutated gene in kidney cancer, VHL, PBRM1, [inaudible 00:01:37], BAP1, KDM5C, but the combination is superior to sunitinib irrespective. And finally, we did look at a specific molecular subtype and gene expression, but the gene expression where the past several years reported specific to renal cell or not, but we looked at specific signature for renal cell cancer, the clusters, and universally, it showed that pembrolizumab-lenvatinib does work irrespective of any molecular subtypes, whether it's the angiogenesis subtype, the immune proliferative, et cetera. We will continue trying to find biomarkers specific to one therapy, and despite that this is a bit on the negative side, I think it's important to show that what doesn't work as biomarker as important show what does work.

Related Videos

Multiple Myeloma

Xavier P. Leleu, MD, PhD, on Multiple Myeloma: Update on Isatuximab, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, and Bortezomib

Xavier P. Leleu, MD, PhD, of France’s Université de Poitiers and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, discusses phase III findings showing that isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone deepened responses and increased the rate of measurable residual disease negativity vs isatuximab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (Abstract 7501).

Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, on Lung Cancer: Telehealth vs In-Person Palliative Care

Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Adagrasib vs Docetaxel in KRAS G12C–Mutated Disease

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses phase III findings from the KRYSTAL-12 study, which showed that adagrasib improved progression-free survival and overall response rate over docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS G12C mutation who had previously received a platinum-based chemotherapy with anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

Skin Cancer

Omid Hamid, MD, on Cutaneous Melanoma: Update on a Bispecific Protein Under Study

Omid Hamid, MD, of The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai affiliate, discusses updated data on IMC-F106C, a novel bispecific protein that, in a phase I safety and efficacy study, exhibited clinical activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A phase III trial of IMC-F106C with nivolumab in the first-line setting of metastatic disease has been initiated (NCT06112314; Abstract 9507).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement