Advertisement


Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as geneexpression signatures for tumorinduced proliferation, PDL1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The KEYNOTE study is actually the study that established first-line combination VEGF-TKI, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, as a standard therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer. The study has met several endpoint, progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rate showing that the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is superior to sunitinib. And here, what we did during the 2024 ASCO, great meeting by the way, we looked at baseline PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, specific gene alteration by interrogating whole exome, and gene expression pattern using RNA-Seq. We did not have samples on all the patient from the full analysis, but the large subset we had on had similar baseline characteristic as the whole cohort. What we concluded is the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab does work irrespective of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. It showed that it worked and had a longer progression-free survival and improved response rate over sunitinib regardless of specific kidney cancer driver gene alteration, and these driver gene alteration are essentially the top mutated gene in kidney cancer, VHL, PBRM1, [inaudible 00:01:37], BAP1, KDM5C, but the combination is superior to sunitinib irrespective. And finally, we did look at a specific molecular subtype and gene expression, but the gene expression where the past several years reported specific to renal cell or not, but we looked at specific signature for renal cell cancer, the clusters, and universally, it showed that pembrolizumab-lenvatinib does work irrespective of any molecular subtypes, whether it's the angiogenesis subtype, the immune proliferative, et cetera. We will continue trying to find biomarkers specific to one therapy, and despite that this is a bit on the negative side, I think it's important to show that what doesn't work as biomarker as important show what does work.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on the DEB Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III results on the use of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with double expression of MYC and BCL2. The regimen appeared to improve event-free survival and complete response rates vs R-CHOP in the front-line setting. As this is an interim analysis, longer-term follow-up will be needed to better understand its impact, says Dr. Riedell.

Lung Cancer

Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).

Breast Cancer

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, on HER2-Positive and PAM50 Luminal Breast Cancer: Primary Results From the PATRICIA Trial

Eva M. Ciruelos, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Hospital 12 de Octubre and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, discusses phase II data showing that the combination of palbociclib, trastuzumab, and endocrine therapy improved progression-free survival in patients with previously treated PAM50 luminal A or B, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, as compared with treatment of physicians’ choice (Abstract 1008).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Leukemia
Lymphoma

Muhit Özcan, MD, on CLL/SLL: Report on a Still-Recruiting International Study of Nemtabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Rituximab

Muhit Özcan, MD, of Turkey’s Ankara University School of Medicine, discusses the ongoing phase III BELLWAVE-010 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax vs venetoclax plus rituximab in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Abstract TPS7089).  

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement