Advertisement


Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, on RCC: Biomarker Analysis From the CLEAR Trial

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, FASCO, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses phase III findings showing that, in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the benefit of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in overall response rate does not appear to be affected by such factors as gene‐expression signatures for tumor‐induced proliferation, PD‐L1 status, or the mutation status of RCC driver genes.



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The KEYNOTE study is actually the study that established first-line combination VEGF-TKI, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, as a standard therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer. The study has met several endpoint, progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rate showing that the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is superior to sunitinib. And here, what we did during the 2024 ASCO, great meeting by the way, we looked at baseline PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, specific gene alteration by interrogating whole exome, and gene expression pattern using RNA-Seq. We did not have samples on all the patient from the full analysis, but the large subset we had on had similar baseline characteristic as the whole cohort. What we concluded is the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab does work irrespective of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. It showed that it worked and had a longer progression-free survival and improved response rate over sunitinib regardless of specific kidney cancer driver gene alteration, and these driver gene alteration are essentially the top mutated gene in kidney cancer, VHL, PBRM1, [inaudible 00:01:37], BAP1, KDM5C, but the combination is superior to sunitinib irrespective. And finally, we did look at a specific molecular subtype and gene expression, but the gene expression where the past several years reported specific to renal cell or not, but we looked at specific signature for renal cell cancer, the clusters, and universally, it showed that pembrolizumab-lenvatinib does work irrespective of any molecular subtypes, whether it's the angiogenesis subtype, the immune proliferative, et cetera. We will continue trying to find biomarkers specific to one therapy, and despite that this is a bit on the negative side, I think it's important to show that what doesn't work as biomarker as important show what does work.

Related Videos

Leukemia
Lymphoma

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on CLL/SLL: Updated Findings on Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses up to 5.5 years of follow-up data from the phase II CAPTIVATE study, showing that in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), fixed duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax continues to provide clinically meaningful progression-free disease in those with high-risk genomic features as well as in the overall population (Abstract 7009).

Skin Cancer

Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).

Bladder Cancer

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Expert Commentary on Two Key Abstracts

Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).

Multiple Myeloma

Paula Rodríguez-Otero, MD, PhD, and Amrita Y. Krishnan, MD, on Multiple Myeloma: Moving BCMA-Directed Therapies to Earlier Use

Paula Rodríguez-Otero, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, and Amrita Y. Krishnan, MD, of the City of Hope Cancer Center, discuss two key studies on B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies: CARTITUDE-4 on ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with functional high-risk multiple myeloma; and DREAMM-7 on belantamab mafodotin-blmf plus bortezomib and dexamethasone vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Breast Cancer

Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, on Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis From DESTINY-Breast07

Fabrice Andre, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy and the Université Paris-Saclay, discusses a dose-expansion interim analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) monotherapy and T-DXd plus pertuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (Abstract 1009).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement