Advertisement


Muhit Özcan, MD, on CLL/SLL: Report on a Still-Recruiting International Study of Nemtabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Rituximab

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Muhit Özcan, MD, of Turkey’s Ankara University School of Medicine, discusses the ongoing phase III BELLWAVE-010 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax vs venetoclax plus rituximab in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Abstract TPS7089).  



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
[Inaudible 00:00:08] is a standard of care option for patients with CLL, SLL, who have relapsed after at least one line of prior therapy. However, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments. Bruton tyrosine kinase, BTK, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CLL. Nemtabrutinib is a BTK inhibitor that targets both wild-type and C-481 mutant forms of BTK, in the ongoing BELLWAVE-001 study, nemtabrutinib demonstrates manageable safety and durable anti-tumor activity in patients with refractory relapse, CLL, SLL, with and without C-481 mutations. The randomized open-label phase III BELLWAVE zero-tense study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax versus VR as a second line or later treatment for patients with RR CLL, SLL. Eligible patients are aged more than 18 years with active refractory relapse CLL, SLL after at least one line on prior therapy per IW-CLL 2018 criteria, and equal performance status of zero to two approximately 720 patients will be enrolled in two parts. Part one is an open-label, non-randomized dose escalation and confirmation phase to evaluate safety, and determine the optimal dose of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax. Part one will enroll 30 patients to establish the dose of nemtabrutinib, using a modified toxicity probability interval design. Patients will receive nemtabrutinib at two dose levels. 45 milligram per day parallel Q-day, starting dose. Escalating to six five milligram parallel Q-day for 28 days, followed by nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax ramp up over four weeks. Part two is an open-label parallel group randomized phase comparing the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax with VR. In part two, approximately 690 patients will be randomly assigned one-to-one to receive either nemtabrutinib at recommended dose for 28 days, followed by the nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax, or venetoclax plus rituximab. Study treatment will continue for approximately two years, or until an acceptable toxicity, disease progression, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Randomization will be certified by BTKC-481 mutation status, geographic region, and risk group. The primary endpoint for part two is progression free survival by Blinded Independent Central Review, BICR, per IWCLL 2018 criteria. Secondary endpoints for part two are: Undetectable, minimal residual disease in bone marrow at month 14 by central laboratory assessment, objective response rate and duration of response by BICR per IWCLL 2018 criteria, Overall survival and safety. Exploratory endpoints are overall response rate, including partial response with lymphocytosis, pharmacokinetics, and heart-related quality of life. Recruitment is ongoing.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Emily L. Podany, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Racial Differences in Genomic Profiles and Targeted Treatment Use

Emily L. Podany, MD, of Washington University, St. Louis, discusses disparities in the use of PI3K inhibitors for Black patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer while other drugs that do not require genomic profiling were similarly used (Abstract 1017). 

Lymphoma

Peter Riedell, MD, on DLBCL: Expert Commentary on Data From the ECHELON-3 Study

Peter Riedell, MD, of The University of Chicago, discusses phase III findings on the regimen of brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This therapy demonstrated a survival advantage in the third-line setting, but as this is an interim analysis, questions remain regarding long-term safety and duration of response, according to Dr. Riedell (Abstract LBA7005).

Leukemia

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Update on BTK Inhibitors

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses a network meta-analysis showing that zanubrutinib appears to be the most efficacious Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It offers delayed disease progression and favorable survival and response, compared with alternative BTK inhibitors (Abstract 7048).

 

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Skin Cancer

Omid Hamid, MD, on Cutaneous Melanoma: Update on a Bispecific Protein Under Study

Omid Hamid, MD, of The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai affiliate, discusses updated data on IMC-F106C, a novel bispecific protein that, in a phase I safety and efficacy study, exhibited clinical activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A phase III trial of IMC-F106C with nivolumab in the first-line setting of metastatic disease has been initiated (NCT06112314; Abstract 9507).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement