Advertisement


Muhit Özcan, MD, on CLL/SLL: Report on a Still-Recruiting International Study of Nemtabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Rituximab

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Muhit Özcan, MD, of Turkey’s Ankara University School of Medicine, discusses the ongoing phase III BELLWAVE-010 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax vs venetoclax plus rituximab in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Abstract TPS7089).  



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
[Inaudible 00:00:08] is a standard of care option for patients with CLL, SLL, who have relapsed after at least one line of prior therapy. However, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments. Bruton tyrosine kinase, BTK, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CLL. Nemtabrutinib is a BTK inhibitor that targets both wild-type and C-481 mutant forms of BTK, in the ongoing BELLWAVE-001 study, nemtabrutinib demonstrates manageable safety and durable anti-tumor activity in patients with refractory relapse, CLL, SLL, with and without C-481 mutations. The randomized open-label phase III BELLWAVE zero-tense study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax versus VR as a second line or later treatment for patients with RR CLL, SLL. Eligible patients are aged more than 18 years with active refractory relapse CLL, SLL after at least one line on prior therapy per IW-CLL 2018 criteria, and equal performance status of zero to two approximately 720 patients will be enrolled in two parts. Part one is an open-label, non-randomized dose escalation and confirmation phase to evaluate safety, and determine the optimal dose of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax. Part one will enroll 30 patients to establish the dose of nemtabrutinib, using a modified toxicity probability interval design. Patients will receive nemtabrutinib at two dose levels. 45 milligram per day parallel Q-day, starting dose. Escalating to six five milligram parallel Q-day for 28 days, followed by nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax ramp up over four weeks. Part two is an open-label parallel group randomized phase comparing the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax with VR. In part two, approximately 690 patients will be randomly assigned one-to-one to receive either nemtabrutinib at recommended dose for 28 days, followed by the nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax, or venetoclax plus rituximab. Study treatment will continue for approximately two years, or until an acceptable toxicity, disease progression, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Randomization will be certified by BTKC-481 mutation status, geographic region, and risk group. The primary endpoint for part two is progression free survival by Blinded Independent Central Review, BICR, per IWCLL 2018 criteria. Secondary endpoints for part two are: Undetectable, minimal residual disease in bone marrow at month 14 by central laboratory assessment, objective response rate and duration of response by BICR per IWCLL 2018 criteria, Overall survival and safety. Exploratory endpoints are overall response rate, including partial response with lymphocytosis, pharmacokinetics, and heart-related quality of life. Recruitment is ongoing.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on BRAF-Mutated Melanoma: Long-Term Follow-up of Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib vs Placebo

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses final results with up to 10 years’ follow-up data of the COMBI-AD study of patients with stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma who received adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (Abstract 9500).

Skin Cancer

Pauline Funchain, MD, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab

Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).

Lung Cancer

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, on NSCLC: Adagrasib vs Docetaxel in KRAS G12C–Mutated Disease

Tony S.K. Mok, MD, of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, discusses phase III findings from the KRYSTAL-12 study, which showed that adagrasib improved progression-free survival and overall response rate over docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer harboring a KRAS G12C mutation who had previously received a platinum-based chemotherapy with anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.

Skin Cancer

Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).

Breast Cancer

Lisa A. Carey, MD, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, on Advanced Breast Cancer: New Data on Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant From the postMONARCH Trial

Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement