Advertisement


Joshua D. Brody, MD, on Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Joshua D. Brody, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses results from the EPCORE NHL-2 study, which was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epcoritamab-bysp plus rituximab and lenalidomide in the first-line setting for patients with follicular lymphoma and to assess epcoritamab as maintenance therapy in this population (Abstract 7014).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Today we're going to present data about the arm six and seven from the NHL-2 trial. And these are exciting because they are combinations of epcoritamab, a bispecific antibody, with different standards of care for different subsets of lymphoma. So the arm six and arm seven are treating patients in primarily frontline follicular lymphoma, and the arm six trial is combining epcoritamab with a standard of care, rituximab plus Revlimid, lenalidomide. We sometimes call it R-squared. And the arm six is 41 patients with epcoritamab plus R-squared. Primary endpoints here are efficacy. And this was very exciting because R-squared, a standard of care, are very good therapy, but a very imperfect therapy. We have probably less than half of patients, about 48%, in the big RELEVANCE trial from a few years ago with R-squared getting complete remissions. So good, but a lot of room for improvement. And the big punchline of the epcoritamab plus R-squared arm six is that 85% of patients were having complete remissions, quite awesome, and the vast majority of those remissions were ongoing for at least more than 18 months. Median follow up here was about 22 months. So most of these remissions appear to be durable. And again, most patients on the study had complete remissions. And this is despite the fact that these were a standard cohort of patients, about average age for most follicular lymphoma trials, and the majority with advanced stage, the majority with FLIPI scores of two to five. So in this now medium-sized trial, 40 patients, great results and pretty good durability of those remissions. And the safety here looked to be very good. Most of the side effects that we saw were similar to those to R-squared alone. And the epcoritamab-specific side effects that we saw were a couple, primarily cytokine release syndrome. CRS in this trial was completely low-grade, grade one, grade two. About half of patients had CRS, but, again, low-grade and most of those grade one. So other than that, the safety seemed to be similar to R-squared in most ways. There was neutropenia in about 44% of patients, but no febrile neutropenia, the thing we worry most about. And so this is such positive data that we're excited to see further development of this regimen. There are ongoing trials now for epcor plus R-squared in the frontline, a randomized trial, and also for second-line follicular lymphoma patients. And I'll just say a little bit about arm seven of the trial. This is studying maintenance epcoritamab therapy after any standard of care induction, mostly for patients in the first-line. There was a small number of patients in the second-line or beyond, but primarily frontline patients who were in partial or complete remission from whatever their standard of care, R-chemo or otherwise, was. And the exciting result here was that, out of 20 patients, all of the patients who were in a partial remission going to the trial then transferred into complete remission. And these complete remissions, again, for almost all of the patients, appear to be quite durable. Again, median follow up here, just beyond 22 months. So we can use epcoritamab as part of a frontline combination regimen, and we can use it as a maintenance afterwards. And the safety signals, again, low-grade CRS, no patients having grade three or above CRS, and overall grade one CRS in about a third of patients. So, pretty well tolerated, pretty durable remission so far. Another way we can incorporate these novel immunotherapies into or just after frontline therapies.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, on Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Update on Use of Epcoritamab Plus Chemotherapy

Yasmin H. Karimi, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses data reaffirming the efficacy and feasibility of using epcoritamab plus R-DHAX/C (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin or carboplatin) in autologous stem cell transplant–eligible patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Response rates were reported to be high, and most patients proceeded to transplant (Abstract 7032).

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Skin Cancer

Axel Hauschild, MD, on Melanoma: Findings From the PIVOTAL Trial of Daromun vs Surgery

Axel Hauschild, MD, of Germany’s University of Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, discusses phase III study results on neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs immediate surgery for patients with fully resectable, locally advanced melanoma (Abstract LBA9501).

Breast Cancer

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Weighing the Prognostic Value of ctDNA Detection

Sherene Loi, MD, PhD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the monarchE trial. This large cohort was studied to look at the usefulness of a personalized tumor-informed assay for ctDNA detection in early stage high-risk patients (LBA507).

Lung Cancer

Heather Wakelee, MD, on NSCLC: IMpower010 Survival Results After Long-Term Follow-up of Atezolizumab vs Best Supportive Care

Heather Wakelee, MD, of Stanford University Medical Center, discusses phase III findings showing that the disease-free survival benefit with adjuvant atezolizumab continues to translate into a positive overall survival trend vs best supportive care in patients with stage II–IIIA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These results further support the use of adjuvant atezolizumab in PD-L1–selected populations, according to Dr. Wakelee (LBA8035).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement