Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on BRAF-Mutated Melanoma: Long-Term Follow-up of Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib vs Placebo
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses final results with up to 10 years’ follow-up data of the COMBI-AD study of patients with stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma who received adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (Abstract 9500).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
COMBI-AD trial is a randomized phase three clinical trial of adjuvant dabrafenib combined with trametinib versus placebo for resected stage three BRAF mutated melanoma. The final analysis, the long-term data and the overall survival data were presented and show a durable and sustained benefit in terms of relapse-free survival when patients received dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo. There was a 48% reduction in the risk of recurrence with nearly 10 years of follow-up. In fact, the median follow-up was 100 months for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 82 months for placebo, and the maximum follow-up was 125 months. So when we look at the relapse-free survival and look at the eight-year relapse-free survival landmark, we saw 50% for dabrafenib and trametinib, which was much higher than the 35% we saw for placebo. Again, we saw a sustained and durable improvement in the distant metastasis-free survival with a hazard ratio of 0.56, that's a 44% reduction in the risk of distant metastasis at first recurrence. So therefore, the two major endpoints were statistically significant with confidence intervals that did not cross one demonstrating this durable and sustained impact of adjuvant dabrafenib-trametinib.
The overall survival showed a separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves with a 20% reduction in the risk of death from any cause using adjuvant dabrafenib-trametinib versus placebo. This is a hazard ratio of 0.80. However, the confidence interval just nudged over one, 1.01, and the P-value is 0.063 so this was not statistically significant. We will not see an adjuvant trial which has any separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves. So this is substantial for the modern era of melanoma treatments when we know that we can cure patients in the advanced setting to see any separation of the overall survival curves in the stage three setting.
What was remarkable is if we looked at the subgroup of V600E, they seem to benefit the most in terms of overall survival. The dabrafenib-trametinib hazard ratio versus placebo was 0.75, that's a 25% risk reduction terms of death using adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for those with the V600E and that was 91% of the trial population. However, for V600K, which was a small subgroup, there was a reversal, the placebo arm seemed to do better than dabrafenib-trametinib, but we have to exercise caution with only 40 and 37 patients in each arm for that analysis, but it does suggest that the main benefit seems to be in patients with V600E melanoma. Interestingly, the relapse-free survival benefit with dabrafenib and trametinib was seen for both V600E, and V600K. So it was only the overall survival where we saw really the substantial benefit in the V600E.
So what does this mean for the future? It means that we have a treatment that can be used for BRAF V600 mutated patients for adjuvant therapy for resected stage three. There were no irreversible toxicities with this long-term follow-up data, and we saw a sustained and durable impact on the relapse-free survival, the distant metastasis-free survival, and we did see a numerical improvement in the overall survival as well as the melanoma-specific survival, a very important endpoint as we cure more patients with melanoma.
The ASCO Post Staff
Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, discuss phase III findings from two studies: the first, investigating enfortumab vedotin-ejfv and pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer; and the second, looking at nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with lymph node–only metastatic disease enrolled in the CheckMate 901 trial (Abstracts 4581 and 4565).
The ASCO Post Staff
Joshua D. Brody, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses results from the EPCORE NHL-2 study, which was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epcoritamab-bysp plus rituximab and lenalidomide in the first-line setting for patients with follicular lymphoma and to assess epcoritamab as maintenance therapy in this population (Abstract 7014).
The ASCO Post Staff
David J. Andorsky, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, discusses EPCORE NHL-6, an ongoing study of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). As outpatients, the study participants were given subcutaneous epcoritamab-bysp to see whether they could be safely monitored and cytokine-release syndrome appropriately managed in the outpatient setting (Abstract 7029).
The ASCO Post Staff
Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses phase III findings of the AXLerate-OC trial, showing that batiraxcept with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer whose tumors were AXL-high in an exploratory analysis (LBA5515).
The ASCO Post Staff
Jeanne Tie, MD, MBChB, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, discusses data on survival and updated 5-year results from the DYNAMIC trial, which supports a role for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, including serial sampling, in the management of patients with stage II colon cancer (Abstract 108).