Advertisement


Claudio Cerchione, MD, PhD, on Staging Multiple Myeloma: New Findings on FDG PET/CT Scans and Whole-Body MRI

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Claudio Cerchione, MD, PhD, of Italy’s Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, discusses preliminary findings from a prospective trial suggesting that by adding whole-body MRI to fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) PET/CT scans, clinicians may detect bone lesions earlier and more accurately in patients with either newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma, thus translating into potentially better outcomes (Abstract 7512).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
In [the] last year, we have seen a great therapeutic revolution in multiple myeloma, according to many new drugs and new combination that have been approved and registered. However, I think that we should also concentrate and optimize the use of therapeutic solution and of novelties that we have seen in last years, thanks to the concentration on diagnostic tools. In this institution that we have realized, in my cancer center, we have seen the combination between whole body MRI, together with the PET FDG, which is the standard of care worldwide, both in patient newly diagnosed in relapsed refractory. And we have checked these diagnostic tools, is smoldering myeloma, as you can see in another poster presentation. Also, a task for 2024. We have seen that the combination of the double technique can totally change the journey of our patient, particularly thanks to the accuracy of whole body MRI, that is of about 97 as we have seen. And we have studied 73 patients, both newly diagnosed in the relapsed refractory. In which we have seen that in 26% of them, the combination of techniques can change their journey, particularly changing the potential treatment that we can anticipate before that signs and symptoms arise. And I think that this is particularly important because we can start to treat the patient before that he is going to suffer for myeloma pains. In particular, the combination of whole body MRI together with FDG-PET, can better characterize the bone lesion that are the main characteristic for which we treat the patient in multiple diagnosis and relapse and refractory setting. And this was the first part of the study, the radiomic part that we have presented here. But we are going to, in some way, potentiate to the study, adding a biologic characterization of our patient, in which we want to develop new biomarkers' evaluation, in the idea of having a biomarkers driven approach in next future studying metabolomic pathways. In order to start maybe to think to a dream, the personalized medicine in multiple myeloma. Which thanks to this multiomic study, we can better characterize, thanks to new generation tools our patient, and really optimize the exact drug for every patient. I think that the time is mature to concentrate on also a new prognostic score in multiple myeloma because we have seen a changing over the treatment, both in newly [inaudible 00:02:40] and the relapsed refractory setting. But we should now concentrate in changing the prognostic index that is of many years ago. This is the way to optimize all what we offer to our patient. Not only in terms of treatment, but also in terms of lifetime expectancy. And thanks to biological characterization that we are performing inside this study, we dream also to think about an MRD evaluation that could take to maybe a treatment-free remission or to optimize the dosing, dose dense and dose intensity of the drug, imagining to in some way have the patient not in ongoing treatment. And this is what they want. However, I think that the optimization of diagnostic tools can be in some way something that will help us to run toward the cure in multiple myeloma. That is not so far, and this is the best wish that we give to our patients, to their caregivers, and to all myeloma researchers around the world.

Related Videos

Clifford A. Hudis, MD: A Message From ASCO’s CEO

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), talks about the 2024 Annual Meeting, and a focus on the compassionate side of cancer care.

Skin Cancer

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Potentially Practice-Changing Results From the NADINA Trial

Christian U. Blank, MD, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, discusses findings of an investigator-initiated phase III trial showing that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-driven adjuvant treatment improved event-free survival in patients with macroscopic, resectable stage III melanoma compared with adjuvant nivolumab (LBA2)

Leukemia

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Update on BTK Inhibitors

Mazyar Shadman, MD, MPH, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, discusses a network meta-analysis showing that zanubrutinib appears to be the most efficacious Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It offers delayed disease progression and favorable survival and response, compared with alternative BTK inhibitors (Abstract 7048).

 

Gastroesophageal Cancer

Jens Marquardt, MD, and Jens Hoeppner, MD, on Esophageal Cancer: Phase III Findings on Chemotherapy vs Chemoradiation

Jens Marquardt, MD, of the University of Lübeck, and Jens Hoeppner, MD, of the University of Bielefeld, discuss findings from the ESOPEC trial, which showed that perioperative chemotherapy (fluorouracii, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) and surgery improves survival in patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (41.4 Gy plus carboplatin and paclitaxel) followed by surgery (LBA1).

Lung Cancer

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, on NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields for Brain Metastases

Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement