Advertisement


Rana R. McKay, MD, and Toni K. Choueiri, MD, on RCC: New Findings on Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Cabozantinib

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Rana R. McKay, MD, of the University of California, San Diego, and Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, discuss results from the phase III CONTACT-03 study, showing that, for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), adding the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to cabozantinib did not improve clinical outcomes compared with treatment with cabozantinib alone. In addition, higher toxicities were observed in the combination arm (Abstract LBA4500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Rana R McKay: So tell us a little bit about the CONTACT-03 big phase III study that's getting presented at ASCO today. What's the rationale behind why this study was even designed? Toni K Choueiri: I think it's important study, that what we see in practice, that's taking observation from clinic and taking them to a randomized controlled trial. So in clinic we have been seeing a patient being re-challenged with immune checkpoint inhibitor after prior tumor progression on immune checkpoint inhibitor. We've seen it on the genitourinary cancers, we've seen it in kidney cancer, we've seen it in bladder cancer. We hear and there are publications from real world data about other cancers and when you look at the literature, there isn't much randomized studies there, if any. Rana R McKay: So tell me a little bit about the design of CONTACT-03. What is the study? How was it designed? What's the schema? Toni K Choueiri: So the biggest thing was to look if we challenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor has any effect, should we do that? And we use renal cell cancer as a model, self-serving because that's what I treat. And because we could do a study where the study would be A versus A plus B, where the B is the PD-L1 inhibitor, let's say. So in this situation, patients which tumor progressed on prior immune checkpoint inhibitor. And here I don't mean CTLA-4 inhibitor or other, I mean PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Which we randomized to a TKI cabozantinib at full dose versus cabozantinib plus atezolizumab. Why atezolizumab? PD-L1 inhibitor has single agent activity in metastatic untreated RCC 25%. Plays well with other drugs, so there is a safety data with cabozantinib. And also does not have a major place, or I would say any place, in untreated patient with all the other studies. Rana R McKay: Yeah. Toni K Choueiri: So we conducted that study over 500 patients were randomized. The usual stratification factors here, IMDC risk factor, prior adjuvant, first line, second line. We allowed one prior VEGF inhibitor. Usually that's what the patient receive. And progression-free survival was a primary endpoint. There was really no benefit. Rana R McKay: Yes. Toni K Choueiri: Median progression-free survival was the same in both arm, around over 10 months with cabo single agent or combination, response rate 40%. What we also found, no overall survival, not even a trend. We tried to look at specific subgroups. Our patient who have not received a VEGF TKI, almost 30%, these are probably patients that had nivolumab, ipilimumab. Do they have some benefit compared to the one who were pre-exposed? No. Rana R McKay: Yeah. Toni K Choueiri: We looked at several subgroup, there was nothing there. And also if you look at the toxicity profile, there is no new safety signal. That's great. But overall, at least numerically the toxicities are higher in the combination. Rana R McKay: This is a very relevant study because in clinical practice a lot of people are layering on the TKI post-progression on IO and a lot of times actually you're even compromising the dose of the TKI because you're not able to do full dose of the TKI, whether it be cabozantinib or a different TKI. But this was a really practice changing study. Do you think it's going to actually impact practice come Monday morning? Toni K Choueiri: I think possibly, at least in renal cell cancer. Now I have to say there are two caveat. Could I generalize it first to other solid tumor? Maybe, but the studies should be done. The second thing, this is a PD-L1 inhibitor. In renal cell cancer we know that at least from the frontline data and the adjuvant data that PD-1 inhibitor have been superior. They've shown survival benefit. Let's put it that way, they have work, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, where other PD-L1 inhibitor have worked less. Rana R McKay: Okay. Toni K Choueiri: So could it be due to the PD-L1 inhibitor? Having said so, we have a second study, very similar called TiNivo-2, which our renal cell community has invested in. And that study replaces cabozantinib with tivozanib and uses nivolumab. So that's a PD-1 inhibitor. That study is just finishing accrual and hopefully will get us- Rana R McKay: Yeah. Toni K Choueiri: An answer about PD-1 post-progression prior PD-1/PD-L1. Rana R McKay: Very important study. And I think too, the dosing of the cabozantinib was critical here at 60 milligram standard dosing. Really, cabozantinib has tremendous activity in the modern era and this study showed that. Toni K Choueiri: 40% response rate, whether on independent center review or on investigator assessment. PFS over 10 months. I agree with you. Rana R McKay: Yeah. Toni K Choueiri: That's a bar that is somewhat high. Rana R McKay: Well, thank you so much for this groundbreaking study. I think it's definitely going to inform practice on utilization of IO/post-IO. Thank you, Toni. Toni K Choueiri: Thank you so much.

Related Videos

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, on Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Luspatercept and Epoetin Alfa in Lower-Risk Disease

Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the COMMANDS trial. Compared with epoetin alfa, luspatercept improved red blood cell transfusion independence and erythroid response, as well as the duration of response in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent–naive, transfusion-dependent patients with lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (Abstract 7003).

Leukemia
COVID-19

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, on New Findings on CLL, COVID-19, and Treatment With Obinutuzumab Plus Venetoclax

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results of a phase III study showing that progression-free survival with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab plus venetoclax is not superior to ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab for treatment-naive older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Long-term follow-up will determine whether there are advantages to obinutuzumab plus venetoclax, with special attention to measurable residual disease and therapy discontinuation (Abstract 7500).

CNS Cancers

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, on Glioma: Phase III Results on Vorasidenib

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, both of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss findings from the INDIGO trial showing that the IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib improves progression-free survival for patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation. These data demonstrate the clinical benefit of vorasidenib in this patient population for whom chemotherapy and radiotherapy are being delayed.

Bladder Cancer

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: New Data on Erdafitinib vs Chemotherapy From the THOR Study

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings showing that for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alteration who already had been treated with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, erdafitinib significantly improved overall and progression-free survival, as well as overall response rate, compared with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (LBA4619).

Lung Cancer

Narjust Florez, MD, and Ticiana Leal, MD, on Metastatic NSCLC: Tumor Treating Fields Therapy After Platinum Resistance

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ticiana Leal, MD, of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the use of tumor treating fields therapy, in which electric fields disrupt processes critical for cancer cell viability. Already approved by the FDA to treat glioblastoma and mesothelioma, the treatment has extended overall survival in this phase III study of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, without exacerbating systemic toxicities (Abstract LBA9005).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement