Advertisement


Claire Roddie, PhD, MBChB, on B-ALL: Safety and Efficacy Data of Obecabtagene Autoleucel

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Claire Roddie, PhD, MBChB, of University College London, discusses results of the FELIX study, which showed that the second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy obecabtagene autoleucel is safe for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, even those with a high burden of disease. This agent yielded high rates of complete response and ongoing CAR T-cell persistence in most patients whose disease responded (Abstract 7000).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Claire Roddie: I'm here today to talk about the FELIX study, that's the study of obe-cel in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Essentially, obe-cel is a novel CD-19 CAR with a fast off rate CD-19 binding domain that confers less toxicity and promotes CAR T-cell persistence. We've tested it with the center I work at in London in a phase one study in 20 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and the results were so promising that it sparked this phase two endeavor, this FELIX study, which is a global study that's been sponsored by Autolus Therapeutics. To describe this study, essentially, it's an autologous CD-19 CAR T product for patients. They're leukapheresed, they then received bridging chemotherapy, fludarabine cyclophosphamide, and then they receive split dose CAR T-cell infusion over day one and day 10. Essentially, that's again to mitigate for immunotoxicity and they also have their initial dose titrated to disease burden on the prelim food depletion bone marrow.These are all safety features built into the study design. Essentially, on this study we infused 94 patients and given the split dosing, actually on this study, 94% of patients received both doses, which was a really good outcome. The patient population we were dealing with was particularly high risk, so there were a lot of patients with high burden disease. There was a significant portion with extramedullary disease, which we recognized to be a particularly high risk population, so we were dealing with a difficult patient cohort here. But despite that and despite the circulating disease and high burden disease, the manufacture process was extremely successful. 94% of our patients who were leukapheresed had a product released for infusion, which was a great outcome. The event release time on this study was 21 days median. Now in terms of outcomes for these patients, despite the heavy disease burden and the poor risk cohort, actually we saw complete responses in 76% of patients. What's more, those responses were deep responses, so MRD negative in 97% of patients, which is obviously excellent for us as physicians and a lot of those responses were durable, so 61% of the responses were ongoing at that median of 9.5 months. Again, they continued under close observation, that group. Now, this is really probably quite key, the toxicity profile. CAR T-cell therapy is sometimes not very well tolerated by patients, particularly older patients and patients with comorbidities. But this product, this obe-cel cell is unique in that regard. Also, because we're very minimal grade three immunotoxicity on this study. Only 3% of patients experienced grade three CRS and only 7% experienced grade three ICANS, so in a sense this is very different to what's been described with other CAR T-cell therapies for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It makes it a much more appealing potential therapy for these older and more challenging patients. When we look in the blood of these patients, and this is another important feature to recognize, is that at last followup, we're seeing the CAR T cells persisting in these patients right the way up until that median follow-up of 9.5 months. This product continues to proliferate within the patient bloodstream in an ongoing way, continuing to survey the body looking for disease and in an ongoing way immunologically rejecting the leukemia in the event of relapse. That's a very encouraging thing for us as well to see that persistence and we hope that that will lead to durable responses in due course. But that's where we've got to so far with the study and we look forward to updating with more followup as the months go by.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Muhit Özcan, MD, on DLBCL: Now Recruiting Previously Untreated Patients for a Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin Plus Chemotherapy

Muhit Özcan, MD, of Turkey’s Ankara University School of Medicine, discusses waveLINE-007, a two-part study now recruiting in more than 20 locations, to determine the safety and recommended phase II dose of the antibody-drug conjugate zilovertamab vedotin in combination with R-CHP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone) in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Efficacy of this regimen will be investigated in the second half of the study (Abstract TPS7589).

Skin Cancer
Immunotherapy

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Resected Melanoma: Biomarkers for and Efficacy of Adjuvant Nivolumab vs Placebo

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses new data showing that patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma who were treated with adjuvant nivolumab had prolonged recurrence-free survival compared with placebo across all biomarker subgroups. The baseline biomarkers most predictive of prolonged recurrence-free survival with nivolumab were high interferon gamma score, high tumor mutational burden, CD8 T-cell infiltration, and low C-reactive protein (Abstract 9504).

Kidney Cancer

Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, on RCC: Overall Survival Analysis of Lenvatinib, Pembrolizumab, and Sunitinib

Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, of Texas Oncology, discusses the 4-year follow-up results from the CLEAR study for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The data showed that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab continues to demonstrate clinically meaningful benefit vs sunitinib in overall and progression-free survival, as well as in overall and complete response rates, in first-line treatment (Abstract 4502).

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, on Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Standard Treatment

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South and the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, discuss phase III results from the Scandinavian NeoCol trial, which showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in terms of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colon cancer, although there are certain circumstances when this approach may have more favorable outcomes (Abstract LBA3503).

Lung Cancer

Narjust Florez, MD, and Filippo Gustavo Dall’Olio, MD, on NSCLC: New Findings on Tumor Fraction, Durvalumab, and Survival

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Filippo Gustavo Dall’Olio, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discuss circulating tumor DNA tumor fraction, and its link to survival in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with maintenance durvalumab in the UNICANCER SAFIR02-Lung/IFCT1301 trial. Tumor fraction was positive in 16% of patients randomly assigned to receive durvalumab in the study. This population seems to have a limited benefit from maintenance durvalumab after induction chemotherapy (Abstract 2516).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement