Advertisement


Bradley J. Monk, MD, on Cervical Cancer: Findings on Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Bradley J. Monk, MD, of the University of Arizona, Phoenix, and Creighton University, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-826 study of overall survival results in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Study participants received first-line treatment of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, which reduced the risk of death by up to 40% in three different subsets of patients (Abstract 5500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'd like to share with you my perspective about the treatment of women with recurrent metastatic or persistent cervical cancer. This is a group of patients that we call as the first line treatment. Now, this is a very serious problem. This is the number four cause of cancer death worldwide, and in this country, it causes more than 4,000 deaths. So historically, the treatment has been doublet chemotherapy, platinum, and taxane. And then in 2014, we added bevacizumab to it with a small improvement in overall survival of only three to four months. And here we've sat, since 2014, chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Now, immune therapy is everywhere. It got a very limited conditional approval in the second line in 2018, but we wanted to move it to the first line with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab. So on behalf of the 151 sites in 19 countries, I'd like to share with you the results of Keynote 826, which randomized 617 patients one-to-one, chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, to pembrolizumab or placebo. And that trial led to FDA approval in October 2021, but it was an interim result. It was very preliminary, and now I'd like to share with you the final result. And the final result is that when pembrolizumab is added to chemotherapy versus placebo, there was a 40% improvement in overall survival. What does that mean? That means they live a year longer. A terminal disease that now, average age of 50, live a year longer. And we might even be curing some patients. It's too early to tell. But this is a two-year treatment, six doses of chemotherapy, and then two years of total immune therapy. And then at three years, a third of the patients are now without progression and a year without treatment. There is a plateau, 30% of the patients or so. So this is a major step forward. This confirms two things. Number one, that the preliminary result is real with a year improvement overall survival. And second, that pembrolizumab is best used in the front line rather than in the second line. And these are patients who have PD-L1 high expressing tumors according to the 22C3 antibody CPS greater than equal to one, which is 89% of the patients. So this is an opportunity for almost all patients with first line cervical cancer to add pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab at the discretion of their provider.

Related Videos

Skin Cancer
Immunotherapy

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Resected Melanoma: Biomarkers for and Efficacy of Adjuvant Nivolumab vs Placebo

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, discusses new data showing that patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma who were treated with adjuvant nivolumab had prolonged recurrence-free survival compared with placebo across all biomarker subgroups. The baseline biomarkers most predictive of prolonged recurrence-free survival with nivolumab were high interferon gamma score, high tumor mutational burden, CD8 T-cell infiltration, and low C-reactive protein (Abstract 9504).

Colorectal Cancer

Sebastian Stintzing, MD, on Colorectal Cancer: Influence of Liquid Biopsy in First-Line Combination Treatment

Sebastian Stintzing, MD, of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, discusses results from the phase III FIRE-4 study, which showed that liquid biopsy is clinically relevant in verifying mutational status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and is efficacious in first-line treatment of FOLFIRI and cetuximab for patients with RAS wild-type disease (Abstract 3507).

Lung Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Narjust Florez, MD, and Ferdinandos Skoulidis, MD, PhD, on NSCLC: Findings on Sotorasib vs Docetaxel in the CodeBreaK 200 Trial

Narjust Florez, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ferdinandos Skoulidis, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss results of a biomarker subgroup analysis, showing that sotorasib demonstrated consistent clinical benefit vs docetaxel in all molecularly defined subgroups of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although no predictive biomarkers were confirmed, novel hypothesis-generating signals were observed (Abstract 9008).

Leukemia
COVID-19

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, on New Findings on CLL, COVID-19, and Treatment With Obinutuzumab Plus Venetoclax

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results of a phase III study showing that progression-free survival with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab plus venetoclax is not superior to ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab for treatment-naive older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Long-term follow-up will determine whether there are advantages to obinutuzumab plus venetoclax, with special attention to measurable residual disease and therapy discontinuation (Abstract 7500).

Gynecologic Cancers

Marie Plante, MD, on Cervical Cancer: New Data on Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection

Marie Plante, MD, of Canada’s Université Laval and the CHUQ Hotel Dieu de Québec, discusses phase III results from a study that compared radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection vs simple hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. The pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years in the women who underwent simple hysterectomy is not inferior to those who had radical hysterectomy. In addition, fewer surgical complications and better quality of life were observed with simple hysterectomy (LBA5511).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement