Advertisement


Bradley J. Monk, MD, on Cervical Cancer: Findings on Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Bradley J. Monk, MD, of the University of Arizona, Phoenix, and Creighton University, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-826 study of overall survival results in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Study participants received first-line treatment of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, which reduced the risk of death by up to 40% in three different subsets of patients (Abstract 5500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'd like to share with you my perspective about the treatment of women with recurrent metastatic or persistent cervical cancer. This is a group of patients that we call as the first line treatment. Now, this is a very serious problem. This is the number four cause of cancer death worldwide, and in this country, it causes more than 4,000 deaths. So historically, the treatment has been doublet chemotherapy, platinum, and taxane. And then in 2014, we added bevacizumab to it with a small improvement in overall survival of only three to four months. And here we've sat, since 2014, chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Now, immune therapy is everywhere. It got a very limited conditional approval in the second line in 2018, but we wanted to move it to the first line with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab. So on behalf of the 151 sites in 19 countries, I'd like to share with you the results of Keynote 826, which randomized 617 patients one-to-one, chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, to pembrolizumab or placebo. And that trial led to FDA approval in October 2021, but it was an interim result. It was very preliminary, and now I'd like to share with you the final result. And the final result is that when pembrolizumab is added to chemotherapy versus placebo, there was a 40% improvement in overall survival. What does that mean? That means they live a year longer. A terminal disease that now, average age of 50, live a year longer. And we might even be curing some patients. It's too early to tell. But this is a two-year treatment, six doses of chemotherapy, and then two years of total immune therapy. And then at three years, a third of the patients are now without progression and a year without treatment. There is a plateau, 30% of the patients or so. So this is a major step forward. This confirms two things. Number one, that the preliminary result is real with a year improvement overall survival. And second, that pembrolizumab is best used in the front line rather than in the second line. And these are patients who have PD-L1 high expressing tumors according to the 22C3 antibody CPS greater than equal to one, which is 89% of the patients. So this is an opportunity for almost all patients with first line cervical cancer to add pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab at the discretion of their provider.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer

James Chih-Hsin Yang, MD, PhD, on Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Evaluating Pemetrexed and Platinum With or Without Pembrolizumab

James Chih-Hsin Yang, MD, PhD, of the National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, discusses the latest data from the phase III KEYNOTE-789 study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) with or without pembrolizumab in the treatment of adults with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor–resistant, EGFR–mutated, metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA9000).

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, on Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Standard Treatment

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South and the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, discuss phase III results from the Scandinavian NeoCol trial, which showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in terms of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colon cancer, although there are certain circumstances when this approach may have more favorable outcomes (Abstract LBA3503).

CNS Cancers

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, on Glioma: Phase III Results on Vorasidenib

Lisa M. DeAngelis, MD, and Ingo K. Mellinghoff, MD, both of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss findings from the INDIGO trial showing that the IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib improves progression-free survival for patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation. These data demonstrate the clinical benefit of vorasidenib in this patient population for whom chemotherapy and radiotherapy are being delayed.

Skin Cancer
Immunotherapy

Jason J. Luke, MD, on Melanoma Adjuvant Therapy: Final Analysis of KEYNOTE-716

Jason J. Luke, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, discusses adjuvant pembrolizumab, which, in previous results, improved distant metastasis– and recurrence-free survival in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma vs placebo. After a median follow-up of 39.4 months, adjuvant pembrolizumab continued to show a benefit over placebo, with no new safety signals (Abstract LBA9505).

Colorectal Cancer

Thierry Conroy, MD, on Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results on mFOLFIRINOX vs Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

Thierry Conroy, MD, of the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, discusses phase III findings from the PRODIGE 23 trial, showing that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy improved all outcomes, including overall survival, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer compared with standard chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (Abstract LBA3504).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement