Advertisement


Timothy J. Whelan, MD: When Can Radiotherapy Be Avoided After Breast-Conserving Surgery?

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Timothy J. Whelan, MD, of McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, discusses findings from the LUMINA study, which found that women aged 55 or older who had grade 1–2 T1N0 luminal A breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery and were treated with endocrine therapy alone had very low rates of local tumor recurrence at 5 years. These patients, the research suggests, may be able to forgo radiotherapy (Abstract LBA501).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Women with breast cancer, early stage breast cancer, are primarily treated with lumpectomy, often endocrine therapy and radiation. And for many years now we've realized that the risk of local recurrence after lumpectomy has been steadily decreasing, and this has been attributed to smaller screen detected cancers, better surgical therapies and better systemic therapy. And radiation itself is associated with significant side effects, both early, such as fatigue and skin irritation, and late side effects such as breast distortion, which can affect cosmesis and quality of life. And rare life threatening side effects such as cardiac disease and second cancers. The question is arisen, can we avoid radiotherapy in women who are already going to have lumpectomy and endocrine therapy? We've done a number of studies which have evaluated clinical pathological factors alone, but haven't been able to identify a very low risk group of patients after lumpectomy and endocrine therapy alone. But over the last two decades, we realized a better understanding of the molecular biology of breast cancer and have identified four major intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. Luminal A being the most common subtype and also the lowest risk subtype. The objective of our study was to determine women with clinical pathological factors, low risk and the Luminal A subtype who were treated with lumpectomy and endocrine therapy alone. Could they avoid radiotherapy? The Luminal was a prospective cohort study where we followed 500 women who had low clinical risk factors and Luminal A subtype determined by ER, PR, HER2 and a low Ki-67, less than 13.25%, which was measured centrally in three labs using the international working group methods. And we found over five years that women had a very low rate of local recurrence, only 2.3% with the upper border of the 90% confidence interval being 3.8%, which was well below the 5% limit that we had set for ourselves. We believe that this rate is very low and constitutes that we could omit radiotherapy in this low risk subtype. Should point out that the risk of contralateral breast cancer in this group of women was only 1.8%. Very similar to the risk of local recurrence and the risk of any recurrence was only 2.7%. Again, a low risk group of patients. Based on these results in women who meet the clinical criteria for the study, and I'll mention again, they were women less than or equal to 50 or greater than or equal to 55 years of age who had a T1 N0 cancer, grades 1 and 2, and the luminal A subtype as we determined who were treated with endocrine therapy, they can avoid radiotherapy. Now, although Luminal A is a common subtype, we estimate that this group of women probably constitutes about 10 to 15% of all women with breast cancer. Given that the risk of invasive breast cancer is about 300,000 annually per year in North America, we estimate that this would relate to about 30 to 40,000 women per year.

Related Videos

Hepatobiliary Cancer
Immunotherapy

Akihiro Ohba, MD, on Biliary Tract Cancer: New Findings on Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-nxki

Akihiro Ohba, MD, of Japan’s National Cancer Center Hospital, discusses phase II data from the HERB trial on fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki, which showed activity in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (Abstract 4006).

Breast Cancer
Immunotherapy

Erika Hamilton, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Safety Follow-up Data on T-DXd vs T-DM1

Erika Hamilton, MD, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, discusses phase III data from the DESTINY-Breast03 study, which reinforced the consistent safety profile of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) vs ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer. The findings also support T-DXd’s risk benefit over that of T-DM1 (Abstract 1000).

Leukemia

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, on AML: New Data on IDH2-Mutant Alleles, Enasidenib, and Conventional Care

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discuss phase III findings from the IDHENTIFY trial, which showed that mutational burden and co-mutational profiles differed between patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia that exhibited IDH2-R140 and IDH2-R172 mutations. Enasidenib improved survival outcomes for patients with IDH2-R172 mutations: median overall survival and 1-year survival rates were approximately double those in the conventional care arm (Abstract 7005).

Gynecologic Cancers
Immunotherapy

Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, and Ignace Vergote, MD, PhD, on Cervical Cancer: Interim Results on Tisotumab Vedotin-tftv Plus Pembrolizumab

Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ignace Vergote, MD, PhD, of Belgium’s University Hospitals Leuven, discuss interim safety and efficacy results from a third dose-expansion cohort evaluating first-line tisotumab vedotin-tftv plus pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Data on the combination showed durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile (Abstract 5507).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, on Prostate Cancer: New Data on Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) vs Cabazitaxel

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, discuss follow-up results on LuPSMA vs cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment. The findings suggest that LuPSMA is a suitable option for this population, with fewer adverse events, higher response rates, improved patient-reported outcomes, and similar overall survival compared with cabazitaxel (Abstract 5000).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement