Advertisement


Tara B. Sanft, MD, on How Diet and Exercise May Affect Completion of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Tara B. Sanft, MD, of Yale University, discusses the results of the LEANer study (Lifestyle, Exercise, and Nutrition Early After Diagnosis) in women with breast cancer. It showed that patients with newly diagnosed disease who were just starting chemotherapy could improve physical activity and diet quality. While both groups had high rates of treatment completion, women in the intervention who exercised at or above the recommended levels did better in terms of treatment completion, with fewer dose reductions and delays (Abstract 12007).

 



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We know completing chemotherapy as prescribed is important for cancer outcomes. We also know that adopting healthy diet and exercise is important, both for cancer prevention and, in certain cancers, can improve cancer-related survival. The healthy diet and exercise guidelines include eating a predominantly plant-based diet and exercising with moderate intensity exercise at least 150 minutes per week, and performing two strength training sessions per week. Our study, the Lifestyle, Exercise, and Nutrition Study, randomized women who were not meeting these guidelines to a healthy diet and exercise intervention based on the Diabetes Prevention Protocol and adapted using the cancer-related guidelines as well versus usual care, which is referral to our survivorship clinic and dieticians and exercise programs at request by the patient. Our primary outcome was looking at the relative dose intensity, or the actual amount of chemotherapy received compared to that which was prescribed. The intervention group received a year-long intervention of 16 sessions administered by a registered dietician who was certified, specialized in oncology, and also had exercise counseling training. The control group were followed at baseline post-chemotherapy. What we found was that both groups completed chemotherapy at very high rates, with both groups approaching about 93% completion rates. This is higher than what we had found in the literature before. We also found that the number of dose delays and reductions were similar between the two groups. When we looked at the intervention group, in particular, and we looked at if they were meeting the actual recommendations, that is 150 minutes per week and a high consumption of fruits and vegetables, we found that women who were able to meet these guidelines or exceeded them, did have higher completion rates compared to those who didn't quite make those guidelines. So in summary, the women who made the highest number of changes or adhered the best did have better relative dose intensity and fewer dose reductions and delays. But when we took the entire intervention group and compared them to usual care, we did not find a statistically significant difference. In summary, both groups completed their chemotherapy as prescribed most of the time, and the intervention group significantly improved both their diet and physical activity during the course of the intervention. Those who were able to adopt the exercise and diet recommendations the best did have significant improvements in their completion rates and fewer dose reductions and delays compared to those who didn't adopt it as well.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer
Immunotherapy

Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr, MD, MBA, and Karen L. Reckamp, MD, on NSCLC: Overall Survival Results With Ramucirumab Plus Pembrolizumab vs Standard of Care

Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr, MD, MBA, of the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami, and Karen L. Reckamp, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discuss phase II findings from substudy S1800A of the Lung-MAP protocol. The data showed that ramucirumab and pembrolizumab improved overall survival compared with the standard of care for patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer who were previously treated with immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy (Abstract 9004).

 

Leukemia

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, on AML: New Data on IDH2-Mutant Alleles, Enasidenib, and Conventional Care

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discuss phase III findings from the IDHENTIFY trial, which showed that mutational burden and co-mutational profiles differed between patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia that exhibited IDH2-R140 and IDH2-R172 mutations. Enasidenib improved survival outcomes for patients with IDH2-R172 mutations: median overall survival and 1-year survival rates were approximately double those in the conventional care arm (Abstract 7005).

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Ruben A. Mesa, MD, on Myelofibrosis: Phase III Results on Momelotinib vs Danazol

Ruben A. Mesa, MD, of Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses new findings from the MOMENTUM study. This trial showed that in symptomatic and anemic patients with myelofibrosis, momelotinib was superior to danazol for symptom and spleen responses, as well as transfusion requirements (Abstract 7002).

Skin Cancer

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: New Data on Pembrolizumab, Dabrafenib, and Trametinib

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, discusses findings from the NeoTrio trial on neoadjuvant pembrolizumab alone, in sequence with, or concurrent with dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with resectable BRAF-mutant stage III melanoma. The study may help clinicians determine the optimal combination of therapy (Abstract 9503).

Leukemia

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, and Jorge E. Cortes, MD, on CML: New Efficacy and Safety Results for Asciminib

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Jorge E. Cortes, MD, of Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, discuss phase III results from the ASCEMBL trial, which showed that after more than 2 years of follow-up, asciminib continued to yield superior efficacy and better safety and tolerability vs bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. These results continue to support the use of this kinase inhibitor as a new CML therapy, says Dr. Cortes, with the potential to transform the standard of care (Abstract 7004).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement