Tara B. Sanft, MD, on How Diet and Exercise May Affect Completion of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
Tara B. Sanft, MD, of Yale University, discusses the results of the LEANer study (Lifestyle, Exercise, and Nutrition Early After Diagnosis) in women with breast cancer. It showed that patients with newly diagnosed disease who were just starting chemotherapy could improve physical activity and diet quality. While both groups had high rates of treatment completion, women in the intervention who exercised at or above the recommended levels did better in terms of treatment completion, with fewer dose reductions and delays (Abstract 12007).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
We know completing chemotherapy as prescribed is important for cancer outcomes. We also know that adopting healthy diet and exercise is important, both for cancer prevention and, in certain cancers, can improve cancer-related survival. The healthy diet and exercise guidelines include eating a predominantly plant-based diet and exercising with moderate intensity exercise at least 150 minutes per week, and performing two strength training sessions per week. Our study, the Lifestyle, Exercise, and Nutrition Study, randomized women who were not meeting these guidelines to a healthy diet and exercise intervention based on the Diabetes Prevention Protocol and adapted using the cancer-related guidelines as well versus usual care, which is referral to our survivorship clinic and dieticians and exercise programs at request by the patient. Our primary outcome was looking at the relative dose intensity, or the actual amount of chemotherapy received compared to that which was prescribed. The intervention group received a year-long intervention of 16 sessions administered by a registered dietician who was certified, specialized in oncology, and also had exercise counseling training. The control group were followed at baseline post-chemotherapy. What we found was that both groups completed chemotherapy at very high rates, with both groups approaching about 93% completion rates. This is higher than what we had found in the literature before. We also found that the number of dose delays and reductions were similar between the two groups. When we looked at the intervention group, in particular, and we looked at if they were meeting the actual recommendations, that is 150 minutes per week and a high consumption of fruits and vegetables, we found that women who were able to meet these guidelines or exceeded them, did have higher completion rates compared to those who didn't quite make those guidelines. So in summary, the women who made the highest number of changes or adhered the best did have better relative dose intensity and fewer dose reductions and delays. But when we took the entire intervention group and compared them to usual care, we did not find a statistically significant difference. In summary, both groups completed their chemotherapy as prescribed most of the time, and the intervention group significantly improved both their diet and physical activity during the course of the intervention. Those who were able to adopt the exercise and diet recommendations the best did have significant improvements in their completion rates and fewer dose reductions and delays compared to those who didn't adopt it as well.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Shanu Modi, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss the phase III findings from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, which compared fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer. T-DXd is the first HER2-targeted therapy to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free and overall survival compared with TPC in this patient population, regardless of hormone receptor or immunohistochemistry status or prior use of CDK4/6 inhibitors (Abstract LBA3).
The ASCO Post Staff
Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, discuss follow-up results on LuPSMA vs cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment. The findings suggest that LuPSMA is a suitable option for this population, with fewer adverse events, higher response rates, improved patient-reported outcomes, and similar overall survival compared with cabazitaxel (Abstract 5000).
Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Hope S. Rugo, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, discuss phase III results from the TROPiCS-02 trial. This study showed that sacituzumab govitecan-hziy was more beneficial than single-agent chemotherapy in terms of progression-free survival in heavily pretreated patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative and unresectable advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).
The ASCO Post Staff
Erika Hamilton, MD, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, discusses phase III data from the DESTINY-Breast03 study, which reinforced the consistent safety profile of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) vs ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer. The findings also support T-DXd’s risk benefit over that of T-DM1 (Abstract 1000).
The ASCO Post Staff
Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ian D. Davis, PhD, MBBS, of Monash University and Eastern Health, discuss the latest findings from ANZUP Cancer Trials Group’s ENZAMET cooperative group trial of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The results corroborate the benefit of enzalutamide with improved overall survival, and involve some exploratory subgroup analyses (Abstract LBA5004).