Advertisement


Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, on Melanoma: Distant Metastasis–Free Survival With Adjuvant Pembrolizumab

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Georgina V. Long, MD, PhD, of the Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-716 study. The trial showed that compared with placebo, adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved distant metastasis–free survival in patients with resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma. The findings also suggest a continued reduction in the risk of recurrence and a favorable benefit-risk profile (Abstract LBA9500).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Keynote 716 is a phase three randomized trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage 2B and 2C melanoma. Historically from retrospective studies, stage 2B and C melanoma has been thought to be not as high risk as it actually is. In fact, many patients recur at 24 months and beyond, and these patients have very poor outcomes. So I'm reporting the distant metastasis free survival from this trial. We've previously reported on the relapse free survival on two previous analyses. And what we see is pembrolizumab significantly improves the distant metastasis free survival compared with placebo with a hazard ratio of 0.64, this represents a 36% reduction in the risk of recurrence, and a P value of 0.0029. This is highly significant. We also see on the 24 month and the 12 month landmark distant metastasis free survival rates, a significant increase compared with placebo of pembrolizumab. What's more in this study when we look at the subgroups, key subgroups, every subgroup favors pembrolizumab compared with placebo for the distant metastasis free survival, including the T subcategories 3B, 4A and 4B, as well as the US geographical region. We also see a sustained improvement in the relapse free survival. So at this analysis, this is the third analysis for the relapse free survival. It was the first for distant metastasis free survival. We see a hazard ratio of 0.64 and continued separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves for the relapse-free survival, meaning that adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly decreases the risk of recurrence for patients with resected stage 2B and 2C melanoma. So what are the next steps? The next steps are that we will continue to follow up with this trial and look at the overall survival benefit. In the design of this trial, we had crossover at recurrence. So patients were initially randomized to placebo versus pembrolizumab. But if they recurred, they were unblinded. If they were on the placebo arm or on the pembrolizumab arm, and they had their last dose of pembrolizumab six months or further prior, they were eligible to cross over to pembrolizumab. So we'll also be watching for the overall survival in the coming years. The take home message is that adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improves both the relapse free survival and the distant metastasis free survival, and should be considered for patients with resected stage 2B and 2C melanoma.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, and Michael L. Wang, MD, on Mantle Cell Lymphoma: New Data on Ibrutinib in Combination With Bendamustine/Rituximab and Rituximab Maintenance

Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Michael L. Wang, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discuss primary results from the phase III SHINE study, which showed that ibrutinib, in combination with bendamustine/rituximab and rituximab maintenance, may set a new benchmark for patients aged 65 or older with mantle cell lymphoma. With a median progression-free survival of 6.7 years, the ibrutinib combination is more beneficial than currently used chemoimmunotherapy (approximately 1.5–3.5 years) (Abstract LBA7502).

Issues in Oncology
Global Cancer Care

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, and Karen E. Knudsen, PhD, MBA, on How ASCO and the American Cancer Society Are Collaborating to Help Patients With Cancer

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Karen E. Knudsen, PhD, MBA, of the American Cancer Society, discuss their collaboration, pooling their research and education resources to help empower patients with cancer and their families. Within 48 hours, Drs. Hudis and Knudsen were able to gear up a rapid response to the crisis in Ukraine, forming a clinical corps of volunteers to post information online in multiple languages, which helped patients navigate their care in the war-torn region. To date, 300 European cancer organizations have joined their efforts.

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, on Prostate Cancer: New Data on Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) vs Cabazitaxel

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Michael S. Hofman, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, discuss follow-up results on LuPSMA vs cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment. The findings suggest that LuPSMA is a suitable option for this population, with fewer adverse events, higher response rates, improved patient-reported outcomes, and similar overall survival compared with cabazitaxel (Abstract 5000).

Leukemia

Eunice S. Wang, MD, on AML: Long-Term Results With Crenolanib Plus Chemotherapy

Eunice S. Wang, MD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses long-term phase II findings of a trial evaluating crenolanib plus chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adults with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. The study showed a composite complete remission rate of 86%. With a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival has not been reached. A phase III trial is ongoing (Abstract 7007).

COVID-19

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, on Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among U.S. Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jenny S. Guadamuz, PhD, of Flatiron Health, discusses the use of telemedicine services in community oncology clinics for patients initiating treatments for 21 common cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Black, uninsured, non-urban, and less affluent patients were less likely to use telemedicine services. Although telemedicine may expand access to specialty care, the proliferation of these services may widen cancer care disparities if equitable access to these services is not ensured, according to Dr. Guadamuz (Abstract 6511).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement