Advertisement


Akihiro Ohba, MD, on Biliary Tract Cancer: New Findings on Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-nxki

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Akihiro Ohba, MD, of Japan’s National Cancer Center Hospital, discusses phase II data from the HERB trial on fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki, which showed activity in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (Abstract 4006).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The HERB trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm Phase II trial which evaluate the efficacy and the safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan, T-DXd, in patient with HER2-expressing biliary tract cancers. In 2016, when we began to design this study, there were no effective second-line chemotherapy regiments and no effective targeted therapies for biliary tract cancers. Moreover, even breast and gastric cancers, T-DXd did not have strong evidence, but the early efficacy signs of T-DXd in breast cancer and the HER2-positive rate in biliary tract cancer made us decide to conduct this trial. Before we ran the trial, we examined the tissue sample of more than 400 biliary tract cancer cases by HER2 testing and found that HER2 expression patterns were more similar to gastric cancer than breast cancer. We used the diagnostic criterion for this trial. Patient was screened in 30 Japanese centers taking part in the SCRUM-Japan project and the trial was conducted in five of these 30 centers. A key inclusion criteria was histologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer, centrally confirmed HER2-expressing status and refractory or intolerant to treatment, including gemcitabine. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate in HER2-positive patient by blinded independent central review, BICR. During my year, we enrolled 32 patient, 24 HER2-positive, and eight were HER2-low-expressing. Two ineligible patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Of the 22 HER2-positive eligible patients, the primary endpoint of the confirmed objective response rate was 36.4%. Among the eight HER2-low-expressing patients, one patient achieved a partial response. The duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival, was longer than we expected. In terms of adverse events, the most common adverse events were hematological toxicities such as anemia and neutrophil count decreased and white blood cell count decreased. They were more frequent than in clinical trials of T-DXd in other cancer types. Interstitial lung disease occurred in 25% of patient, including two grade-five cases. Also, we could not find obvious risk factors. We should pay attention to all this when we're using this drug, especially for biliary tract cancers. We think that T-DXd showed promising activity in HER2-expressing biliary tract cancers. Further evaluations are needed to confirm these findings in this patient population. On the other hand, such a large-scale trial is difficult for a limited population of HER2-positive biliary tract cancers, and we also discussed the way of drug approval based on the result of this study. I hope that such an effective drug will be available in our clinical practice.

Related Videos

Pancreatic Cancer

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, on Pancreatic Cancer: Nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, and FOLFOX for Metastatic Disease

Alfredo Carrato, MD, PhD, of Alcala de Henares University in Spain, discusses phase II results from the SEQUENCE trial, which showed that nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and modified FOLFOX showed significantly higher clinical activity than the standard nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the first-line setting of patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Abstract 4022).

Gynecologic Cancers

Bradley J. Monk, MD, on Ovarian Cancer: New Data on Rucaparib Monotherapy vs Placebo as Maintenance Treatment

Bradley J. Monk, MD, of the University of Arizona College of Medicine and Creighton University School of Medicine, discusses phase III findings from the ATHENA–MONO (GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45) trial. It showed that rucaparib as first-line maintenance treatment, following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, improved progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer, irrespective of homologous recombination deficiency status (Abstract LBA5500).

Head and Neck Cancer

Sue S. Yom, MD, PhD, on Oropharyngeal Cancer and the Feasibility of a Cell-Free DNA Plasma Assay

Sue S. Yom, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses a translational analysis from the NRG-HN002 study. This phase II trial established the feasibility of the tumor tissue–modified viral (TTMV) human papillomavirus DNA assay in clinical trial specimens. The goal is to use such an assay to measure tumor volume, levels of TTMV over the course of treatment, and the association of TTMV to treatment outcomes (Abstract 6006).

 

Michael J. Overman, MD, and Takayuki Yoshino, PhD, MD, on Colorectal Cancer: Phase III Data on Panitumumab or Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6

Michael J. Overman, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Takayuki Yoshino, PhD, MD, of the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan, discuss results from the PARADIGM trial, the first prospective study to test the superiority of panitumumab vs bevacizumab in combination with standard doublet first-line chemotherapy for patients with RAS wild-type and left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer. The study showed that panitumumab improved overall survival in combination with mFOLFOX6, which may establish a standard first-line combination regimen for this population (Abstract LBA1).

Prostate Cancer
Genomics/Genetics

Neal D. Shore, MD, on Germline Genetic Testing and Its Impact on Prostate Cancer Clinical Decision-Making

Neal D. Shore, MD, of the Carolina Urologic Research Center, discusses his study findings, showing that germline genetic testing influenced care for patients with prostate cancer. Men whose genetic test was positive for a pathogenic germline variant received more recommendations for changes to follow-up and treatment, and for testing and counseling of relatives, than did patients with negative or uncertain test results (Abstract 10500).

 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement