Advertisement


Akihiro Ohba, MD, on Biliary Tract Cancer: New Findings on Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan-nxki

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Akihiro Ohba, MD, of Japan’s National Cancer Center Hospital, discusses phase II data from the HERB trial on fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki, which showed activity in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (Abstract 4006).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The HERB trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm Phase II trial which evaluate the efficacy and the safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan, T-DXd, in patient with HER2-expressing biliary tract cancers. In 2016, when we began to design this study, there were no effective second-line chemotherapy regiments and no effective targeted therapies for biliary tract cancers. Moreover, even breast and gastric cancers, T-DXd did not have strong evidence, but the early efficacy signs of T-DXd in breast cancer and the HER2-positive rate in biliary tract cancer made us decide to conduct this trial. Before we ran the trial, we examined the tissue sample of more than 400 biliary tract cancer cases by HER2 testing and found that HER2 expression patterns were more similar to gastric cancer than breast cancer. We used the diagnostic criterion for this trial. Patient was screened in 30 Japanese centers taking part in the SCRUM-Japan project and the trial was conducted in five of these 30 centers. A key inclusion criteria was histologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer, centrally confirmed HER2-expressing status and refractory or intolerant to treatment, including gemcitabine. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate in HER2-positive patient by blinded independent central review, BICR. During my year, we enrolled 32 patient, 24 HER2-positive, and eight were HER2-low-expressing. Two ineligible patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Of the 22 HER2-positive eligible patients, the primary endpoint of the confirmed objective response rate was 36.4%. Among the eight HER2-low-expressing patients, one patient achieved a partial response. The duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival, was longer than we expected. In terms of adverse events, the most common adverse events were hematological toxicities such as anemia and neutrophil count decreased and white blood cell count decreased. They were more frequent than in clinical trials of T-DXd in other cancer types. Interstitial lung disease occurred in 25% of patient, including two grade-five cases. Also, we could not find obvious risk factors. We should pay attention to all this when we're using this drug, especially for biliary tract cancers. We think that T-DXd showed promising activity in HER2-expressing biliary tract cancers. Further evaluations are needed to confirm these findings in this patient population. On the other hand, such a large-scale trial is difficult for a limited population of HER2-positive biliary tract cancers, and we also discussed the way of drug approval based on the result of this study. I hope that such an effective drug will be available in our clinical practice.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer
Immunotherapy

Erika Hamilton, MD, on Metastatic Breast Cancer: Safety Follow-up Data on T-DXd vs T-DM1

Erika Hamilton, MD, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, discusses phase III data from the DESTINY-Breast03 study, which reinforced the consistent safety profile of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) vs ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer. The findings also support T-DXd’s risk benefit over that of T-DM1 (Abstract 1000).

Bladder Cancer

Shilpa Gupta, MD, on Urothelial Cancer: Defining Who Is 'Platinum-Ineligible'

Shilpa Gupta, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, discusses an updated consensus definition for standard therapy and clinical trial eligibility for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who are platinum-ineligible, criteria that are proposed to guide treatment recommendations for this population. This may be especially important now that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has restricted the use of first-line pembrolizumab to those who are considered platinum-ineligible (Abstract 4577).

Prostate Cancer

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, and Ian D. Davis, PhD, MBBS, on Prostate Cancer: Updated Overall Survival Outcomes With Enzalutamide

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Ian D. Davis, PhD, MBBS, of Monash University and Eastern Health, discuss the latest findings from ANZUP Cancer Trials Group’s ENZAMET cooperative group trial of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The results corroborate the benefit of enzalutamide with improved overall survival, and involve some exploratory subgroup analyses (Abstract LBA5004).

Leukemia

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, on AML: New Data on IDH2-Mutant Alleles, Enasidenib, and Conventional Care

Courtney D. DiNardo, MD, MSCE, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Stéphane de Botton, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, discuss phase III findings from the IDHENTIFY trial, which showed that mutational burden and co-mutational profiles differed between patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia that exhibited IDH2-R140 and IDH2-R172 mutations. Enasidenib improved survival outcomes for patients with IDH2-R172 mutations: median overall survival and 1-year survival rates were approximately double those in the conventional care arm (Abstract 7005).

Lung Cancer

Apar Kishor Ganti, MD, on SCLC: Comparing Quality of Life With Once- and Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy

Apar Kishor Ganti, MD, of the University of Nebraska Medical Center, discusses results from the CALGB 30610 study, which showed a similar clinical benefit for once- and twice-daily radiotherapy administered to patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. While both regimens were well tolerated, patients who received radiotherapy once daily had better quality-of-life scores at week 3 and slightly worse scores at week 12. Patients believed the once-daily regimen was more convenient (Abstract 8504).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement