Advertisement


Natalie Wuliji, DO, and Mohamed Sorror, MD, MSc, on the Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Access to and Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multi-Center Observational Study

2024 ASH Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Natalie Wuliji, DO, and Mohamed Sorror, MD, MSc, of Fred Hutch Cancer Center and the University of Washington School of Medicine, presented results of a prospective, multicenter observational study across 13 predominantly academic centers enrolling adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The research aimed to evaluate the potential impact of socioeconomic disparities on receipt of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients as well as survival outcomes (Abstract 6).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Dr. Sorror: Hello everyone. My name is Mohamed Sorror, I'm a professor at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. And I have with me today Dr. Natalie Wuliji, who is an assistant professor at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. And we both are today summarizing the results of a study that was presented at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting, looking at the socioeconomic factors and their impact on the outcomes and access to allogeneic transplant for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Dr. Wuliji: Mohamed, what if you could tell me a little bit about what was the inspiration for the study? Dr. Sorror: Well, the main inspiration for this study is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a complex and costly procedure, and we know it is potentially curative for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia. But we also know that many patients who get diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia are older patients. And we wanted to understand how much social and economic factors might impact the outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. And the ability to receive allogeneic transplant and the outcomes after receiving allogeneic transplant. We wanted to understand how these factors are impacting these outcomes, are there any barriers that we need to take into account in the future. Dr. Wuliji: Thank you. Dr. Sorror: So then let me ask you if you can give us a little bit details about the design of the study. Dr. Wuliji: So this was a prospective study longitudinal across 13 US AML treatment centers in the United States. We enrolled patients between ages 18 and 80 who were treated with AML or AML-like therapy. They had either newly diagnosed AML or less refractable disease or higher risk MDS. They needed to have received curative intent therapy. And so what we wanted to look at is how social determinants of health impacted not only the receipt of allogeneic transplant, but also survival outcomes such as mortality without transplant, as well as post-transplant mortality. And so what we found was, as we expected, socioeconomic factors or social determinants of health do impact access to allogeneic transplant as well as mortality before transplant. So patients are more likely to die if they come from what we call high-risk social factors, such as reliance on government assistance programs or from neighborhoods with high proportions of patients with less than high school education. However, what was surprising to us was the fact that once patients receive transplant, the socioeconomic factors or barriers appear to have less effect. This finding actually makes us think that once patients are able to receive transplant, the socioeconomic barriers are much less important. Dr. Sorror: And can you tell me, because many studies have looked at these factors before, why you think this study is unique? Dr. Wuliji: Absolutely. So first of all, this was a prospective study. We examined social determinants of health in detail, so we looked at four key social determinants of health domains that reflected both general risks as well as specific social risks. But also we had a very comprehensive adjustments. We adjusted for patient specific factors, disease specific factors. We adjusted for quality of life infra to measures to truly isolate the impact of social determinants of health on the outcomes. Mohamed, I was wondering if you could tell me a little bit more about what should be the future steps to address the findings. Dr. Sorror: There are different steps that we would like to investigate in the future. One of them actually started, which would be creating material slides and videos prepared by prior patients to speak to future patients from the same background and try to enhance them to trust the system and enroll in trials for allogeneic transplant in the future. Also, we would like to test and research studies some interventions like for example, giving cash money to patients or hiring navigators that can help these patients who come from neighborhoods with a lower education or poverty, how they can manage the system and overcome the barriers to reach transplant centers and be able to receive the procedure. Dr. Wuliji: I think it will be also very important to involve community physicians for acute leukemia in their clinics in our future collaborative efforts.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Matthew S. Davids, MD, MMSc, on Triplet Therapy of Acalabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Obinutuzumab: Focus on TP53-Aberrant CLL

Matthew S. Davids, MD, MMSc, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, discusses the primary endpoint evaluation of a phase II trial of the triplet regimen of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab in a population of patients with TP53-aberrrant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The triplet was active and well tolerated as a front-line therapy, Dr. Davids noted, and these findings support its use for such patients with high-risk CLL (Abstract 1865).

Hematologic Malignancies

John O. Mascarenhas, MD, on Myelofibrosis: Novel Combination of Imetelstat Plus Ruxolitinib

John O. Mascarenhas, MD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses early results from the ongoing phase I/IB IMproveMF trial, which is evaluating the safety and activity of the novel combination of imetelstat and ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis (Abstract 998).  

Lymphoma

Timothy S. Fenske, MD, on Lack of Benefit of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients in First Complete Remission With Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease

Timothy S. Fenske, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin presented an initial report from the ECOG-ACRIN EA4151 phase III randomized trial exploring outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT) in mantle cell lymphoma. The researchers randomized patients in first complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease and found that ASCT was not associated with improved outcomes (Abstract LBA-6).

Hematologic Malignancies
Supportive Care

Nikolaos Katsivelos, MD, and John Levine, MD, MS, on How Serial Clinical and Biomarker Monitoring During Treatment Can Stratify Patients With Low-Risk GVHD

Nikolaos Katsivelos, MD, and John Levine, MD, MS, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai report on an investigation into the potential for serial monitoring of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) symptom severity and MAGIC algorithm probabilities in patients with clinical and biomarker-defined low-risk GVHD to further risk-stratify patients into clinically meaningful groups (Abstract 380).

Leukemia

Anne Sophie Michallet, MD, PhD, on MRD-Guided vs Standard Combination Therapy for Select Untreated Patients With CLL

Anne Sophie Michallet, MD, PhD, of Centre Léon Bérard Hospital, Lyon, France, discusses the final results of the phase II ERADIC trial (Abstract 584), which compared measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax with a standard combination regimen in patients with intermediate-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Dr. Michallet also emphasizes the importance of defining the best patient profile for this MRD-guided combination given its potential for cardiologic toxicity.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement