Advertisement


John O. Mascarenhas, MD, on Myelofibrosis: Novel Combination of Imetelstat Plus Ruxolitinib

2024 ASH Annual Meeting

Advertisement

John O. Mascarenhas, MD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses early results from the ongoing phase I/IB IMproveMF trial, which is evaluating the safety and activity of the novel combination of imetelstat and ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis (Abstract 998).  



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The IMproveMF study is a study of imetelstat, the telomerase inhibitor, the first in class telomerase inhibitor, which is an infusional agent in patients with myelofibrosis that are on a stable dose of ruxolitinib with the add-on metals stat to try to improve upon response, spleen, symptom, and biomarkers of response. So this is a phase one B study dose escalation starting at 4.7 milligrams per kilogram IV every four weeks added onto the stable dose of ruxolitinib. The patients had to been on for at least 12 weeks and a stable dose for four weeks. And what we saw in this phase one B study all the way up to 9.4 milligrams per kilogram was no dose limiting toxicity. So we didn't see significant myelosuppression, GI toxicity, or any other non hematologic toxicity. Any hematologic toxicity we saw was both transient and recoverable, allowing us to continue dosing imetelstat. So it really did prove that imetelstat which is approved, I should say in lower risk transfusion dependent MDS patients with an anemia goal in myelofibrosis can be delivered as an add-on strategy to ruxolitinib safely. We're now beginning to look at the readout of efficacy. We gave some preliminary results showing that at the higher doses of imetelstat 9.4 milligram per kilogram, which is the dose I should point out, that's being evaluated in the phase three randomized. Phase three is a single agent in the relapse refractory setting is a well tolerated dose and has shown already some preliminary activity in terms of reduction in spleen and symptom burden above and beyond what we were seeing with the single agent ruxolitinib initially. So we need to expand this cohort, continue to follow the patients for outcome measures like progression-free survival, maybe even overall survival, and make sure these responses are durable, and that's the next step. We'll also add a cohort of patients that will likely be treatment naive patients, so adding imetelstat plus ruxolitinib upfront rather than this delayed add-on strategy. So more to come with imetelstat. And of course we're still waiting for the randomized phase three single agent in the relapse refractory setting to read out. Hopefully by 2026.

Related Videos

Leukemia

Matthew S. Davids, MD, MMSc, on Triplet Therapy of Acalabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Obinutuzumab: Focus on TP53-Aberrant CLL

Matthew S. Davids, MD, MMSc, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, discusses the primary endpoint evaluation of a phase II trial of the triplet regimen of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab in a population of patients with TP53-aberrrant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The triplet was active and well tolerated as a front-line therapy, Dr. Davids noted, and these findings support its use for such patients with high-risk CLL (Abstract 1865).

Lymphoma

Timothy S. Fenske, MD, on Lack of Benefit of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients in First Complete Remission With Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease

Timothy S. Fenske, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin presented an initial report from the ECOG-ACRIN EA4151 phase III randomized trial exploring outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT) in mantle cell lymphoma. The researchers randomized patients in first complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease and found that ASCT was not associated with improved outcomes (Abstract LBA-6).

Hematologic Malignancies

John O. Mascarenhas, MD, on Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibrosis: Navtemadlin vs Best Available Therapy After JAK Inhibitor Treatment

John O. Mascarenhas, MD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, discusses the results of the phase III BOREAS study evaluating the efficacy and safety of single-agent navtemadlin vs best available therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis who had previously received JAK inhibitor therapy. Navtemadlin is a potent, selective, orally available MDM2 inhibitor that restores p53 function (Abstract 1000).  

Leukemia

Danielle Wolfe Cohen, MD, on Mechanisms of Relapse in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Danielle Wolfe Cohen, MD, of the William L. Carroll Laboratory at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, describes data illuminating the role of an inflammatory phenotype in driving clonal evolution in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The new findings may indicate promising avenues for further research on treatment resistance and disease relapse (Abstract 633).

Leukemia

Anne Sophie Michallet, MD, PhD, on MRD-Guided vs Standard Combination Therapy for Select Untreated Patients With CLL

Anne Sophie Michallet, MD, PhD, of Centre Léon Bérard Hospital, Lyon, France, discusses the final results of the phase II ERADIC trial (Abstract 584), which compared measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax with a standard combination regimen in patients with intermediate-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Dr. Michallet also emphasizes the importance of defining the best patient profile for this MRD-guided combination given its potential for cardiologic toxicity.

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement