Belinda Lee, MBBS, on Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer: New Data on Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Belinda Lee, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Northern Health, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, discusses findings from the AGITG DYNAMIC-Pancreas trial on the potential role of serial circulating tumor DNA testing after upfront surgery to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage disease (Abstract 107).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'm here today to talk to you about the DYNAMIC-Pancreas clinical trial. This was a non-randomized phase 2 study looking at the potential role of circulating tumor DNA testing after upfront surgery to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage pancreatic cancer patients. In this study, we explored the feasibility and clinical utility of tumor-informed ctDNA testing for patients after surgery to see if we could guide their treatment. This study confirmed that the prognostic significance of ctDNA as a biomarker after surgery in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Even when ctDNA is not detected after surgery, there is still a high risk of recurrence that remains. We enrolled 102 patients from 26 Australian cancer centers exploring the feasibility and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA. We looked to ask questions like, can the use of ctDNA inform us about the risk of recurrence in our patients, and can we use ctDNA to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy comparing three versus six months duration of chemotherapy, as well as comparing the use of different intensities of chemotherapy looking at triplet versus doublet chemotherapy in our patients?
What we found was that ctDNA does indeed provide prognostic significance in early-stage pancreatic cancer. However, even in the negative ctDNA cohort, the risk of relapse remains. We would still advise that you give six months of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. While ctDNA-negative indicates as low risk of recurrence, patients should still undergo their adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, and future studies should incorporate the use of ctDNA after treatments from surgery, as well as after adjuvant chemotherapy. Changes in ctDNA may be used to track the changes in the patient's tumor burden throughout their treatment. We could also use ctDNA to integrate ctDNA into new studies looking at novel agents as well.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Lisa A. Carey, MD, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Kevin Kalinsky, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, discuss the first phase III findings showing a benefit of continued CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, following disease progression in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (LBA1001).
The ASCO Post Staff
Clifford A. Hudis, MD, of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), talks about the 2024 Annual Meeting, and a focus on the compassionate side of cancer care.
The ASCO Post Staff
Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, discusses phase III findings showing that high baseline serum KIM-1 levels were associated with poorer prognosis but improved clinical outcomes with atezolizumab vs placebo in patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after resection. Increased post-treatment KIM-1 levels were found to be associated with worse disease-free survival (Abstract 4506).
The ASCO Post Staff
Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Cancer Institute and the University of London, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discuss clinical outcomes of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy after prior exposure to enfortumab vedotin-ejfv in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, as well as the safety and efficacy of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in patients with HER2-expressing bladder tumors (Abstracts 4502 and 4509).
The ASCO Post Staff
Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).