Belinda Lee, MBBS, on Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer: New Data on Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Belinda Lee, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Northern Health, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, discusses findings from the AGITG DYNAMIC-Pancreas trial on the potential role of serial circulating tumor DNA testing after upfront surgery to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage disease (Abstract 107).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'm here today to talk to you about the DYNAMIC-Pancreas clinical trial. This was a non-randomized phase 2 study looking at the potential role of circulating tumor DNA testing after upfront surgery to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage pancreatic cancer patients. In this study, we explored the feasibility and clinical utility of tumor-informed ctDNA testing for patients after surgery to see if we could guide their treatment. This study confirmed that the prognostic significance of ctDNA as a biomarker after surgery in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Even when ctDNA is not detected after surgery, there is still a high risk of recurrence that remains. We enrolled 102 patients from 26 Australian cancer centers exploring the feasibility and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA. We looked to ask questions like, can the use of ctDNA inform us about the risk of recurrence in our patients, and can we use ctDNA to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy comparing three versus six months duration of chemotherapy, as well as comparing the use of different intensities of chemotherapy looking at triplet versus doublet chemotherapy in our patients?
What we found was that ctDNA does indeed provide prognostic significance in early-stage pancreatic cancer. However, even in the negative ctDNA cohort, the risk of relapse remains. We would still advise that you give six months of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. While ctDNA-negative indicates as low risk of recurrence, patients should still undergo their adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, and future studies should incorporate the use of ctDNA after treatments from surgery, as well as after adjuvant chemotherapy. Changes in ctDNA may be used to track the changes in the patient's tumor burden throughout their treatment. We could also use ctDNA to integrate ctDNA into new studies looking at novel agents as well.
Related Videos
The ASCO Post Staff
Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses recent approvals of multiple novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer, weighing their potential benefits and risks, understanding the mechanisms that drive response and resistance, and exploring how to optimally sequence them to enhance survival and quality of life.
The ASCO Post Staff
Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD, of Institut Gustave Roussy and the University of Paris-Saclay, discuss a second interim analysis of the health-related quality of life and pain outcomes in the PSMAfore study (Abstract 5003).
The ASCO Post Staff
Katherine C. Fuh, MD, PhD, of the University of California, San Francisco, discusses phase III findings of the AXLerate-OC trial, showing that batiraxcept with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer whose tumors were AXL-high in an exploratory analysis (LBA5515).
The ASCO Post Staff
Joseph A. Greer, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, discusses study findings showing the merits of delivering early palliative care via telehealth vs in person to patients with advanced lung cancer. Using telemedicine in this way may potentially improve access to and more broadly disseminate this evidence-based care model (LBA3).
The ASCO Post Staff
Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).