Belinda Lee, MBBS, on Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer: New Data on Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
Belinda Lee, MBBS, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Northern Health, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, discusses findings from the AGITG DYNAMIC-Pancreas trial on the potential role of serial circulating tumor DNA testing after upfront surgery to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage disease (Abstract 107).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
I'm here today to talk to you about the DYNAMIC-Pancreas clinical trial. This was a non-randomized phase 2 study looking at the potential role of circulating tumor DNA testing after upfront surgery to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage pancreatic cancer patients. In this study, we explored the feasibility and clinical utility of tumor-informed ctDNA testing for patients after surgery to see if we could guide their treatment. This study confirmed that the prognostic significance of ctDNA as a biomarker after surgery in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Even when ctDNA is not detected after surgery, there is still a high risk of recurrence that remains. We enrolled 102 patients from 26 Australian cancer centers exploring the feasibility and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA. We looked to ask questions like, can the use of ctDNA inform us about the risk of recurrence in our patients, and can we use ctDNA to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy comparing three versus six months duration of chemotherapy, as well as comparing the use of different intensities of chemotherapy looking at triplet versus doublet chemotherapy in our patients?
What we found was that ctDNA does indeed provide prognostic significance in early-stage pancreatic cancer. However, even in the negative ctDNA cohort, the risk of relapse remains. We would still advise that you give six months of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. While ctDNA-negative indicates as low risk of recurrence, patients should still undergo their adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, and future studies should incorporate the use of ctDNA after treatments from surgery, as well as after adjuvant chemotherapy. Changes in ctDNA may be used to track the changes in the patient's tumor burden throughout their treatment. We could also use ctDNA to integrate ctDNA into new studies looking at novel agents as well.
The ASCO Post Staff
Minesh P. Mehta, MD, of Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, discusses results from the METIS (EF-25) trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields therapy following stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with mutation-negative non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. Tumor treating fields therapy prolongs time to intracranial disease progression and may postpone whole-brain radiation therapy without declines in quality of life and cognition (Abstract 2008).
The ASCO Post Staff
Lisa A. Carey, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Dejan Juric, MD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, discuss phase III findings on first-line use of inavolisib or placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who relapsed within 12 months of completing adjuvant endocrine therapy (Abstract 1003).
The ASCO Post Staff
Brian I. Rini, MD, of Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings of the KEYNOTE-426 study of pembrolizumab plus axitinib vs sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. He details the exploratory biomarker results, including RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and PD-L1 (Abstract 4505).
The ASCO Post Staff
Ana C. Garrido-Castro, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses recent approvals of multiple novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer, weighing their potential benefits and risks, understanding the mechanisms that drive response and resistance, and exploring how to optimally sequence them to enhance survival and quality of life.
The ASCO Post Staff
Pauline Funchain, MD, of Stanford University, and Caroline Robert, MD, PhD, of Gustave Roussy, discuss phase II findings showing that combining encorafenib and binimetinib followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab vs ipilimumab and nivolumab can improve progression-free survival in patients with BRAF-V600E/K-mutated melanoma characterized by high lactate dehydrogenase and liver metastases (Abstract LBA9503).