Advertisement


Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, on Urothelial Cancer: Phase II Trial Analysis of Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in Metastatic Disease

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Advertisement

Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, of the Yale Cancer Center, discusses a primary phase II analysis of the TROPHY-U-01 study, cohort 2, which evaluated sacituzumab govitecan-hziy in platinum-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial cancer that progressed after prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. (Abstract 520).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved over the past 10 years and really has come a long way. Around 2010, if a patient had metastatic bladder cancer, there were two options for platinum eligible patients, those included the MVAC chemotherapy regimen as well as gemcitabine and cisplatinum. Carboplatinum and gemcitabine was considered a standard of care for those patients who were not eligible to receive cisplatin based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, once a patient progressed after any of these regimens, the median survival was about six months. With the use of checkpoint inhibition therapy, as well as the ADCs or the antibody drug conjugates that are showing significant activity in urothelial carcinoma, we've been able to treat patients that have been otherwise refractory to treatment. So we do need more treatments for the treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma, as well as platinum ineligible urothelial carcinoma. And that was the point of the second group of the TROPHY study. So we took patients who were ineligible to receive cisplatinum and treated those patients with Sacituzumab govitecan. We found that the response rate was 32% in all patients treated. Additionally, we found that in those patients who did not receive either prior chemotherapy or enfortumab vedotin, that the response rate was more than 50%. The toxicities that we observed with this study included neutropenia as well as diarrhea, and these were consistent with what was reported with the first cohort of the TROPHY study. So in summary, Sacituzumab govitecan has activity in platinum ineligible urothelial carcinoma, and further studies are being performed to look at the combination of Sacituzumab with checkpoint inhibition therapy. Additionally, there are studies that are ongoing with Sacituzumab combined with cisplatin in cisplatinum eligible patients. So this drug can form the core for the development of future therapies for refractory, as well as first line urothelial carcinoma.

Related Videos

Prostate Cancer

Alan H. Bryce, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Phase III Results on Rucaparib, Docetaxel, and Androgen Pathway Inhibitor Therapy

Alan H. Bryce, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, discusses the final results of the primary endpoint of rPFS and interim results on overall survival among patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The data showed that rucaparib improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with either docetaxel or abiraterone and enzalutamide in disease with BRCA1/2 alterations. (Abstract 18).

Kidney Cancer

Michael B. Atkins, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Phase II Findings on Nivolumab and Ipilimumab

Michael B. Atkins, MD, of Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses treatment-free survival outcomes from the HCRN GU16-260-Cohort A study of patients with previously untreated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab and salvage nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The regimen appears to result in substantial treatment-free survival with few treatment-related adverse events. (Abstract 604).

Kidney Cancer

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Phase III Results on Cabozantinib, Nivolumab, and Ipilimumab

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, discusses new data from the COSMIC-313 study of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma of IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) intermediate or poor risk. Those who received cabozantinib instead of placebo with nivolumab and ipilimumab as first-line treatment seemed to experience improved progression-free survival. A subgroup analysis suggested the benefit was primarily in patients with an intermediate risk. Follow-up for overall survival is ongoing. (Abstract 605).

Prostate Cancer

Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Latest Data on Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel

Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, of the Yale Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-921 study, which was designed to assess the combination of pembrolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. They had not received chemotherapy, but their disease progressed on the next-generation hormonal agent, or they could not tolerate the agent. (Abstract 19).

Bladder Cancer

Vadim S. Koshkin, MD, and Tanya Jindal, BS, BA, on Urothelial Carcinoma: Biomarkers of Response to Enfortumab Vedotin-ejfv

Vadim S. Koshkin, MD, and Tanya Jindal, BS, BA, both of the University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, discuss results from the retrospective UNITE study of biomarkers of response to the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin-ejfv in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Enfortumab vedotin is used widely in treatment-refractory disease, but there have been limited data available on biomarkers that may predict outcomes with this treatment. The UNITE study has now identified several potential biomarkers that need to be validated to help inform clinical decision-making and therapy sequencing. (Abstract 450).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement