Advertisement


Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, on Prostate Cancer: Latest Data on Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Advertisement

Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, of the Yale Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the KEYNOTE-921 study, which was designed to assess the combination of pembrolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. They had not received chemotherapy, but their disease progressed on the next-generation hormonal agent, or they could not tolerate the agent. (Abstract 19).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The keynote study in metastatic prostate cancer was designed to ask the question as to whether immune therapy improved the survival and their radiographic progression-free survival of patients treated with Docetaxel with castrate resistant prostate cancer. The median survival of patients with Docetaxel is generally about 19 months. However, other studies have demonstrated that when Docetaxel is administered after next generation anti-androgens, the survival is somewhat lower, about 13 months. So, in a phase two trial, it was determined that the median survival of Docetaxel combined with Pembrolizumab was approximately 19 months, and this was the impetus for going fourth with a phase three trial comparing Docetaxel plus Pembrolizumab to the standard of care Docetaxel. In both arms, prednisone was administered at five milligrams BID. Unfortunately, the results of the study demonstrated that there was no improvement in radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival. The implications of this are that, at least from this particular standpoint, immune checkpoint therapy does not change the standard of care for chemotherapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. What we need to do is to move forward and look at the different molecular markers. We've collected tissue as part of this particular trial, it was a requirement to see those patients who've responded to Docetaxel if there is any molecular signature that we can use. We know that Pembrolizumab is FDA approved in those patients who have microsatellite instability with metastatic prostate cancer, but that only represents 2% of the population, and there have been responses observed with Pembrolizumab in those patients who do not have microsatellite instability. We have to understand, of course, what the proper signature is for that. So, the future trials will not be looking at simple checkpoint therapy combined with chemotherapy in this particular setting, but will focus on looking at molecular signatures that may improve the response rates to immune therapy and to chemotherapy, and potentially combine the two of them together.

Related Videos

Bladder Cancer

Andrea Necchi, MD, on Bladder Cancer: Phase II Results With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy

Andrea Necchi, MD, of Italy’s Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, discusses new data from the KEYNOTE-057 trial on a novel systemic therapy for papillary high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The findings suggest that patients whose disease does not respond to bacillus Calmette-Guérin or who declined or were ineligible for a radical cystectomy may benefit from pembrolizumab monotherapy. (Abstract LBA442).

Kidney Cancer

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Potential Predictive Biomarkers of Treatment Efficacy

Toni K. Choueiri, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a biomarker analysis from the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial of nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The ongoing study aims to identify a predictive biomarker that may potentially guide therapeutic choices. (Abstract 608).

Kidney Cancer

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: New Phase II Data on Cabozantinib and Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD, of France’s Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, discusses interim results from the CaboPoint study, which evaluated cabozantinib as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a clear cell component. Disease in the study participants had progressed after prior treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination or combined with VEGF-targeted therapy. (Abstract 606).

Kidney Cancer

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Phase III Results on Cabozantinib, Nivolumab, and Ipilimumab

Thomas Powles, MD, PhD, of Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, discusses new data from the COSMIC-313 study of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma of IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) intermediate or poor risk. Those who received cabozantinib instead of placebo with nivolumab and ipilimumab as first-line treatment seemed to experience improved progression-free survival. A subgroup analysis suggested the benefit was primarily in patients with an intermediate risk. Follow-up for overall survival is ongoing. (Abstract 605).

Prostate Cancer

Neeraj Agarwal, MD, on Prostate Cancer: New Data on Talazoparib and Enzalutamide

Neeraj Agarwal, MD, of the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, discusses phase III results from the TALAPRO-2 study, which suggested an improvement in radiographic progression-free survival with the combination of talazoparib and enzalutamide over standard-of-care enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The improvement was seen regardless of homologous recombination repair gene mutations. The combination regimen delayed the time to chemotherapy and worsening in global health status and quality of life. (Abstract LBA17).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement