Advertisement


James Chih-Hsin Yang, MD, PhD, on Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Evaluating Pemetrexed and Platinum With or Without Pembrolizumab

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

James Chih-Hsin Yang, MD, PhD, of the National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, discusses the latest data from the phase III KEYNOTE-789 study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) with or without pembrolizumab in the treatment of adults with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor–resistant, EGFR–mutated, metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA9000).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
James Chih-Hsin Yang: Patients who had EGFR mutation, stage four non-small cell lung cancer, the standard of care is tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a first line. When they fail, they have to receive chemotherapy as a standard of care. KEYNOTE-789 is a randomized phase three study, testing whether adding pembrolizumab to the standard chemotherapy is going to help overall survival and progression-free survival. 492 patients who are randomized into two arms. One, pembrolizumab plus end of care chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus placebo. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. There were three interim analysis. Progression-free survival time were done at the interim analysis two. The hazard ratio was 0.8, which nearly touched the statistical significant P value of boundary 0.0117 and therefore miss the endpoint. The overall survival endpoint was done at the interim analysis three, which was then final analysis 42 months after the last patient's randomized. The overall survival hazard ratio was 0.84, was also statistically not significant. We also look at the pathological and clinical factors. We try to figure out whether patients with different characteristics can benefit from pembrolizumab adding to chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there was only one factor that seems to help these patients, which is PD-L1 status. Patients who had PD-L1 more than 1%, which is close to 50% of the population, the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.77. Where those patients who did not have PD-L1 expression, their hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.91. So, we had a study that we cannot change the standard practice, yet the finding that PD-L1 status may help us to choose a patient when asked for future study.

Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer

Thierry Conroy, MD, on Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results on mFOLFIRINOX vs Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

Thierry Conroy, MD, of the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, discusses phase III findings from the PRODIGE 23 trial, showing that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy improved all outcomes, including overall survival, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer compared with standard chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (Abstract LBA3504).

Bladder Cancer

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: New Data on Erdafitinib vs Chemotherapy From the THOR Study

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings showing that for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alteration who already had been treated with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor, erdafitinib significantly improved overall and progression-free survival, as well as overall response rate, compared with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (LBA4619).

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Lymphoma

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, on Primary Refractory and Early Relapsing DLBCL: Therapeutic Options

Manali K. Kamdar, MD, of University of Colorado Hospital, discusses the treatment landscape for the 30% to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease will relapse. Patients who experience relapse within 1 year of chemoimmunotherapy have poor outcomes with autotransplantation, but chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has shown efficacy and manageable toxicity.

Lymphoma

Jennifer L. Crombie, MD, on DLBCL: Real-World Outcomes With Novel Therapies in Relapsed or Refractory Disease

Jennifer L. Crombie, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses the historically poor outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Her study examined real-world data on the use of novel therapies in this population and found that outcomes with second- and third-line regimens of polatuzumab vedotin-piiq plus bendamustine and rituximab and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide remain suboptimal, with worse outcomes particularly after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (Abstract 7552).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement