Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, on Updated Survival Results on T-DXd vs T-DM1 in Metastatic Breast Cancer
2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses phase III findings from the DESTINY-Breast03 study, which showed that second-line treatment with fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd) led to longer overall survival compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients treated with T-DXd had a 36% lower risk of death than those treated with T-DM1 (Abstract GS2-02).
Transcript
Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
DESTINY-Breast 03 was a phase 3 randomized clinical trial looking at T-DXd versus T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after trastuzumab and a taxane.
The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. And a key secondary endpoint was overall survival. The data were originally presented in September 2021 when we showed a stunning significant improvement in median PFS associated with T-DXd, and that was really immediately practiced changing.
But the overall survival data were not mature at that time. So at San Antonio we provided updated overall survival results. We had seen 169 overall survival events in July 2022, which triggered the analysis. We showed that the median overall survival had not been reached yet for either treatment arm. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in overall survival seen with T-DXd.
The hazard ratio was 0.64. In addition, we presented updated median progression-free survival by independent review. And now the median PFS had been met with T-DXd and was 28.8 months, which was roughly four times longer than seen with T-DM1.
In addition, we saw an objective response rate of almost 80% with T-DXd, which was higher than with T-DM1. 21% of patients having a complete response compared to 9.5% with T-DM1. So overall the results show real benefits with T-DXd firmly placing this as the standard of care in regions where it's available after trastuzumab and taxane.
In terms of safety, the safety data looked fairly similar to what was previously reported. However, there were more all grade ILD events noted this time with longer treatment duration and longer follow-up. 15% or so of patients treated with T-DXd had ILD compared to about 10% at the time of initial reporting. But all of these additional events were grade one or two. There were no new grade three events and zero grade four or five events.
So in summary, I think these data really solidly place T-DXd as the standard of care in the second line setting after trastuzumab and taxane. We have exciting studies ongoing looking at T-DXd in the frontline setting, in the adjuvant setting, so I'm looking forward to seeing more data emerge relating to this very effective regimen.
The ASCO Post Staff
Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses results from the POSITIVE trial, which showed that a temporary interruption of endocrine therapy in women with hormone-responsive breast cancer in order to attempt pregnancy, does not affect short-term disease outcomes. The study found that 74% of women had at least one pregnancy, most (70%) within 2 years. Birth defects were low (2%) and were not clearly associated with treatment exposure. Dr. Partridge explains that these data stress the need to incorporate patient-centered reproductive health care in the treatment and follow-up of young women with breast cancer (Abstract GS4-09).
The ASCO Post Staff
Erica L. Mayer, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses findings from the PACE study of patients with endocrine- and CDK4/6 inhibitor–pretreated estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were randomly assigned to fulvestrant alone; fulvestrant and palbociclib; or fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab. Combining palbociclib with fulvestrant beyond disease progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor regimen did not improve progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone. A longer progression-free survival when a PD-L1 inhibitor was added to fulvestrant and palbociclib deserves further study. A baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis suggests that the potential benefit of palbociclib after progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor may be influenced by ESR1 or PIK3CA status (Abstract GS3-06).
The ASCO Post Staff
Ruth O’Regan, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center, discusses the Breast Cancer Index (BCI), a genomic assay that can assess the risk of late distant recurrence (5–10 years after diagnosis) of hormone receptor–positive, early-stage breast cancer. Among premenopausal women with this disease who were enrolled in the SOFT trial, those with a high BCI score had an increased risk of distant recurrence. Those with a low BCI score benefited more from the addition of ovarian suppression therapy to endocrine therapy after 12 years of follow-up (Abstract GS1-06).
The ASCO Post Staff
Yara Abdou, MD, of the University of North Carolina, discusses results from the RxPONDER SWOG S1007 study, which showed that non-Hispanic Black women with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with one to three involved lymph nodes and a recurrence score of ≤ 25 have worse outcomes than non-Hispanic White women. In addition, Black patients were more likely to accept treatment assignment than their White counterparts and were just as likely to remain on estrogen therapy at 6 and 12 months, suggesting that outcome differences may be less likely attributable to lack of treatment compliance within the first year (Abstract GS1-01 ).
The ASCO Post Staff
Sean Khozin, MD, MPH, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, discusses the “external validity deficits” of randomized clinical trials, which still involve only about 5% of adults with cancer, who may differ in important ways from real-world populations. Dr. Khozin describes the reasons for low levels of participation and advocates for capturing the experience of patients not represented in traditional clinical trials, so real-world data can address these validity deficits.
