Advertisement


François-Clément Bidard, MD, PhD: Circulating Tumor Cells May Help Improve Outcomes in Metastatic Disease

2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Advertisement

François-Clément Bidard, MD, PhD, of the Institut Curie, discusses overall survival results from the STIC CTC trial. To guide the choice between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for patients with metastatic, estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, researchers compared circulating tumor cell (CTC) count to physician’s choice of treatment. The data suggest that the CTC count resulted in better long-term outcomes (Abstract GS3-09).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The purpose of the STIC CTC study was to interrogate the clinical utility of circulating tumor cell count as a biomarker to drive the treatment decision between endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in ER-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. What we did is we collected, on one hand, the clinicians best estimate whether a patient should be treated with endocrine therapy or chemotherapy, and on the other hand, we also collected a circulating tumor cell count by the CELLSEARCH system. Then, the design of our study is like the MINDACT trial, so patients with concurrent estimates. Patients for whom endocrine therapy was a best treatment option according to physician's choice and also had a low CTC count, these patients were treated with endocrine therapy. On the other side of the spectrum, patients that were to be treated with chemotherapy according to the physician and a high CTC count also received chemotherapy. What is interesting is that we had 40% of patient with discrepant estimates between the clinician estimates and the CTC count. What the overall survival results reported earlier show is we have a benefit in terms of overall survival for the population of patients who were clinical low, which means endocrine therapy was a favorite treatment option according to the physician, and had a CTC-high count. And so these patients were treated with chemotherapy in the experimental arm. That benefit is very clinically meaningful, because the delta, the difference, between the two median overall survival was 16 months. The main limitation of our trial is that the trial was run prior to the use of CDK4/6 inhibitor in first line. I have to be clear here, our results do not apply to CDK4/6 inhibitor naive-patients. For these patients, endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitor must remain standard of care and the CTC count has not demonstrated any utility in that setting. However, what is very relevant is that CDK4/6 inhibitors are now moving to the adjuvant setting and we also have patients that are progressing on first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor. We know that for these patients we currently don't know exactly how to propose the best treatment between a first line of chemotherapy and/or a further line of endocrine therapy, and we believe that our results advocate in favor of the use of circulating tumor cell count as one of several biomarkers that could help improving the second-line therapy. In the next year to come, there will be performed changes in the way we treat patients and the second-line setting. For some patients, will have, still, endocrine therapy agents, for other patients who will have chemotherapy or antibody-drug conjugates. We will have to integrate many biomarkers, which could be ESR1 mutation, which could be HER2-low status. The STIC CTC trial advocates in favor of fusing the circulating tumor cell counts. It is not the only biomarker, but it is a strong prognostic biomarker that could help deciding between different treatment options.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Joseph A. Sparano, MD, on Long-Term Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival Data from TAILORx

Joseph A. Sparano, MD, of the Tisch Cancer Center at Mount Sinai Health System, discusses long-term clinical outcomes data that continue to show many women with early breast cancer can safely forgo chemotherapy, when guided by the 21-gene recurrence score result. The longer follow-up also showed that recurrences of breast cancer continue to occur years after the original diagnosis, although these recurrences were not prevented by chemotherapy use. Racial disparities were not explained by inequities in social determinants of health or treatment adherence, with Black women at higher risk of early recurrence within the first 5 years of diagnosis, but not later recurrence after 5 years (Abstract GS1-05).

Breast Cancer

Per Karlsson, MD, PhD: New Data on Breast-Conserving Surgery, With or Without Radiotherapy

Per Karlsson, MD, PhD, of Sweden’s University of Gothenburg and the Sahlgrenska Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses results from the POLAR study, which was a meta-analysis of three clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy. POLAR is the first genomic classifier that appears not only to be prognostic for locoregional recurrence, but also predictive of radiotherapy benefit. Although patients with breast cancer who had a high POLAR score benefited from radiotherapy, patients with a low score did not, and may be candidates for omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (Abstract GS4-03).

Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, on New Data on Capivasertib and Fulvestrant for Advanced Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner, MD, PhD, of London’s Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden, discusses phase III results from the CAPItello-291 clinical trial, which showed that in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative tumors resistant to aromatase inhibitors, adding the investigational AKT inhibitor capivasertib to fulvestrant doubled the median progression-free survival compared with placebo plus fulvestrant (Abstract GS3-04).

Breast Cancer

Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, on Camizestrant vs Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer: New Phase II Results

Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, of Spain’s Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, discusses findings from the SERENA-2 trial, which compared the next-generation selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant to fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Camizestrant, which can be taken as a daily pill (as opposed to fulvestrant, which must be given via injection), improved progression-free survival by up to 42% (Abstract GS3-02).

 

Breast Cancer

Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, MD, MSc, on Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy and Everolimus in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, MD, MSc, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses phase III results from the SWOG S1207 trial which was designed to evaluate the role of adjuvant everolimus in combination with adjuvant endocrine therapy among patients with high-risk, hormone­ receptor–positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. Adding everolimus did not improve invasive disease–free or overall survival and was associated with high rates of adverse events (Abstract GS1-07).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement