Advertisement

First-Line Ivonescimab or Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Squamous NSCLC


Advertisement
Get Permission

In an interim analysis of a Chinese phase III trial (HARMONi-6) reported in The Lancet, Chen et al found that the combination of ivonescimab—a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF—plus chemotherapy prolonged progression-free survival vs tislelizumab—an anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody—plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Study Details

In the multicenter double-blind trial, 761 patients with unresectable stage IIIB or IIIC or stage IV disease were randomly assigned between August 2023 and January 2025 to receive ivonescimab at 20 mg/kg (n = 266) or tislelizumab at 200 mg (n = 266) with paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 5 once every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by ivonescimab at 20 mg/kg or single-agent tislelizumab at 200 mg as maintenance treatment for up to 24 months. A total of 105 patients (39%) in the ivonescimab group and 105 (39%) in the tislelizumab group had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1%. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival on independent radiographic review committee assessment.

Key Findings

Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.9 months to not evaluable) in the ivonescimab group vs 6.9 months (95% CI = 5.8–8.6 months) in the tislelizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.46–0.78, P < .0001). Rates at 9 and 12 months were 62% vs 43% and 48% vs 35%.

Median progression-free survival was 9.9 vs 5.7 months in patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1% (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.37–0.82), 12.6 vs 8.6 months among those with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1% (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46–0.95), 12.6 vs 6.9 months among those with PD-L1 TPS of 1%–49% (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.98), and 12.6 vs 9.7 months among those with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.37–1.33).

Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 64% of the ivonescimab group vs 54% of the tislelizumab group; the most common were decreased neutrophil count (32% vs 26%), decreased white blood cell count (11% vs 9%), and anemia (6% vs 4%). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related hemorrhage occurred in five patients (2%) vs two patients (1%). Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 9% vs 10% of patients. Treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation of ivonescimab in 3% of patients and tislelizumab in 4% of patients. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in eight (3%) and ten patients (4%).

The investigators concluded: “In patients with untreated advanced squamous NSCLC, ivonescimab plus chemotherapy showed significantly improved progression-free survival compared with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 status, as well as a manageable safety profile. This regimen could be used as a novel first-line treatment in this patient group.”

Shun Lu, MD, of Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, is the corresponding author for The Lancet article.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Akeso Biopharma. For full disclosures of all study authors, visit thelancet.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement