Advertisement

EBRT With Focal Boost in Localized Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Follow-up


Advertisement
Get Permission

As reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Guricová et al, 10-year outcomes of the Dutch-Belgian phase III FLAME trial showed continued benefit of a focal radiotherapy boost to the intraprostatic tumor in patients receiving external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer.

Study Details

In the trial, 557 patients (intention-to-treat population) with intermediate- or high-risk disease were randomly assigned between 2009 and 2015 to receive standard EBRT at 77 Gy in 35 fractions to the whole prostate gland (n = 276) or standard EBRT with a focal boost of up to 95 Gy in magnetic resonance imaging–detected lesions (n = 281). Initial 5-year results showed a significant improvement in biochemical disease–free survival in the focal boost group with no additional toxicity.

Key Findings

At 10 years, biochemical disease–free survival was 86% in the focal boost group vs 71% in the standard group (P < .001). Significant differences favoring the focal boost group were also observed for 10-year disease-free survival (81% vs 67%, P < .001), local disease–free survival (95% vs 86%, P < .01), and regional lymph node disease-free survival (94% vs 85%, P < .01). No significant differences between the focal boost group vs the standard group were observed for distant metastasis–free survival (P = .17) or overall survival (P =.77).

Dose-response analysis suggested an association between focal boost dose and distant metastatic failure, with higher doses being associated with reduced risk of distant metastatic failure.

The investigators concluded: “The 10-year results demonstrated the sustained benefit of focal boosting on [biochemical disease-free survival]. By preventing biochemical failure, men are spared the potential burden of [prostate cancer] recurrence.”

Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, of the Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society. For full disclosures of all study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement