Advertisement


Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, on Patient-Reported Outcomes From EMBER-3

2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Giuseppe Curigliano, MD, PhD, of Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, University of Milano, discusses patient-reported outcomes from the phase III EMBER-3 trial, which investigated treatment with imlunestrant, investigator’s choice of standard endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant plus abemaciclib in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Abstract 1001).  



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
The EMBER-3 was a prospective randomized trial comparing a standard of care that is endocrine therapy versus imlunestrant and imlunestrant alone versus imlunestrant plus abemaciclib. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival and according to the data that will be presented, imlunestrant alone was better than standard of care endocrine therapy in the patient population with ESR1 mutation. The secondary endpoint of the study was to compare imlunestrant to imlunestrant plus abemaciclib and the addition of abemaciclib improved median progression-free survival versus imlunestrant. What we are going to present during ASCO is the secondary endpoint: patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. We assessed global health status and quality of life in patients receiving imlunestrant alone, endocrine therapy standard of care, and imlunestrant plus abemaciclib. According to the results of the study, the quality of life and the global health status of the patient population receiving abemaciclib plus imlunestrant was exactly very similar to the standard arm imlunestrant alone. Also, when we compare imlunestrant to standard of care, we have a similar quality of life and similar patient-reported outcome. Maybe the most interesting finding of the study was the injection site reaction, because the patients in the standard of care arm received fulvestrant and many of the patients in the patient-reported outcome complained about injection site reaction. We have also to report the data on diarrhea that was more frequent in the arm imlunestrant plus abemaciclib versus imlunestrant alone even if data are almost similar to the standard of care actually the fulvestrant plus abemaciclib. So in conclusion, the data on patient-reported outcome from EMBER-3 confirm that quality of life and global health status was not so different with respect to standard of care. We have also to report that injection site reaction derived from fulvestrant administration was a major issue for almost all patients. So we confirm that imlunestrant alone is better than standard of care in ESR1-mutant population, and that the combination of imlunestrant plus abemaciclib is a new standard of care in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease without affecting global health status and quality of life.

Related Videos

Lung Cancer

Martin Reck, MD, PhD, on Postsurgical MRD, Genomic Mutations, and Outcomes in Resectable NSCLC: AEGEAN Trial

Martin Reck, MD, PhD, of LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Germany, discusses data from the phase III AEGEAN trial that studied perioperative durvalumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who were MRD-positive after surgery had significantly worse disease-free survival compared to MRD-negative patients. In addition, mutations in KEAP1 and KMT2C were associated with MRD positivity and reduced benefit from the regimen, identifying a small high-risk subgroup with poor prognosis (Abstract 8009). 

Colorectal Cancer

Frank A. Sinicrope, MD, on Adjuvant Treatment Strategies for Stage III dMMR Colon Cancer

Frank A. Sinicrope, MD, of Mayo Clinic Rochester, reviews findings from the randomized Alliance A021502/ATOMIC trial, which studied standard chemotherapy alone or combined with atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III DNA mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) colon cancer (LBA1). 

 

Leukemia

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, on Fixed-Duration Ibrutinib and Venetoclax in First-Line CLL

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, reviews the final analysis of phase II CAPTIVATE study demonstrating the long-term efficacy and safety of ibrutinib plus venetoclax for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), including in patients with high-risk genomic features. The 5.5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 66% and 97%, respectively (Abstract 7036).

Pancreatic Cancer

Sameek Roychowdhury, MD, PhD, on Telemedicine in Clinical Trials

Sameek Roychowdhury, MD, PhD, of the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, discusses a recently opened telemedicine clinical trial of pemigatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic FGFR-mutated pancreatic cancer, and the germination of a new initiative, TNT Cancer, which focuses on leveraging telemedicine to bring trials nationwide.

Colorectal Cancer

Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, on MSI-H/dMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expanded Analyses From CheckMate 8HW

Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, reviews analyses from the CheckMate 8HW trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy for microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair–deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (Abstract 3501). 

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement