Advertisement


Aditya Bardia, MD, on Destiny-Breast06: An Additional Analysis

2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Advertisement

Aditya Bardia, MD, of UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, presents the additional analysis of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician’s choice of chemotherapy by pace of disease progression on prior endocrine-based therapy from DESTINY-Breast06 (Abstract LB1-04).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
DESTINY-Breast06 was a pivotal phase III trial that looked at T-DXd or trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2-directed ADC versus chemotherapy of physician's choice for patients with metastatic hormone-receptor positive HER2-low, as well as ultra-low metastatic breast cancer. The trial was different from previous studies in that it included patients who had not received prior chemotherapy, so it was in the chemotherapy-naive setting, and it also included patients who had rapid disease progression on first-line therapy with the CDK4/6 inhibitor. So if a patient had disease progression within first six months of first-line therapy, as the next line, they were eligible for this clinical trial. At ASCO 2024, we saw the primary results where patients who received T-DXd had superior progression-free survival as compared to standard chemotherapy. The median PFS was about 13 months with T-DXd, versus eight months with standard chemo. At SABCS 2024, we saw additional results by the pace of disease progression. We saw PFS-II results, and we also saw results based on the amount of disease or disease burden. So if you look at the pace of disease progression, let's start with patients who had rapid disease progression. In that setting, where T-DXd was used just after the first-line therapy, the median PFS was 14 months with T-DXd, versus about six months with standard chemotherapy. This corresponded to a hazard ratio of .38. So clear benefit with T-DXd in that setting. But it also worked in other patients who had longer duration on their CDK4/6 inhibitors, six to 12 or more than 12 as well. If you look at PFS-II, so that is looking at date of randomization till the second disease progression, that was also higher with T-DXd, 20 months, so that's close to two years, versus about 14 months with standard chemotherapy. So the benefit was maintained in the PFS-II setting as well. And then finally, we looked at the amount of disease burden, patients who had less than three metastatic sites versus more than three metastatic sites. Again, the benefit of T-DXd was maintained. We looked at patients who had liver meds versus no liver meds, the benefit of T-DXd was maintained. So overall T-DXd is superior to standard chemotherapy, which included taxanes or capecitabine in this clinical trial, with a median PFS of more than 13 months versus about eight months with standard chemo. So it's a potential option in this setting for patients with both HER2-low as well as ultra-low metastatic breast cancer.

Related Videos

Breast Cancer

Adrienne Waks, MD, on MARGOT/TBCRC052: Phase II Trial in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Adrienne Waks, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, discusses the randomized phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant paclitaxel/margetuximab/pertuzumab vs paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab in patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer. This trial is being done to determine how well HER2-positive breast cancer responds to preoperative treatment using one of two different combinations of drugs as a treatment for this diagnosis (Abstract LB1-02).

Breast Cancer

Andrew Tutt, MB ChB, PhD, FMedSci, on OlympiA: High-Risk BRCA-Positive Breast Cancer

Andrew Tutt, MB ChB, PhD, FMedSci, Director of The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) and Guy’s Hospital King’s College, London, discusses longer-term follow-up of OlympiA, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjuvant olaparib after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants and high-risk HER2-negative primary breast cancer (Abstract GS1-09).

Breast Cancer

Sibylle Loibl, MD, PhD, on Primary Results of the Randomized, Phase III PADMA Study in HER2-Negative/HR-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Sibylle Loibl, MD, PhD, of the German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany, presented primary results of the randomized phase III PADMA trial comparing first-line endocrine therapy plus palbociclib vs standard mono-chemotherapy in women with high-risk HER2-negative/HR-positive metastatic breast cancer and indication for chemotherapy (Abstract LB1-03).  

Breast Cancer

Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, on Primary Results of SOLTI VALENTINE

Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, of Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Spain, presented the primary results of SOLTI VALENTINE, a neoadjuvant randomized phase II trial of HER3-DXd alone or in combination with letrozole for high-risk hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer (Abstract LB1-06). 

Breast Cancer

Nan Chen, MD, on Impact of Anthracyclines in High Genomic Risk Node-Negative HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Nan Chen, MD, of the University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, discusses the impact of anthracyclines in high genomic risk node-negative HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (Abstract GS3-03).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement