Advertisement


Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, on Surviving Childhood Leukemia Near the Border of the United States and Mexico

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, of the University of California, San Diego, and Rady Children’s Hospital, talks about using a health systems strengthening approach to improve leukemia care and survival in a public Mexican hospital in the region of the border between the United States and Mexico. The demonstrated increase in overall survival across a decade after implementation of the program seems to validate the use of such models, not only to improve clinical outcomes, but also to build sustainable hospital capacity, financially and organizationally (Abstract 1502).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Paula Aristizabal, MD: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common childhood cancer and survival has improved dramatically in high income countries to rates over 80%. Unfortunately, in low and middle income countries, survival has not increased at the same pace. For example, in Mexico, a low income country that is just across the border from the US, survival range is between 10% and 60%. Since in San Diego we share a border with Tijuana, we saw the disparities and we thought that it was our social responsibility to do something about it so we implemented a twinning program and twinning involves when a center of excellence in a high income country partners and collaborates with a center in a low, middle income country. We started this twinning program in 2008 in collaboration with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and we were able to implement a new team in Tijuana that was able to provide the best care possible for all the pediatric cancers. Then in 2013, we realized that the burden of leukemia was getting higher and higher and we decided to implement a new model of health system strengthening called the WHO Framework for Action. The WHO Framework for Action has six building blocks that provide all the elements to improve care in a health system. We incorporated the WHO Framework for Action into the already existing twinning model to improve leukemia survival. We provided training to the team in Tijuana. We provided protocols that they could adapt. We provided mentorship and we provided support for a new infrastructure to develop the best possible leukemia care for children with with leukemia in Baja, California, Mexico. After the implementation of the program, survival for leukemia improved from 59% to 65% and, importantly, the survival for standard risk leukemia improved from 73% before implementing the program to 100%, which is totally amazing because that is the same survival that we have in San Diego, just 20 miles from Tijuana. Survival for high risk leukemia improved from 48% to 55%. It wasn't so significant but we know that that is an area of improvement that we hope that we can tackle in our next steps of the program. Our model in Tijuana, combining a twinning program with the WHO Framework for Action, was effective in improving survival in a low and middle income country. This model can be applicable to a partnership between a high income country and a low, middle income country, especially in regions that share a border but also in other low and middle income countries remotely. Something that we learned from COVID is that you can apply many of these models working remotely and we are extremely pleased with these results. Our next steps include the improvement of the survival for patients with high risk leukemia.

Related Videos

Gynecologic Cancers

Marie Plante, MD, on Cervical Cancer: New Data on Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection

Marie Plante, MD, of Canada’s Université Laval and the CHUQ Hotel Dieu de Québec, discusses phase III results from a study that compared radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection vs simple hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. The pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years in the women who underwent simple hysterectomy is not inferior to those who had radical hysterectomy. In addition, fewer surgical complications and better quality of life were observed with simple hysterectomy (LBA5511).

Colorectal Cancer

Cathy Eng, MD, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, on Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Standard Treatment

Cathy Eng, MD, of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South and the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, discuss phase III results from the Scandinavian NeoCol trial, which showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in terms of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colon cancer, although there are certain circumstances when this approach may have more favorable outcomes (Abstract LBA3503).

Lymphoma

Tycel J. Phillips, MD, and Emanuele Zucca, MD, on Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: New Data on Observation vs Radiotherapy

Tycel J. Phillips, MD, of City of Hope National Medical Center, and Emanuele Zucca, MD, of the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland and the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group, discuss findings from the largest prospective study of patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. The trial data support omitting radiotherapy in patients who achieve complete metabolic response after immunochemotherapy (Abstract LBA7505).

Breast Cancer

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, on Early Breast Cancer and Weight Loss: Results From the BWEL Trial

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses a telephone-based weight loss intervention that induced clinically meaningful weight loss in patients with breast cancer who had overweight and obesity, across demographic and tumor factors. Additional tailoring of the intervention may possibly enhance weight loss in Black and younger patients as well (Abstract 12001).

Colorectal Cancer

Thierry Conroy, MD, on Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results on mFOLFIRINOX vs Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

Thierry Conroy, MD, of the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, discusses phase III findings from the PRODIGE 23 trial, showing that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy improved all outcomes, including overall survival, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer compared with standard chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (Abstract LBA3504).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement